IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v232y2024ics0960148124011388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable-battery hybrid power plants in congested electricity markets: Implications for plant configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, James Hyungkwan
  • Millstein, Dev
  • Wiser, Ryan
  • Mulvaney-Kemp, Julie

Abstract

Examining coupled renewable-battery power plants (“hybrids”) in congested areas provides insights into a future of increased wind and solar penetration. Our study focuses on two types of congested regions, Variable Renewable Energy (VRE)-rich Areas and Load Centers, and explores likely plant configuration choices for developers and transmission network planners. This paper examines how hybrid value, comprising energy and capacity value, varies by plant configuration and congested region type considering factors such as storage duration, battery degradation, and ability to charge from the grid. We select plant locations from across the seven main U.S. independent system operators (ISOs). Hybrid value for each configuration is computed based on profit-maximizing plant operation given perfect foresight, according to observed wholesale power market real time prices from 2018 to 2021. In VRE-rich Areas, the median increase in energy value from extending storage duration from one to 4 h is 29.4 % for solar and 26.8 % for wind, assuming low battery degradation costs and storage sized to 100 % of the plant's nameplate generation capacity. Increasing storage duration beyond 4 h does not substantially increase its value from energy markets, even in VRE-rich Areas. We find that solar hybrids reach a 90 % capacity credit with 4 h of storage, while wind hybrids require 8 h of storage, based on the capacity factor of each hybrid during the top 100 net load hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, James Hyungkwan & Millstein, Dev & Wiser, Ryan & Mulvaney-Kemp, Julie, 2024. "Renewable-battery hybrid power plants in congested electricity markets: Implications for plant configuration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:232:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124011388
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124011388
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denholm, Paul & Nunemaker, Jacob & Gagnon, Pieter & Cole, Wesley, 2020. "The potential for battery energy storage to provide peaking capacity in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1269-1277.
    2. Denholm, Paul & Mai, Trieu, 2019. "Timescales of energy storage needed for reducing renewable energy curtailment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 388-399.
    3. Mills, Andrew D. & Rodriguez, Pía, 2020. "A simple and fast algorithm for estimating the capacity credit of solar and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Castillejo-Cuberos, A. & Cardemil, J.M. & Escobar, R., 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of photovoltaic plants considering high temporal resolution and non-linear dynamics of battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    5. Gorman, Will & Montañés, Cristina Crespo & Mills, Andrew & Kim, James Hyungkwan & Millstein, Dev & Wiser, Ryan, 2022. "Are coupled renewable-battery power plants more valuable than independently sited installations?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. William A. Braff & Joshua M. Mueller & Jessika E. Trancik, 2016. "Value of storage technologies for wind and solar energy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 964-969, October.
    7. Eicke, Anselm & Khanna, Tarun & Hirth, Lion, 2020. "Locational investment signals - How to steer the siting of new generation capacity in power systems?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 41(6), pages 281-304.
    8. Kim, James Hyungkwan & Mills, Andrew D. & Wiser, Ryan & Bolinger, Mark & Gorman, Will & Crespo Montañes, Cristina & O'Shaughnessy, Eric, 2021. "Project developer options to enhance the value of solar electricity as solar and storage penetrations increase," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    9. Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J. & Moore, J. & Horowitz, I., 2011. "Wind generation and zonal-market price divergence: Evidence from Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 3928-3938, July.
    10. Noah Kittner & Felix Lill & Daniel M. Kammen, 2017. "Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 1-6, September.
    11. Schleifer, Anna H. & Murphy, Caitlin A. & Cole, Wesley J. & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "Exploring the design space of PV-plus-battery system configurations under evolving grid conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    12. Piotr F. Borowski, 2020. "Zonal and Nodal Models of Energy Market in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Anselm Eicke & Tarun Khanna & Lion Hirth, 2020. "Locational Investment Signals: How to Steer the Siting of New Generation Capacity in Power Systems?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(6), pages 281-304, November.
