IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdp/dpaper/0055.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

E-Learning at Universities: Does Starting with Difficult Questions Affect Student Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Agata Galkiewicz
  • Jan Marcus
  • Thomas Siedler

Abstract

To reduce cheating in written tests and exams, assessors often randomly vary the order of questions across students. However, little is known about the potential unintended side effects of question order. This paper examines whether randomizing students to start with an easier or harder question makes a difference to overall assessment performance in incentivized testing situations under time pressure. Using data from more than 8,000 online tests and exams administered in econometrics and statistics courses at two of Germany's largest universities, we find no evidence that the difficulty of the first question(s) has an effect on overall assessment performance. Our findings are good news for people designing (online) assessments, because randomizing the order of questions can be used as an effective tool to mitigate cheating, but does not affect students' overall performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Agata Galkiewicz & Jan Marcus & Thomas Siedler, 2024. "E-Learning at Universities: Does Starting with Difficult Questions Affect Student Performance?," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0055, Berlin School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0055
    DOI: 10.48462/opus4-5657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/5657/BSoE_DP_0055.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48462/opus4-5657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; university students; question order; randomization; e-learning; teaching of economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdpemde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.