IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03063845.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contribution de la méthode sociocratique à la décision ?

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Carbonnel

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

Face aux tensions entre centralisation et partage de la décision que nourrissent nombre de travaux dans la littérature, c'est dans le cadre théorique de l'agir communicationnel (Habermas, 1987) que cette étude est réalisée, pour examiner dans quelle mesure la méthode sociocratique pourrait-elle contribuer à l'émergence de nouvelles représentations de la décision (Laroche, 1995) ? Nous examinons cette question à partir d'une recherche intervention (David, 2000) où la méthode sociocratique formalisée par Gerard Endenburg (1988) est utilisée pour faciliter l'émergence d'une SCIC alimentaire et d'autres activités (bar, détente, bien être, recyclerie). L'étude toujours en cours, est réalisée sur le terrain en binôme avec une stagiaire (chef d'entreprise depuis vingt ans) , issue de la dernière promotion d'une formation en intelligence relationnelle, organisationnelle et collective que nous avons créée à l'université de Lorraine. Nous évoquons les difficultés de la participation aux décisions et l'idéal d'agir communicationnel, qui pourrait être servi par la sociocratie, pour un renouveau de la participation aux décisions ; suivent la présentation du terrain, la méthodologie de recherche intervention basée sur une démarche ethnographique organisationnelle (Rix-Lièvre, Lièvre, 2013) et notre posture constructiviste ; l'exposé des résultats conduit à dégager dans le contexte étudié, des caractéristiques thématiques, organisationnelles et individuelles qui facilitent ou freinent la mise en œuvre de la sociocratie, constituant ainsi un apport managérial potentiel pour contribuer au renouvellement des représentations de la décision.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Carbonnel, 2018. "Contribution de la méthode sociocratique à la décision ?," Post-Print hal-03063845, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03063845
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03063845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03063845/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Laroche, 1995. "From Decision to Action in Organizations: Decision-Making as a Social Representation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-75, February.
    2. A. Georges L. Romme & Gerard Endenburg, 2006. "Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 287-297, April.
    3. Jacqueline de Bony, 2007. "Le consensus aux Pays-Bas. Autonomie individuelle et coopération," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 170(1), pages 45-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coget, Jean-Francois & Haag, Christophe & Gibson, Donald E., 2011. "Anger and fear in decision-making: The case of film directors on set," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 476-490.
    2. Raphaël Didier, 2022. "A community's resilience to the COVID-19 crisis - The Florain monetary community," Working Papers hal-03641952, HAL.
    3. Jacqueline de Bony, 2011. "Un projet partenarial porté par un centre social : entre action sociale et politique," Working Papers halshs-00659912, HAL.
    4. Michele Franco & Cida Sanches, 2016. "Influence of Emotions on Decision-Making," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(1), pages 40-62, January.
    5. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    6. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    7. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Denise M. Rousseau, 2009. "Bridging the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening!," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 534-546, May.
    8. Patriotta, Gerardo & Spedale, Simona, 2011. "Micro-interaction dynamics in group decision making: Face games, interaction order and boundary work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 362-374.
    9. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    10. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1998. "Representations And Influence Processes In Groups: Towards A Socio-Cognitive Perspective On Cognition In Organization," Post-Print hal-01490579, HAL.
    11. Emil Velinov, 2017. "The Relationship between Contemporary Holacratic Models of Management and Company Performance: Evidence from Global Corporations in the World," GATR Journals gjbssr462, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    13. David Lamelas & José Lamelas & José Filipe, 2015. "Organizational Design Redefined by Design Thinking. Case studies in the hotel industry," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 5(4), pages 959-959.
    14. Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2012. "Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 289-306, February.
    15. Muhammad Nadeem Shahzad & Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi & Waqar Ali, 2020. "Relationship of Principals Academic Decision-Making Practices with Faculty Morale: A Study of Colleges in Punjab," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 5(1), pages 376-385, March.
    16. Yashar Mansoori & Martin Lackéus, 2020. "Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 791-818, March.
    17. Serdukov, Svetlana, 2012. "From the chaos of transition economy to “normalized” managerial practices: The role of group interaction in creating meaning in managerial work," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(4), pages 423-444.
    18. Matuschek, Ingo & Kleemann, Frank, 2019. "Konzertierte Verunsicherung angesichts Industrie 4.0 - Herausforderungen für die betriebliche Sozialpartnerschaft [Concerted uncertainty in the face of industry 4.0 - challenges for codeterminatio," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(2), pages 189-206.
    19. A. Georges L. Romme, 2019. "Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Gilsing, V.A. & van Burg, E. & Romme, A.G.L., 2010. "Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs," Other publications TiSEM 4f828c53-0ac2-4ea7-9f90-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03063845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.