IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2352.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) for Electricity in Europe? The Untold Story

Author

Listed:
  • Pollitt, M. G.

Abstract

Locational marginal prices (LMPs) are an important design feature of several well-developed electricity markets, particularly in the US. They involve the calculation of energy prices which reflect congestion and losses at particular nodes in the electricity network. They have been hotly debated in Australia and Great Britain, but not implemented so far. In this paper we explore whether and how European countries should adopt LMPs. We consider the concept of locational prices and their use in economics and the theory and evidence on nodal pricing. We discuss key unanswered questions in the literature about nodal pricing before suggesting alternative actions to improve locational signals in the electricity system in Europe, including via the smarter use of LMPs. We conclude that while the theory and modelling behind LMPs is strong, their wider theoretical rationale is less clear cut and the evidence on their impact in use is surprisingly weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Pollitt, M. G., 2023. "Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) for Electricity in Europe? The Untold Story," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2352, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2352
    Note: mgp20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research-files/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe2352.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. David P. Brown & Jay Zarnikau & Chi-Keung Woo, 2020. "Does locational marginal pricing impact generation investment location decisions? An analysis of Texas’s wholesale electricity market," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 99-140, December.
    3. Eicke, Anselm & Khanna, Tarun & Hirth, Lion, 2020. "Locational investment signals - How to steer the siting of new generation capacity in power systems?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 41(6), pages 281-304.
    4. Newbery, David M, 1990. "Pricing and Congestion: Economic Principles Relevant to Pricing Roads," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 22-38, Summer.
    5. Lundin, Erik, 2022. "Geographic price granularity and investments in wind power: Evidence from a Swedish electricity market splitting reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Kahn, Matthew E. & Mansur, Erin T., 2013. "Do local energy prices and regulation affect the geographic concentration of employment?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 105-114.
    7. Jeff Opgrand, Paul V. Preckel, Douglas J. Gotham, and Andrew L. Liu, 2022. "Price Formation in Auctions for Financial Transmission Rights," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    8. Christoph Graf & Federico Quaglia & Frank A. Wolak, 2020. "Simplified Electricity Market Models with Significant Intermittent Renewable Capacity: Evidence from Italy," NBER Working Papers 27262, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Adamson, Seabron & Noe, Thomas & Parker, Geoffrey, 2010. "Efficiency of financial transmission rights markets in centrally coordinated periodic auctions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 771-778, July.
    10. Jean-Michel Glachant & Paul L. Joskow & Michael G. Pollitt (ed.), 2021. "Handbook on Electricity Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18895.
    11. Dütschke, Elisabeth & Paetz, Alexandra-Gwyn, 2013. "Dynamic electricity pricing—Which programs do consumers prefer?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 226-234.
    12. Kelly L. Haws & William O. Bearden, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(3), pages 304-311, October.
    13. Hogan, William W, 1992. "Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 211-242, September.
    14. Frank A. Wolak, 2011. "Measuring the Benefits of Greater Spatial Granularity in Short-Term Pricing in Wholesale Electricity Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 247-252, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pollitt, Michael G. & von der Fehr, Nils-Henrik M. & Willems, Bert & Banet, Catherine & Le Coq, Chloé & Chyong, Chi Kong, 2024. "Recommendations for a future-proof electricity market design in Europe in light of the 2021-23 energy crisis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Holmberg, Pär, 2024. "The Inc-Dec Game and How to Mitigate It," Working Paper Series 1512, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Katzen, Matthew & Leslie, Gordon W., 2024. "Siting and operating incentives in electrical networks: A study of mispricing in zonal markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Lundin, Erik, 2022. "Geographic price granularity and investments in wind power: Evidence from a Swedish electricity market splitting reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Triolo, Ryan C. & Wolak, Frank A., 2022. "Quantifying the benefits of a nodal market design in the Texas electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Gauthier, Geneviève & Godin, Frédéric & Trudeau, Gabrielle, 2023. "Pricing inconsistency between the futures and Financial Transmission Right markets in North America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Leslie, Gordon W., 2021. "Who benefits from ratepayer-funded auctions of transmission congestion contracts? Evidence from New York," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    9. Bjoern Felten & Jessica Raasch & Christoph Weber, 2017. "Photovoltaics and Heat Pumps - Limitations of Local Pricing Mechanisms," EWL Working Papers 1702, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Feb 2017.
    10. Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Johannes Knörr & Felipe Maldonado & Paul Schott & Stefan Waldherr & Martin Weibelzahl, 2022. "Electricity Markets in a Time of Change: A Call to Arms for Business Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 77-102, March.
    11. Sonnsjö, Hannes, 2024. "What we talk about when we talk about electricity: A thematic analysis of recent political debates on Swedish electricity supply," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Deng, Shi-Jie & Oren, Shmuel & Meliopoulos, A.P., 2010. "The inherent inefficiency of simultaneously feasible financial transmission rights auctions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 779-785, July.
    13. Ruderer, Dominik & Zöttl, Gregor, 2018. "Transmission pricing and investment incentives," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 14-30.
    14. Grimm, Veronika & Orlinskaya, Galina & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "Optimal design of retailer-prosumer electricity tariffs using bilevel optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Ruderer, D., 2012. "The Impact of Transmission Pricing in Network Industries," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1230, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Wu, Zhongqun & Zheng, Ruijin, 2022. "Research on the impact of financial transmission rights on transmission expansion: A system dynamics model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    17. Lété, Quentin & Smeers, Yves & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2022. "An analysis of zonal electricity pricing from a long-term perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Pollitt, Michael G. & von der Fehr, Nils-Henrik M. & Willems, Bert & Banet, Catherine & Le Coq, Chloé & Chyong, Chi Kong, 2024. "Recommendations for a future-proof electricity market design in Europe in light of the 2021-23 energy crisis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Benjamin F. Hobbs & Fieke A.M. Rijkers & Maroeska G. Boots, 2005. "The More Cooperation, The More Competition? A Cournot Analysis of the Benefits of Electric Market Coupling," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 69-98.
    20. Karsten Neuhoff, 2002. "Optimal congestion treatment for bilateral electricity trading," Working Papers EP05, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    LMPs; nodal pricing; electricity markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.