    14. Ross, Martin T., 2018. "The future of the electricity industry: Implications of trends and taxes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 393-409.
    15. James Hyungkwan Kim & Mark Bolinger & Andrew D. Mills & Ryan Wiser, 2023. "Rethinking the Role of Financial Transmission Rights in Wind-Rich Electricity Markets in the Central U.S," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(6), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gorman, Will & Montañés, Cristina Crespo & Mills, Andrew & Kim, James Hyungkwan & Millstein, Dev & Wiser, Ryan, 2022. "Are coupled renewable-battery power plants more valuable than independently sited installations?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Eikeland, Odin Foldvik & Kelsall, Colin C. & Buznitsky, Kyle & Verma, Shomik & Bianchi, Filippo Maria & Chiesa, Matteo & Henry, Asegun, 2023. "Power availability of PV plus thermal batteries in real-world electric power grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Merrick, James H. & Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2024. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Newbery, David M. & Biggar, Darryl R., 2024. "Marginal curtailment of wind and solar PV: Transmission constraints, pricing and access regimes for efficient investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Dan Tong & David J. Farnham & Lei Duan & Qiang Zhang & Nathan S. Lewis & Ken Caldeira & Steven J. Davis, 2021. "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Meng, Jinhao & Cai, Lei & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Ma, Junpeng & Luo, Guangzhao & Teodorescu, Remus, 2020. "An optimized ensemble learning framework for lithium-ion Battery State of Health estimation in energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Müller, Simon C. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 492-503.
    8. He, Guannan & Ciez, Rebecca & Moutis, Panayiotis & Kar, Soummya & Whitacre, Jay F., 2020. "The economic end of life of electrochemical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Simshauser, Paul & Newbery, David, 2024. "Non-firm vs priority access: On the long run average and marginal costs of renewables in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Murphy, C.A. & Schleifer, A. & Eurek, K., 2021. "A taxonomy of systems that combine utility-scale renewable energy and energy storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Mai, Trieu & Bistline, John & Sun, Yinong & Cole, Wesley & Marcy, Cara & Namovicz, Chris & Young, David, 2018. "The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the U.S. electricity system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 313-324.
    12. Qin, Chao (Chris) & Loth, Eric, 2021. "Isothermal compressed wind energy storage using abandoned oil/gas wells or coal mines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. Bistline, John E.T. & Young, David T., 2020. "Emissions impacts of future battery storage deployment on regional power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    14. Georg Thomaßen & Thomas Bruckner, 2024. "Resource Adequacy through Operating Reserve Demand Curves: Design Options and their Impact on the Market Equilibrium," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(3), pages 125-152, May.
    15. Jafari, Mehdi & Korpås, Magnus & Botterud, Audun, 2020. "Power system decarbonization: Impacts of energy storage duration and interannual renewables variability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1171-1185.
    16. Schleifer, Anna H. & Murphy, Caitlin A. & Cole, Wesley J. & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "Exploring the design space of PV-plus-battery system configurations under evolving grid conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    17. Xu, Jiuping & Liu, Tingting, 2020. "Technological paradigm-based approaches towards challenges and policy shifts for sustainable wind energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    18. Gulam Smdani & Muhammad Remanul Islam & Ahmad Naim Ahmad Yahaya & Sairul Izwan Bin Safie, 2023. "Performance Evaluation Of Advanced Energy Storage Systems: A Review," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 1094-1141, June.
    19. Ma, Huan & Sun, Qinghan & Chen, Lei & Chen, Qun & Zhao, Tian & He, Kelun & Xu, Fei & Min, Yong & Wang, Shunjiang & Zhou, Guiping, 2023. "Cogeneration transition for energy system decarbonization: From basic to flexible and complementary multi-energy sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Kim, Yong Soon & Park, Gye Hyun & Kim, Seung Wan & Kim, Dam, 2024. "Incentive design for hybrid energy storage system investment to PV owners considering value of grid services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:232:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124011388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.