IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/k6fe9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Implications of Morality Politics for Effecting Inclusion in the STEM Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • McNeely, Connie L.

Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce development, identified as a critical consideration for meeting current and future societal needs and challenges, depends on the capacity to draw upon a talented pool of individuals possessing requisite knowledge and training. In the United States, as elsewhere, related questions have arisen about who constitutes that pool and the conditions under which it has been determined. Noting the currency and controversies surrounding persistent inequalities and inequities in STEM educational attainment and workforce participation, the research presented here offers an elaborated framework and dedicated analysis of related processes, with the goal of extending understanding and delineating implications for identifying strategic points for intervention. In ideological and political terms, efforts to combat related educational and workforce disparities reflect a “morality politics” diffused in social identities and behaviors and embedded in structural claims with broad and pragmatic implications for STEM educational access and workforce opportunity. With particular attention to race and ethnicity (and gender), this analysis revisits and unpacks related assumptions and addresses challenges attached to the distribution of benefits and burdens in the face of both ideological and practical expediencies in determining profiles of STEM participation and inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • McNeely, Connie L., 2021. "The Implications of Morality Politics for Effecting Inclusion in the STEM Workforce," SocArXiv k6fe9, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:k6fe9
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/k6fe9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6016b988c5784b0448d03cb2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/k6fe9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Regina P. Branton & Bradford S. Jones, 2005. "Reexamining Racial Attitudes: The Conditional Relationship Between Diversity and Socioeconomic Environment," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(2), pages 359-372, April.
    2. Cheryl Leggon, 2006. "Women in Science: Racial and Ethnic Differences and the Differences They Make," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 325-333, May.
    3. Lisa M. Frehill & Connie L. McNeely & Willie Pearson, 2015. "An International Perspective on Advancing Women in Science," Springer Books, in: Willie Pearson, Jr. & Lisa M. Frehill & Connie L. McNeely (ed.), Advancing Women in Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 1-6, Springer.
    4. Daryl E. Chubin & Catherine Didion & Josephine Beoku-Betts, 2015. "Promising Programs: A Cross-National Exploration of Women in Science, Education to Workforce," Springer Books, in: Willie Pearson, Jr. & Lisa M. Frehill & Connie L. McNeely (ed.), Advancing Women in Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 275-305, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markaki, Yvonni, 2012. "Sources of anti-immigration attitudes in the United Kingdom: the impact of population, labour market and skills context," ISER Working Paper Series 2012-24, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. James Laurence & Katharina Schmid & Miles Hewstone, 2018. "Ethnic Diversity, Inter-group Attitudes and Countervailing Pathways of Positive and Negative Inter-group Contact: An Analysis Across Workplaces and Neighbourhoods," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 719-749, April.
    3. Yvonni Markaki & Simonetta Longhi, 2012. "What Determines Attitudes to Immigration in European Countries? An Analysis at the Regional Level," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1233, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    4. Monica McDermott, 2011. "Racial Attitudes in City, Neighborhood, and Situational Contexts," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 153-173, March.
    5. Esther Havekes & Marcel Coenders & Karien Dekker, 2014. "Interethnic attitudes in urban neighbourhoods: The impact of neighbourhood disorder and decline," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2665-2684, September.
    6. Christine H. Roch & Michael Rushton, 2008. "Racial Context and Voting over Taxes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 36(5), pages 614-634, September.
    7. Karen L. Webber & Samantha M. Rogers, 2018. "Gender Differences in Faculty Member Job Satisfaction: Equity Forestalled?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(8), pages 1105-1132, December.
    8. Sofia Moratti, 2020. "Do Low-Openness, Low-Transparency Procedures in Academic Hiring Disadvantage Women?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Su-Min & Alexandru, 2022. "Do Labels Polarise? Theory and Evidence from the Brexit Referendum," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2227, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Hajibabaei, Anahita & Schiffauerova, Andrea & Ebadi, Ashkan, 2022. "Gender-specific patterns in the artificial intelligence scientific ecosystem," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    11. Goran Dominioni & Addolorata Marasco & Alessandro Romano, 2018. "A mathematical approach to study and forecast racial groups interactions: deterministic modeling and scenario method," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1929-1956, July.
    12. Andrew S. Fullerton, 2009. "A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 38(2), pages 306-347, November.
    13. Wai, Jonathan & Hodges, Jaret & Makel, Matthew C., 2018. "Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 76-83.
    14. Perez-Felkner, Lara & Felkner, John S. & Nix, Samantha & Magalhães, Melissa, 2020. "The puzzling relationship between international development and gender equity: The case of STEM postsecondary education in Cambodia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:k6fe9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.