IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198101010800008463.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The dynamics of crop yields in the U. S. Corn Belt as effected by weather and technological progress

Author

Listed:
  • Pope, C. Arden, III

Abstract

Producers of agricultural products, policy makers, and consumers alike have a keen interest in what will happen to crop yields in the future. This study attempts to carefully analyze past trends in crop yields in five Corn Belt states, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, and Ohio, and how they have been affected by weather and technological progress over time;State average yields for corn grain, corn silage, soybeans, small grains, and meadow (leguminous hay) are modeled as a system of equations where yields are functions of weather, technological progress, and nitrogen application. Time series data on yields, nitrogen and corn prices, nitrogen application, and weather are collected. Time is used as a proxy variable for technological progress and the models from all five states are estimated using three stage least squares regression. The estimated models do a good job of fitting the 1951-1980 time series data and they illustrate that technological progress and weather are the most important factors that affect yields;The prospects of favorable future weather are analyzed by regressing weather variables from 1930-1980 or dummy variables for each state and for periods of abnormally favorable weather. These models are able to explain only a small portion of the total variance in weather, but they do indicate that the periods during 1942-1952 and 1961-1973 can be characterized as more cool and wet, and generally more favorable to crop yields than average. However, attempts to use this information to project future weather would be ludicrous;The prospects of future yield increases as a result of technological progress are examined by looking at some of the major factors that affect crop yields. It can be seen that technological progress is a large and complex set of interacting conditions, occurrences and activities that cannot be easily modeled, described, or projected. Attempts to project future yields must be based on various assumptions about future technological progress;Yields are projected for the year 2000, using the estimated models, under six different scenarios based on various assumptions about future technological progress, weather, and nitrogen application. In general, with the noted exception of wheat, there is little evidence found in the time series data that would indicate a leveling off of Corn Belt crop yields in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Pope, C. Arden, III, 1981. "The dynamics of crop yields in the U. S. Corn Belt as effected by weather and technological progress," ISU General Staff Papers 198101010800008463, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800008463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/9ce6f7a4-e869-4775-97b4-e1539c1d173d/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Roy Black & Stanley R. Thompson, 1978. "Some Evidence on Weather-Crop-Yield Interaction," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(3), pages 540-543.
    2. Peterson, Willis L. & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "Technical Change in Agriculture," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Lin, Kuang-hsing T. & Seaver, Stanley K., 1978. "Were U.S. Crop Yields Random in Recent Years?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 139-142, December.
    4. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. D. W. Jorgenson & Z. Griliches, 1967. "The Explanation of Productivity Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 249-283.
    6. Johnson, D. Gale, 1975. "World Food Problems," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, October.
    7. George W. Ladd, 1979. "Artistic Research Tools for Scientific Minds," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(1), pages 1-11.
    8. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Fisher, Anthony C & Krutilla, John V & Cicchetti, Charles J, 1972. "The Economics of Environmental Preservation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 605-619, September.
    10. Vernon W. Ruttan, 1979. "Inflation and Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 896-902.
    11. Perrin, Richard Kidd, 1968. "Analysis and prediction of crop yields for agricultural policy purposes," ISU General Staff Papers 196801010800004688, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. A. A. Araji & R. J. Sim & R. L. Gardner, 1978. "Returns to Agricultural Research and Extension Programs: An Ex-Ante Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(5), pages 964-968.
    13. Bernard Oury, 1965. "Allowing for Weather in Crop Production Model Building," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(2), pages 270-283.
    14. Earl O. Heady, 1961. "Public Purpose in Agricultural Research and Education," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 43(3), pages 566-581.
    15. Johnson, D. Gale, 1975. "World Food Problems," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-23, October.
    16. George W. Norton & Jeffrey S. Davis, 1981. "Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 685-699.
    17. Clifton B. Luttrell & R. Alton Gilbert, 1976. "Crop Yields: Random, Cyclical, or Bunchy?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(3), pages 521-531.
    18. Zvi Griliches, 1958. "Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(5), pages 419-419.
    19. Lawrence H. Shaw, 1964. "The Effect of Weather on Agricultural Output: A Look at Methodology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 218-230.
    20. Lin, Kuang-Hsing Terence & Seaver, Stanley K., 1978. "Were U.S. Crop Yields Random In Recent Years?," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-4, December.
    21. Foote, Richard J. & Bean, Louis H., 1951. "Are Yearly Variations in Crop Yield Really Random?," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, January.
    22. Auer, L., 1963. "Impact of crop-yield technology on US crop production," ISU General Staff Papers 196301010800003515, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    23. Culbertson, John D., 1981. "Research and Development of Food Processing Firms," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(1), June.
    24. Harrison, Virden L., 1976. "Do Sunspot Cycles Affect Crop Yields?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307575, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azam, Qazi Tauqir & Bloom, Erik A. & Evenson, Robert E., 1991. "Agricultural Research Productivity in Pakistan," Center Discussion Papers 321325, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    2. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "The Production Function Approach to the Relationship Between Productivity Growth and R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232791, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    3. Geigel, Joanne M. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1984. "A Review And Evaluation Of Weather-Crop Yield Models," Staff Papers 13699, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Kancs, d’Artis & Siliverstovs, Boriss, 2016. "R&D and non-linear productivity growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 634-646.
    5. Godin, Benoit, 2004. "The New Economy: what the concept owes to the OECD," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 679-690, July.
    6. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Technical Change and Productivity Growth in the U.K. Agricultural Sector," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232790, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    7. Araji, A. A. & White, F. C. & Guenthner, J. F., 1994. "Return To Potato Research," A.E. Research Series 305115, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    8. Biggs SD. & Clay EJ., 1983. "Generation and diffusion of agricultural technology: a review of theories and experiences," ILO Working Papers 992260213402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Araji, A. A. & Guenthner, J., 2002. "Genetically Modified (Gm) Foods: Consumers' And Producers' Perceptions And The Economic - Environmental Benefits," A.E. Research Series 305032, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    10. Madan M. Dey & Ferdinand J. Paraguas & Patrick Kambewa & Diemuth E. Pemsl, 2010. "The impact of integrated aquaculture–agriculture on small‐scale farms in Southern Malawi," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(1), pages 67-79, January.
    11. Ariel Ortiz-Bobea, 2021. "Climate, Agriculture and Food," Papers 2105.12044, arXiv.org.
    12. Farrell E. Jensen & C. Arden Pope, 1987. "The changing structure of US agriculture and implications for research in agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 139-150.
    13. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.
    14. repec:lic:licosd:32112 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Midingoyi, Soul-kifouly & Hippolyte, Affognon & Georges, Ong'amo & Bruno, LeRu, 2015. "Economic Welfare Change Attributable to Biological Control of Lepidopteran Cereal Stemborer Pests in East and Southern Africa: Cases of Maize and Sorghum in Kenya, Mozambique and Zambia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212461, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Widmer, Lorne & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George, 1987. "The Rate of Return to Beef Cattle Research in Canda," Working Papers 244821, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    17. Andersen, Matthew A., 2019. "Knowledge productivity and the returns to agricultural research: a review," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(2), April.
    18. Scobie, Grant M., 1984. "Investment in Agricultural Research: Some Economic Principles," Economics Working Papers 232447, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    19. Runge, C. Ford, 2006. "Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History," Staff Papers 13649, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Araji, A. A. & Hafez, S., 2001. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Investment In Agricultural Biotechnology Research," A.E. Research Series 305028, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    21. Smith, Anna Rickett & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 2002. "An Economic Evaluation Of Cotton And Peanut Research In Southeastern United States," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19900, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198101010800008463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.