IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2016i1p211-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Healthcare Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Kudelina

    (Siberian State Medical University)

  • Sofya eremina

    (Tomsk Polytechnic Unyversity, Subirian State Medical University)

Abstract

An evaluation of healthcare systems effectiveness of the regions of the Russian Federation (federal districts) was conducted using the Minmax method based on the data available at the United Interdepartmental Statistical Information System. Four groups of components (i.e. availability of resources; use of resources; access to resources and medical effectiveness) decomposed into 17 items were analyzed. The resource availability was measured by four indicators, including the provision of doctors, nurses, hospital beds; agencies providing health care to the population. Use of resources was measured by seven indicators: the average hospital stay, days; the average bed occupancy, days; the number of operations per 1 physician surgical; the cost per unit volume of medical care: in outpatient clinics, day hospitals, inpatient and emergency care. Access to the resources was measured by three indicators: the satisfaction of the population by medical care; the capacity of outpatient clinics; the average number of visits to health facility. The medical effectiveness was also measured by three indicators: incidence with the "first-ever diagnosis of malignancy"; life expectancy at birth, years; the number of days of temporary disability. The study of the dynamics of the components and indexes for 2008–2012 allows to indicate a multidirectional influence on the regional healthcare system. In some federal districts (e.g. North Caucasian), the effectiveness decreases due to resource availability, in others (South, North Caucasian) — due to the use of resources, in others (Far Eastern, Ural) — due to access to resources. It is found that the effectiveness of the healthcare systems of the federal districts differs significantly. In addition, the built matrix proves the variability the of effectiveness (comparison of expenditures and results) of healthcare systems of the federal districts of the Russian Federation: the high results can be obtained at high costs (the Far Eastern federal district) as well as at low costs (the Volga federal district). There is no possibility of reaching average results under any expenditures level (i.e. neither high, nor low, nor average). The proposed method of evaluation may become a basis for the creation of the strategic development programs of regional healthcare and the modeling of various scenarios for its realization while reaching the stable balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Kudelina & Sofya eremina, 2016. "Regional Healthcare Effectiveness," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 211-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:211-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2016/March_2016/ERMarch2016_211_225.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Kelley & Jeremy Hurst, 2006. "Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper," OECD Health Working Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    2. Valeriy Chereshnev & Dmitriy Verzilin & Tatyana Maksimova & Sergey Verzilin, 2013. "Environmental and socio-economic development of regions: evaluation of regional differentiation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 33-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    2. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Silvia Bruzzi & Enrico Ivaldi & Marta Santagata, 2022. "Measuring Regional Performance in the Italian NHS: Are Disparities Decreasing?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 1057-1084, February.
    4. Bernal-Delgado, Enrique & García-Armesto, Sandra & Peiró, Salvador, 2014. "Atlas of Variations in Medical Practice in Spain: The Spanish National Health Service under scrutiny," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 15-30.
    5. Terraneo, Marco, 2015. "Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 154-163.
    6. Anna Forgacs & Judit Beke Lisanyi, 2011. "Are Health Systems of Central European Countries the Least Efficient? A Cross Country Comparative Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 27-38.
    7. Pavlina Hejdukova, 2016. "Healthcare systems in Austria and the Czech Republic ? the same history, but with some differences," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Matthias Fischer & Harald Heinrichs, 2018. "Dimensions, Dialectic, Discourse. Three Political Perspectives on the Sustainability of the German Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series 135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Duško Čučković & Ilija Ćosić & Milan Delić & Miroslav Miškić & Slavica Ranisavljev Kovačev, 2021. "Influence of Interpersonal Processes on the Performance of Primary Health Care Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Or, Zeynep & Cases, Chantal & Lisac, Melanie & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Winblad, Ulrika & Bevan, Gwyn, 2010. "Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 269-293, July.
    12. Youness Frichi & Fouad Jawab & Said Boutahari, 2019. "The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Zhao, Guangchuan & Cao, Xinbang & Ma, Chao, 2020. "Accounting for horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care: A framework for measurement and decomposition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 13-24.
    14. Milena Vainieri & Guido Noto & Francesca Ferre & Laura C. Rosella, 2020. "A Performance Management System in Healthcare for All Seasons?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Vaida Servetkienė & Roma Puronaitė & Birutė Mockevičienė & Karolis Ažukaitis & Danguolė Jankauskienė, 2023. "Determinants of Patient-Perceived Primary Healthcare Quality in Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Marion Devaux, 2015. "Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(1), pages 21-33, January.
    17. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane, 2020. "Inequity in physician visits: the case of the unregulated fee market in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Tello, Juan E. & Barbazza, Erica & Waddell, Kerry, 2020. "Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 12-24.
    19. Kim, Hongsoo & Cheng, Shou-Hsia, 2018. "Assessing quality of primary diabetes care in South Korea and Taiwan using avoidable hospitalizations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(11), pages 1222-1231.
    20. Boroch, Wilfried, 2018. "Dimensionen allgemeiner Gesundheitspolitik: Eine modifizierte Anordnung nach Kriterien der engen, weiten und praxisbezogenen Anwendung," ifgs Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales, volume 11, number 11 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:211-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.