IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2409.18638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multidimensional Skills as a Measure of Human Capital: Evidence from LinkedIn Profiles

Author

Listed:
  • David Dorn
  • Florian Schoner
  • Moritz Seebacher
  • Lisa Simon
  • Ludger Woessmann

Abstract

We measure human capital using the self-reported skill sets of 8.75 million U.S. college graduates from professional profiles on the online platform LinkedIn. We establish that these skills are systematically related to human capital investments such as different types of schooling and work experience. The average profile of the number of reported skills by age looks remarkably similar to the well-established concave age-earnings profiles. More experienced workers and those with higher educational degrees have larger shares of occupation-specific skills, consistent with their acquisition through professional-degree programs and on-the-job experience. Workers who report more, and particularly more specific and managerial, skills are more likely to hold highly paid jobs. Skill differences across workers can account for more earnings variation than detailed vectors of education and experience. We also document a substantial gender gap in reported skills, which starts to manifest when young women reach typical ages of first motherhood. Gender differences in skill profiles can rationalize a substantial proportion of the gender gap in the propensity to work in highly paid jobs. Overall, the results are consistent with an important role of multidimensional skills in accounting for several well-known basic labor-market patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • David Dorn & Florian Schoner & Moritz Seebacher & Lisa Simon & Ludger Woessmann, 2024. "Multidimensional Skills as a Measure of Human Capital: Evidence from LinkedIn Profiles," Papers 2409.18638, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.18638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.18638
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.18638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.