IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2501.13346.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Markovian Search with Socially Aware Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Aminian
  • Vahideh Manshadi
  • Rad Niazadeh

Abstract

We study a general class of sequential search problems for selecting multiple candidates from different societal groups under "ex-ante constraints" aimed at producing socially desirable outcomes, such as demographic parity, diversity quotas, or subsidies for disadvantaged groups. Starting with the canonical Pandora's box model [Weitzman, 1978] under a single affine constraint on selection and inspection probabilities, we show that the optimal constrained policy retains an index-based structure similar to the unconstrained case, but may randomize between two dual-based adjustments that are both easy to compute and economically interpretable. We then extend our results to handle multiple affine constraints by reducing the problem to a variant of the exact Carath\'eodory problem and providing a novel polynomial-time algorithm to generate an optimal randomized dual-adjusted index-based policy that satisfies all constraints simultaneously. Building on these insights, we consider richer search processes (e.g., search with rejection and multistage search) modeled by joint Markov scheduling (JMS) [Dumitriu et al., 2003; Gittins, 1979]. By imposing general affine and convex ex-ante constraints, we develop a primal-dual algorithm that randomizes over a polynomial number of dual-based adjustments to the unconstrained JMS Gittins indices, yielding a near-feasible, near-optimal policy. Our approach relies on the key observation that a suitable relaxation of the Lagrange dual function for these constrained problems admits index-based policies akin to those in the unconstrained setting. Using a numerical study, we investigate the implications of imposing various constraints, in particular the utilitarian loss (price of fairness), and whether these constraints induce their intended societally desirable outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Aminian & Vahideh Manshadi & Rad Niazadeh, 2025. "Markovian Search with Socially Aware Constraints," Papers 2501.13346, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.13346
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Welch, Finis, 1976. "Employment Quotas for Minorities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(4), pages 105-139, August.
    2. Weitzman, Martin L, 1979. "Optimal Search for the Best Alternative," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(3), pages 641-654, May.
    3. Shaojie Tang & Jing Yuan, 2023. "Beyond submodularity: a unified framework of randomized set selection with group fairness constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Maxime C. Cohen & Adam N. Elmachtoub & Xiao Lei, 2022. "Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8536-8552, December.
    5. Yuanguang Zhong & Zhichao Zheng & Mabel C. Chou & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2018. "Resource Pooling and Allocation Policies to Deliver Differentiated Service," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1555-1573, April.
    6. Mark Armstrong, 2017. "Ordered Consumer Search," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(5), pages 989-1024.
    7. Doval, Laura, 2018. "Whether or not to open Pandora's box," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 127-158.
    8. Yuan Gao & Christian Kroer, 2023. "Infinite-Dimensional Fisher Markets and Tractable Fair Division," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 688-707, March.
    9. Kaneko, Mamoru & Nakamura, Kenjiro, 1979. "The Nash Social Welfare Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 423-435, March.
    10. Daniel Adelman & Adam J. Mersereau, 2008. "Relaxations of Weakly Coupled Stochastic Dynamic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 712-727, June.
    11. Arash Asadpour & Rad Niazadeh & Amin Saberi & Ali Shameli, 2023. "Sequential Submodular Maximization and Applications to Ranking an Assortment of Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1154-1170, July.
    12. Raj Chetty & John N Friedman & Emmanuel Saez & Nicholas Turner & Danny Yagan, 2020. "Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(3), pages 1567-1633.
    13. Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 991-1013, September.
    14. Shipra Agrawal & Zizhuo Wang & Yinyu Ye, 2014. "A Dynamic Near-Optimal Algorithm for Online Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 876-890, August.
    15. Will Ma & David Simchi-Levi, 2020. "Algorithms for Online Matching, Assortment, and Pricing with Tight Weight-Dependent Competitive Ratios," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1787-1803, November.
    16. Xiao-Yue Gong & Vineet Goyal & Garud N. Iyengar & David Simchi-Levi & Rajan Udwani & Shuangyu Wang, 2022. "Online Assortment Optimization with Reusable Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4772-4785, July.
    17. Rad Niazadeh & Negin Golrezaei & Joshua Wang & Fransisca Susan & Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, 2023. "Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3797-3817, July.
    18. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2012. "On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2234-2250, December.
    19. Niv Buchbinder & Joseph (Seffi) Naor, 2009. "Online Primal-Dual Algorithms for Covering and Packing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 270-286, May.
    20. Yiding Feng & Rad Niazadeh & Amin Saberi, 2024. "Two-Stage Stochastic Matching and Pricing with Applications to Ride Hailing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 1574-1594, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziv Scully & Laura Doval, 2024. "Local hedging approximately solves Pandora's box problems with nonobligatory inspection," Papers 2410.19011, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    2. Hedyeh Beyhaghi & Linda Cai, 2023. "Recent Developments in Pandora's Box Problem: Variants and Applications," Papers 2308.12242, arXiv.org.
    3. Petrikaitė, Vaiva, 2022. "Escaping search when buying," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Rafael P. Greminger, 2022. "Optimal Search and Discovery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3904-3924, May.
    5. Chen, Yanbin & Li, Sanxi & Lin, Kai & Yu, Jun, 2021. "Consumer search with blind buying," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 402-427.
    6. Greminger, Rafael, 2019. "Optimal Search and Awareness Expansion," Other publications TiSEM ac47e6ff-42a4-4d70-addd-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. T. Tony Ke & Song Lin, 2020. "Informational Complementarity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3699-3716, August.
    8. Rafael P. Greminger, 2019. "Optimal Search and Discovery," Papers 1911.07773, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    9. Greminger, Rafael, 2019. "Optimal Search and Awareness Expansion," Discussion Paper 2019-034, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Grenet, Julien & He, YingHua & Kübler, Dorothea, 2022. "Preference Discovery in University Admissions: The Case for Dynamic Multioffer Mechanisms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 130(6), pages 1-1.
    11. Pak Hung Au & Mark Whitmeyer, 2018. "Attraction versus Persuasion: Information Provision in Search Markets," Papers 1802.09396, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    12. Lyu, Chen, 2023. "Information design for selling search goods and the effect of competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Brishti Guha & Prabal Roy Chowdhury, 2015. "Affirmative action in the presence of a creamy layer," Discussion Papers 15-06, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    14. Giovanni Compiani & Gregory Lewis & Sida Peng & Peichun Wang, 2024. "Online Search and Optimal Product Rankings: An Empirical Framework," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 615-636, May.
    15. Rustamdjan Hakimov & Dorothea Kübler & Siqi Pan, 2023. "Costly information acquisition in centralized matching markets," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), pages 1447-1490, November.
    16. Guha, Brishti & Roy Chowdhury, Prabal, 2017. "Affirmative Action in the Presence of a Creamy Layer: Identity or Class Based?," MPRA Paper 78686, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Murali Agastya & Oleksii Birulin, 2023. "Optimal Task Scheduling under Adverse Selection and Hidden Actions," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 660-698, May.
    18. Manuel Mueller-Frank & Mallesh M. Pai, 2016. "Social Learning with Costly Search," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 83-109, February.
    19. Haan, Marco A. & Moraga-González, José L. & Petrikaitė, Vaiva, 2018. "A model of directed consumer search," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 223-255.
    20. Mustafa Dogan & Ju Hu, 2022. "Consumer search and optimal information," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 386-403, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.