IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04487407.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evénement et temporalité en gestion : implication pour les pratiques d'anticipation

Author

Listed:
  • Bettina Bouchayer

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM])

Abstract

Si l'anticipation est orientée vers un futur inconnu, une discussion sur des pratiques managériales ne devrait-elle pas interroger la temporalité sous-tendant les courants de gestion. L'évolution de la recherche vers des approches « processuelles » reste basée sur une logique de temps linéaire avec un focus sur une description orientée vers le passé, contrairement au besoin d'anticipation orienté vers le futur. Nous proposons une analyse des concepts temporels des courants classiques de la recherche organisationnelle pour mieux en comprendre les conséquences onto-épistémologiques induites et pour discuter l'intérêt théorique d'une conception de l'événement qui associe une partie factuelle et une partie symbolique. L'objectif sera de rendre visible l'écart dans la littérature existante et de contribuer, au travers d'une conception innovante de l'événement, à répondre à la demande du courant de la recherche organisationnelle de théorisation temporelle plus dynamique pour conserver et créer des capacités d'agir dans le futur.

Suggested Citation

  • Bettina Bouchayer, 2023. "Evénement et temporalité en gestion : implication pour les pratiques d'anticipation," Post-Print hal-04487407, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04487407
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04487407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04487407/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saouré Kouamé & Ann Langley, 2018. "Relating microprocesses to macro‐outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 559-581, March.
    2. Laurent Mirabeau & Steve Maguire & Cynthia Hardy, 2018. "Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 582-605, March.
    3. Tuttle, Dale B., 1997. "A classification system for understanding individual differences in temporal orientation among processual researchers and organizational informants," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 349-366, December.
    4. Paula Jarzabkowski, 2003. "Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 23-55, January.
    5. Sarpong, David & Eyres, Eve & Batsakis, Georgios, 2019. "Narrating the future: A distentive capability approach to strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 105-114.
    6. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    7. Tsedal B. Neeley & Paul M. Leonardi, 2018. "Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 922-946, March.
    8. Robert A. Burgelman & Steven W. Floyd & Tomi Laamanen & Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara & Richard Whittington, 2018. "Strategy processes and practices: Dialogues and intersections," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 531-558, March.
    9. Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2002. "It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 684-700, December.
    10. Poole, Marshall Scott & Van de Ven, Andrew H. & Dooley, Kevin & Holmes, Michael E., 2000. "Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195131987.
    11. Elena P. Antonacopoulou & Ted Fuller, 2020. "Practising entrepreneuring as emplacement: the impact of sensation and anticipation in entrepreneurial action," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3-4), pages 257-280, March.
    12. Andrew H. van de Ven & George P. Huber, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 213-219, August.
    13. Martha S. Feldman, 2004. "Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 295-309, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    2. Tomi Laamanen, 2019. "Dynamic attention-based view of corporate headquarters in MNCs," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mäntymäki, Matti & Turunen, Marja, 2019. "Why do blockchains split? An actor-network perspective on Bitcoin splits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Markus Reihlen & Jan‐Florian Schlapfner & Monika Seeger & Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich, 2022. "Strategic Venturing as Legitimacy Creation: The Case of Sustainability," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 417-459, March.
    5. Parrish, Bradley D., 2010. "Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 510-523, September.
    6. Sylvain Mondon, 2019. "Transformations organisationnelles, développement durable et temporalités d'action, un cas d'adaptation au changement climatique," Post-Print halshs-02967382, HAL.
    7. Alistair R. Anderson, 2015. "Conceptualising entrepreneurship as economic 'explanation' and the consequent loss of 'understanding'," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 145-157.
    8. Cheriet, F., 2010. "L'utilisation des études de cas pour analyser les coopérations inter-entreprises : des justifications méthodologiques au pragmatisme empirique," Working Papers MoISA 201002, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    9. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Godfrey Mugurusi & Lydia Bals, 2017. "A processual analysis of the purchasing and supply organization in transition: the impact of offshoring," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 64-83, June.
    11. Peng, Songlan & van der Laan Smith, Joyce, 2010. "Chinese GAAP and IFRS: An analysis of the convergence process," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 16-34.
    12. Gina Colarelli O'Connor & Mark P. Rice & Lois Peters & Robert W. Veryzer, 2003. "Managing Interdisciplinary, Longitudinal Research Teams: Extending Grounded Theory-Building Methodologies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 353-373, August.
    13. Metsola, Jaakko & Leppäaho, Tanja & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, Eriikka & Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella, 2020. "Process in family business internationalisation: The state of the art and ways forward," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    14. Kohtamäki, Marko & Heimonen, Jesse & Sjödin, David & Heikkilä, Vili, 2020. "Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 12-25.
    15. Stella Pachidi & Hans Berends & Samer Faraj & Marleen Huysman, 2021. "Make Way for the Algorithms: Symbolic Actions and Change in a Regime of Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 18-41, January.
    16. Burt, George & Nair, Anup Karath, 2020. "Rigidities of imagination in scenario planning: Strategic foresight through ‘Unlearning’," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Fengbin Wang & Xue Zhang, 2020. "Microstructures and dynamic processes within the five-phase system: regarding COVID-19 as a complex system," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Frank Boons & Wouter Spekkink & Wenting Jiao, 2014. "A Process Perspective on Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 341-355, May.
    19. Martin David & Sophia Schönborn, 2018. "Bottom-Up Energy Transition Narratives: Linking the Global with the Local? A Comparison of Three German Renewable Co-Ops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Denis Frydrych & Adam J. Bock, 2018. "Bring the Noize: Syndicate and Role-Identity Co-Creation During Crowdfunding," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04487407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.