IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2411.09771.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bayesian estimation of finite mixtures of Tobit models

Author

Listed:
  • Caio Waisman

Abstract

This paper outlines a Bayesian approach to estimate finite mixtures of Tobit models. The method consists of an MCMC approach that combines Gibbs sampling with data augmentation and is simple to implement. I show through simulations that the flexibility provided by this method is especially helpful when censoring is not negligible. In addition, I demonstrate the broad utility of this methodology with applications to a job training program, labor supply, and demand for medical care. I find that this approach allows for non-trivial additional flexibility that can alter results considerably and beyond improving model fit.

Suggested Citation

  • Caio Waisman, 2024. "Bayesian estimation of finite mixtures of Tobit models," Papers 2411.09771, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.09771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.09771
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wooyong Jo & Sarang Sunder & Jeonghye Choi & Minakshi Trivedi, 2020. "Protecting Consumers from Themselves: Assessing Consequences of Usage Restriction Laws on Online Game Usage and Spending," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 117-133, January.
    2. Thalita do Bem Mattos & Aldo M. Garay & Victor H. Lachos, 2018. "Likelihood-based inference for censored linear regression models with scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 2039-2066, August.
    3. Yan Lu & Debanjan Mitra & David Musto & Sugata Ray, 2020. "Can Brands Circumvent Marketing Regulations? Exploiting Umbrella Branding in Financial Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 71-91, January.
    4. Peter E. Rossi, 2014. "Bayesian Non- and Semi-parametric Methods and Applications," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10259.
    5. Reinaldo Arellano-Valle & Luis Castro & Graciela González-Farías & Karla Muñoz-Gajardo, 2012. "Student-t censored regression model: properties and inference," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(4), pages 453-473, November.
    6. Sylvia. Richardson & Peter J. Green, 1997. "On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 731-792.
    7. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1973. "Regression Analysis when the Dependent Variable is Truncated Normal," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(6), pages 997-1016, November.
    8. Víctor H. Lachos & Celso R. B. Cabral & Marcos O. Prates & Dipak K. Dey, 2019. "Flexible regression modeling for censored data based on mixtures of student-t distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 123-152, March.
    9. Michael Keane & Olena Stavrunova, 2011. "A smooth mixture of Tobits model for healthcare expenditure," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(9), pages 1126-1153, September.
    10. Craig A. Olson, 1998. "A comparison of parametric and semiparametric estimates of the effect of spousal health insurance coverage on weekly hours worked by wives," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(5), pages 543-565.
    11. Jeffrey W. Miller & Matthew T. Harrison, 2018. "Mixture Models With a Prior on the Number of Components," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 340-356, January.
    12. Olsen, Randall J, 1978. "Note on the Uniqueness of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Tobit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(5), pages 1211-1215, September.
    13. Kamel Jedidi & Venkatram Ramaswamy & Wayne Desarbo, 1993. "A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 375-394, September.
    14. Sanjog Misra & Anne Coughlan & Chakravarthi Narasimhan, 2005. "Salesforce Compensation: An Analytical and Empirical Examination of the Agency Theoretic Approach," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 5-39, January.
    15. Ignatius Horstmann & Sridhar Moorthy, 2003. "Advertising Spending and Quality for Services: The Role of Capacity," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 337-365, September.
    16. Deb, Partha & Trivedi, Pravin K, 1997. "Demand for Medical Care by the Elderly: A Finite Mixture Approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 313-336, May-June.
    17. Chib, Siddhartha, 1992. "Bayes inference in the Tobit censored regression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 79-99.
    18. Coughlan, Anne T & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 1992. "An Empirical Analysis of Sales-Force Compensation Plans," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(1), pages 93-121, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Liu & Hyungsik Roger Moon & Frank Schorfheide, 2023. "Forecasting with a panel Tobit model," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 117-159, January.
    2. Im, Yunju & Tan, Aixin, 2021. "Bayesian subgroup analysis in regression using mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Keane, Michael & Stavrunova, Olena, 2016. "Adverse selection, moral hazard and the demand for Medigap insurance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 62-78.
    4. Cintya Lanchimba & Josef Windsperger & Muriel Fadairo, 2018. "Entrepreneurial orientation, risk and incentives: the case of franchising," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 163-180, January.
    5. Ainara González de San Román & Yolanda F. Rebollo‐Sanz, 2018. "An Estimation Of Worker And Firm Effects With Censored Data," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 459-482, October.
    6. David G. McCarthy & Po‐Lin Wang, 2022. "Wait your turn: Pension incentives, workplace rules, and labor supply among Philadelphia municipal workers," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(4), pages 985-1029, December.
    7. Víctor H. Lachos & Celso R. B. Cabral & Marcos O. Prates & Dipak K. Dey, 2019. "Flexible regression modeling for censored data based on mixtures of student-t distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 123-152, March.
    8. Wan-Ju Franz, 2014. "Why are Some Salespeople More Aggressive than Others?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 42(4), pages 383-397, December.
    9. Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter & Gertraud Malsiner-Walli, 2019. "From here to infinity: sparse finite versus Dirichlet process mixtures in model-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 33-64, March.
    10. Arana, Jorge E. & Leon, Carmelo J., 2005. "Flexible mixture distribution modeling of dichotomous choice contingent valuation with heterogenity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 170-188, July.
    11. Sumit Majumdar & Davina Vora & Ashok Nag, 2012. "Legal form of the firm and overseas market choice in India’s software and IT industry," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 659-687, September.
    12. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G, 1999. "Bootstrap Testing in Nonlinear Models," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 40(2), pages 487-508, May.
    13. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Scott, James G. & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2016. "Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using finite mixture random parameters for spatially correlated discrete count data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 492-510.
    14. Weber, Anett & Steiner, Winfried J., 2021. "Modeling price response from retail sales: An empirical comparison of models with different representations of heterogeneity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 843-859.
    15. Aldo M. Garay & Heleno Bolfarine & Victor H. Lachos & Celso R.B. Cabral, 2015. "Bayesian analysis of censored linear regression models with scale mixtures of normal distributions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(12), pages 2694-2714, December.
    16. Jayant Menon & David Greenaway & Chris Milner, 1999. "Industrial Structure and Australia– UK Intra‐Industry Trade," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 75(1), pages 19-27, March.
    17. Qu, Xi & Lee, Lung-fei, 2013. "Locally most powerful tests for spatial interactions in the simultaneous SAR Tobit model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 307-321.
    18. Wang, Liqun, 1998. "Estimation of censored linear errors-in-variables models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 383-400, June.
    19. Caio Waisman & Harikesh S. Nair & Carlos Carrion, 2019. "Online Causal Inference for Advertising in Real-Time Bidding Auctions," Papers 1908.08600, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    20. Reinaldo Arellano-Valle & Luis Castro & Graciela González-Farías & Karla Muñoz-Gajardo, 2012. "Student-t censored regression model: properties and inference," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(4), pages 453-473, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.09771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.