IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/iuiwop/1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Inc-Dec Game and How to Mitigate It

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The power exchange and the real-time markets used by the system operator differ in how system constraints are managed. This can result in regulatory arbitrage, which can increase consumer costs, increase the risk of power outages and distort investment incentives. This paper uses a game-theoretical approach to study these problems and proposes various measures to reduce them. For example, zones and grid tariffs can be adjusted. Moreover, regulations of real-time markets can improve, and transmission system operators can implement measures to increase the capacity of the existing grid.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmberg, Pär, 2024. "The Inc-Dec Game and How to Mitigate It," Working Paper Series 1512, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp1512.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eicke, Anselm & Khanna, Tarun & Hirth, Lion, 2020. "Locational investment signals - How to steer the siting of new generation capacity in power systems?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 41(6), pages 281-304.
    2. Newbery, David M. & Biggar, Darryl R., 2024. "Marginal curtailment of wind and solar PV: Transmission constraints, pricing and access regimes for efficient investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga, Jesse D. Jenkins, and Carlos Batlle, 2017. "A regulatory framework for an evolving electricity sector: Highlights of the MIT utility of the future study," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    4. E. J. Anderson & H. Xu, 2004. "Nash equilibria in electricity markets with discrete prices," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 60(2), pages 215-238, October.
    5. Newbery, D. & Biggar, D., 2024. "Marginal curtailment of wind and solar PV: transmission constraints, pricing and access regimes for efficient investment," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2405, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. David Newbery & Darryl Biggar, 2024. "Marginal curtailment of wind and solar PV: transmission constraints, pricing and access regimes for efficient investment," Working Papers EPRG2401, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    7. Intini, Mario & Waterson, Michael, 2023. "Strategic behaviour by wind generators: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Anselm Eicke & Tarun Khanna & Lion Hirth, 2020. "Locational Investment Signals: How to Steer the Siting of New Generation Capacity in Power Systems?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(6), pages 281-304, November.
    9. Christoph Graf & Thomas Kuppelwieser & David Wozabal, 2024. "Frequent Auctions for Intraday Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(1), pages 231-256, January.
    10. Jahns, Christopher & Stein, Tobias & Höckner, Jonas & Weber, Christoph, 2023. "Prevention of strategic behaviour in local flexibility markets using market monitoring – Concept, application example and limitations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Par Holmberg & Ewa Lazarczyk, 2015. "Comparison of Congestion Management Techniques: Nodal, Zonal and Discriminatory Pricing," The Energy Journal, , vol. 36(2), pages 145-166, April.
    12. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Orlando Valarezo & Tomás Gómez & José Pablo Chaves-Avila & Leandro Lind & Mauricio Correa & David Ulrich Ziegler & Rodrigo Escobar, 2021. "Analysis of New Flexibility Market Models in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Pär Holmberg and Ewa Lazarczyk, 2015. "Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    15. Eric Budish & Peter Cramton & John Shim, 2015. "Editor's Choice The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1547-1621.
    16. Pollitt, M. G., 2023. "Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) for Electricity in Europe? The Untold Story," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2352, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn & May, Nils, 2016. "Auctions for Intraday -Trading Impacts on efficient power markets and secure system operation," EconStor Research Reports 148282, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Martin Palovic & Christine Brandstätt & Gert Brunekreeft & Marius Buchmann, 2021. "Strategisches Verhalten bei marktbasiertem Redispatch: Die internationalen Erfahrungen," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0036, Bremen Energy Research.
    19. Radecke, Julia & Hefele, Joseph & Hirth, Lion, 2019. "Markets for Local Flexibility in Distribution Networks," EconStor Preprints 204559, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    20. Hadsell, Lester, 2007. "The impact of virtual bidding on price volatility in New York's wholesale electricity market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 66-72, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebenaque, Olivier & Schmitt, Carlo & Schumann, Klemens & Dronne, Théo & Roques, Fabien, 2023. "Success of local flexibility market implementation: A review of current projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Lundin, Erik, 2022. "Geographic price granularity and investments in wind power: Evidence from a Swedish electricity market splitting reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Katzen, Matthew & Leslie, Gordon W., 2024. "Siting and operating incentives in electrical networks: A study of mispricing in zonal markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Holmberg, Pär & Tangerås, Thomas, 2021. "Sweden's Energy Investment Challenge," Working Paper Series 1383, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Newbery, David M. & Biggar, Darryl R., 2024. "Marginal curtailment of wind and solar PV: Transmission constraints, pricing and access regimes for efficient investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Simshauser, Paul & Newbery, David, 2024. "Non-firm vs priority access: On the long run average and marginal costs of renewables in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Simshauser, Paul, 2021. "Renewable Energy Zones in Australia's National Electricity Market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Georg Thomaßen & Thomas Bruckner, 2024. "Resource Adequacy through Operating Reserve Demand Curves: Design Options and their Impact on the Market Equilibrium," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(3), pages 125-152, May.
    12. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Environmental Impacts of Redispatching in Decarbonizing Electricity Systems: A Spanish Case Study," Working Papers 1-2023, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    13. Kim, James Hyungkwan & Millstein, Dev & Wiser, Ryan & Mulvaney-Kemp, Julie, 2024. "Renewable-battery hybrid power plants in congested electricity markets: Implications for plant configuration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    14. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn C. & Kröger, Mats, 2023. "Reacting to changing paradigms: How and why to reform electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Grimm, Veronika & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2022. "Emissions reduction in a second-best world: On the long-term effects of overlapping regulations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Heilmann, Erik & Klempp, Nikolai & Wetzel, Heike, 2020. "Design of regional flexibility markets for electricity: A product classification framework for and application to German pilot projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Holmberg, Pär & Tangerås, Thomas & Ahlqvist, Victor, 2018. "Central- versus Self-Dispatch in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 1257, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 27 Mar 2019.
    19. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Uz, Dilek & Sevindik, Irem, 2022. "How do variable renewable energy technologies affect firm-level day-ahead output decisions: Evidence from the Turkish wholesale electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Morell-Dameto, Nicolás & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Gómez San Román, Tomás & Dueñas-Martínez, Pablo & Schittekatte, Tim, 2024. "Network tariff design with flexible customers: Ex-post pricing and a local network capacity market for customer response coordination," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Congestion management; Zonal pricing; Countertrading; Redispatch; Real-time market; Regulatory arbitrage; Inc-dec game;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabeth Gustafsson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iuiiise.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.