IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04466127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Combiner Bien-Être Au Travail Et Performance : Une Lecture Par Les High Performance Work Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Bernard

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019], UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

The purpose of our contribution is to identify factors for resolving the paradox between well-being at work and corporate performance. Our approach based on high performance work practices provides a way to resolve the paradox between well-being at work and company performance. Based on a questionnaire sent to 1500 companies, we analysed how high-performance human resources practices impacted well-being at work on the one hand and corporate performance on the other. We were thus able to determine the practices that make it possible to combine well-being at work and corporate performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Bernard, 2019. "Combiner Bien-Être Au Travail Et Performance : Une Lecture Par Les High Performance Work Practices," Post-Print hal-04466127, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04466127
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04466127v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04466127v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12153 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Harvie Ramsay & Dora Scholarios & Bill Harley, 2000. "Employees and High‐Performance Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 501-531, December.
    3. Mihail, Dimitrios M. & Kloutsiniotis, Panagiotis V., 2016. "The effects of high-performance work systems on hospital employees' work-related well-being: Evidence from Greece," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 424-438.
    4. Sinikka Vanhala & Kaija Tuomi, 2006. "HRM, Company Performance and Employee Well-being," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(3), pages 241-255.
    5. Peter Cappelli & David Neumark, 2001. "Do “High-Performance†Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 737-775, July.
    6. John Zelenski & Steven Murphy & David Jenkins, 2008. "The Happy-Productive Worker Thesis Revisited," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 521-537, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petri Böckerman & Pekka Ilmakunnas, 2012. "The Job Satisfaction-Productivity Nexus: A Study Using Matched Survey and Register Data," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(2), pages 244-262, April.
    2. Laura Peutere & Antti Saloniemi & Petri Böckerman & Simo Aho & Jouko Nätti & Tapio Nummi, 2022. "High-involvement management practices and the productivity of firms: Detecting industry heterogeneity," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 853-876, May.
    3. Pagán-Castaño, E. & Maseda-Moreno, A. & Santos-Rojo, C., 2020. "Wellbeing in work environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 469-474.
    4. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Mª del Mar Ramos-González & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Do High Performance Work Systems Improve Workplace Well-Being in SMES? Implications for Financial Performance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1287-1309, June.
    5. Laetitia Hauret & Ludivine Martin & Nessrine Omrani & Donald R Williams, 2022. "How do HRM practices improve employee satisfaction?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 972-996, May.
    6. Jyoti, Jeevan & Rani, Asha, 2019. "Role of burnout and mentoring between high performance work system and intention to leave: Moderated mediation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 166-176.
    7. Kloutsiniotis, Panagiotis V. & Mihail, Dimitrios M., 2020. "Is it worth it? Linking perceived high-performance work systems and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of job demands and job resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 565-579.
    8. Jody Hoffer Gittell & Rob Seidner & Julian Wimbush, 2010. "A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 490-506, April.
    9. Ludivine Martin, 2017. "Do Innovative Work Practices and Use of Information and Communication Technologies Motivate Employees?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 263-292, April.
    10. Alex Bryson & Michael White, 2011. "HRM and Workplace Motivation: Incremental and Threshold Effects," CEP Discussion Papers dp1097, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. Laura Peutere & Antti Saloniemi & Simo Aho & Jouko Nätti & Tapio Nummi, 2018. "High-involvement management practices, job control, and employee well-being in the public and private sectors. Evidence from Finland," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(4), pages 467-486, November.
    12. Ali Murat BOYRAZ & Hatice ÖZUTKU, 2019. "Yüksek Performanslı Çalışma Sistemlerinin Algılanan Örgütsel Performans ve Finansal Performansa Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 248-283, November.
    13. Nathalie Greenan & Ekaterina Kalugina & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2014. "Has the quality of working life improved in the EU-15 between 1995 and 2005?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(2), pages 399-428.
    14. Ariel C. Avgar & Niti Pandey & Kiwook Kwon, 2012. "Discretion in Context: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Relationship between Discretion and Turnover Intentions," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 106-128, January.
    15. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Sebastiano, Antonio & Belvedere, Valeria & Grando, Alberto & Giangreco, Antonio, 2017. "The effect of capacity management strategies on employees' well-being: A quantitative investigation into the long-term healthcare industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 563-573.
    17. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    18. Merja Kauhanen & Jouko Nätti, 2015. "Involuntary Temporary and Part-Time Work, Job Quality and Well-Being at Work," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 783-799, February.
    19. Alex Bryson & Lucy Stokes & David Wilkinson, 2023. "Is pupil attainment higher in well-managed schools?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    20. Elham Faez & Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian & Kamal Azam & Kyle Hancock & John Rosecrance, 2021. "An Assessment of Ergonomics Climate and Its Association with Self-Reported Pain, Organizational Performance and Employee Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04466127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.