IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i16p2899-d257300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context

Author

Listed:
  • Youness Frichi

    (Laboratory of Manufacturing, Energy and Sustainable Development, High School of Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

  • Fouad Jawab

    (Laboratory of Manufacturing, Energy and Sustainable Development, High School of Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco
    Laboratory of International Management, Decision Making and Logistics (MIDLOG), Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

  • Said Boutahari

    (Laboratory of Manufacturing, Energy and Sustainable Development, High School of Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

Abstract

(1) Background: Quality of care (QC) is not only about satisfying patients, but also about satisfying the various health system stakeholders (HSS). This makes it a complex and difficult objective to achieve. This study aims at proposing a methodological framework for identifying HSS, prioritizing them in QC, and analyzing their interrelationships. (2) Methods: The proposed framework is the mixed-method 5W2D approach, which uses a combination of three basic methods: the 5W questioning technique (What, Who, Why, Where, and When), the Delphi method, and the Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. It consists of three interdependent phases. First of all, a preliminary list of HSS is established based on a systematic literature review, which is then projected and adapted to the national context using the 5W questioning technique. Secondly, the identified HSS are classified in order according to their influence and impact on QC by employing Delphi method. Thirdly, the interrelationships between HSS are determined and analyzed by applying DEMATEL technique. An application of 5W2D is conducted in the Moroccan context as its health system involves a wide range of stakeholders. (3) Results: Results defined 17 groups of HSS, whose prioritization led to three groups that are at the core of the health system: patients and their families, health personnel, and government. Roles and expectations of these groups regarding QC are divergent and contradictory, which require making trade-offs. The findings of this study intend to guide the development of inclusive strategies and policies that involve key stakeholders for QC assessment and improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Youness Frichi & Fouad Jawab & Said Boutahari, 2019. "The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2899-:d:257300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soeren Mattke & Edward Kelley & Peter Scherer & Jeremy Hurst & Maria Luisa Gil Lapetra & HCQI Expert Group Members, 2006. "Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Initial Indicators Report," OECD Health Working Papers 22, OECD Publishing.
    2. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    3. Carine Girard & André Sobczak, 2010. "Pour une cartographie des parties prenantes fondée sur leur engagement : une application aux sociétaires d'une banque mutualiste française," Post-Print hal-00771148, HAL.
    4. Claudia Symmank & Jana Krause & Sebastian Gurtner, 2015. "Stakeholder Variety in Healthcare and Their Integration in the Medical Device Development Process," Springer Books, in: Sebastian Gurtner & Katja Soyez (ed.), Challenges and Opportunities in Health Care Management, edition 127, pages 247-258, Springer.
    5. Helena, Ricardo, 2016. "Cross-border healthcare directive: Assessing stakeholders’ perspectives in Poland and Portugal," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(4), pages 369-376.
    6. Foley, Conor & Droog, Elsa & Healy, Orla & McHugh, Sheena & Buckley, Claire & Browne, John Patrick, 2017. "Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(7), pages 800-808.
    7. Edward Kelley & Jeremy Hurst, 2006. "Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper," OECD Health Working Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    8. Sheng-Li Si & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Ping Zhang, 2018. "DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-33, January.
    9. Morgane M.C. Fritz & Romana Rauter & Rupert Baumgartner & Nikolay Dentchev, 2018. "A supply chain perspective of stakeholder identification as a tool for responsible policy and decision-making," Post-Print hal-02547267, HAL.
    10. Ong, Suan Ee & Tyagi, Shilpa & Lim, Jane Mingjie & Chia, Kee Seng & Legido-Quigley, Helena, 2018. "Health systems reforms in Singapore: A qualitative study of key stakeholders," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 431-443.
    11. Tullberg, Jan, 2013. "Stakeholder theory: Some revisionist suggestions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 127-135.
    12. Thomas A. Kochan & Saul A. Rubinstein, 2000. "Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 367-386, August.
    13. John M Bryson, 2004. "What to do when Stakeholders matter," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 21-53, March.
    14. Ovseiko, Pavel V. & Buchan, Alastair M., 2015. "Medical workforce education and training: A failed decentralisation attempt to reform organisation, financing, and planning in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(12), pages 1545-1549.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afaf Haial & Loubna Benabbou & Abdelaziz Berrado, 2021. "Designing a Transportation-Strategy Decision-Making Process for a Supply Chain: Case of a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Imane Tronnebati & Fouad Jawab & Youness Frichi & Jabir Arif, 2024. "Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TOSIS, and Fuzzy WASPAS: A Case Study of the Moroccan Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Abigail Affiong Mkperedem & Peter Ogunlade & Chisaa Igbolekwu & Ogadimma Arisukwu & Abiodun Olawale Afolabi & Ruth Adefunke Adedayo, 2023. "Healthcare service delivery perception among NHIS-HMO enrollees in Lagos hospitals," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    2. Jia, Xiaohui & Cui, Yongmei, 2021. "Examining interrelationships of barriers in the evolution of maritime port smartification from a systematic perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 49-58.
    3. Boroch, Wilfried, 2018. "Dimensionen allgemeiner Gesundheitspolitik: Eine modifizierte Anordnung nach Kriterien der engen, weiten und praxisbezogenen Anwendung," ifgs Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales, volume 11, number 11 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales.
    4. Milena Vainieri & Francesca Ferrè & Stefania Manetti, 2021. "An Integrated Framework to Measure the Performance of Inter-Organizational Programme on Health Technology Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Stöver, Jana & Vöpel, Henning & Manouguian, Maral-Sonja & Verheyen, Frank, 2010. "Qualität und Effizienz der Gesundheitsversorgung im internationalen Vergleich," HWWI Policy Papers 55, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    6. Madalina Ecaterina Popescu & Eva Militaru & Amalia Cristescu & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Monica Mihaela Maer Matei, 2018. "Investigating Health Systems in the European Union: Outcomes and Fiscal Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Zeynep Or & Laure Com-Ruelle, 2008. "La qualité des soins en France : comment la mesurer pour l'améliorer ?," Working Papers DT19, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Dec 2008.
    8. Mariola Zalewska, 2015. "Limitations of the set of public health indicators monitored in the context of sustainable development (Ograniczenia wskaznikow zdrowia publicznego monitorowanych w kontekscie zrownowazonego rozwoju )," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(53), pages 247-260.
    9. Greß, Stefan & Maas, Stephanie & Wasem, Jürgen, 2008. "Effektivitäts-, Effizienz- und Qualitätsreserven im deutschen Gesundheitssystem," Arbeitspapiere 154, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    10. Duško Čučković & Ilija Ćosić & Milan Delić & Miroslav Miškić & Slavica Ranisavljev Kovačev, 2021. "Influence of Interpersonal Processes on the Performance of Primary Health Care Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Veillard, Jeremy & Moses McKeag, Alexandra & Tipper, Brenda & Krylova, Olga & Reason, Ben, 2013. "Methods to stimulate national and sub-national benchmarking through international health system performance comparisons: A Canadian approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 141-147.
    12. Miteniece, Elina & Pavlova, Milena & Rechel, Bernd & Groot, Wim, 2017. "Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Central and Eastern European countries: A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Bert George, 2017. "Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 527-530, November.
    14. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Martin Luštický & Martin Musil, 2016. "Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Tourism Policy Priorities: The Case of the South Bohemian Region," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 3-23.
    17. Jolanta MAJ, 2015. "Diversity Management’S Stakeholders And Stakeholders Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 780-793, November.
    18. Changping Zhao & Juanjuan Sun & Yun Zhang, 2022. "A Study of the Drivers of Decarbonization in the Plastics Supply Chain in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.
    20. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2899-:d:257300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.