IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2207.09951.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Market Making Under a Hawkes Process-Based Limit Order Book Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Gav{s}perov
  • Zvonko Kostanjv{c}ar

Abstract

The stochastic control problem of optimal market making is among the central problems in quantitative finance. In this paper, a deep reinforcement learning-based controller is trained on a weakly consistent, multivariate Hawkes process-based limit order book simulator to obtain market making controls. The proposed approach leverages the advantages of Monte Carlo backtesting and contributes to the line of research on market making under weakly consistent limit order book models. The ensuing deep reinforcement learning controller is compared to multiple market making benchmarks, with the results indicating its superior performance with respect to various risk-reward metrics, even under significant transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Gav{s}perov & Zvonko Kostanjv{c}ar, 2022. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Market Making Under a Hawkes Process-Based Limit Order Book Model," Papers 2207.09951, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.09951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09951
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Guéant & Iuliia Manziuk, 2019. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Market Making in Corporate Bonds: Beating the Curse of Dimensionality," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 387-452, September.
    2. Olivier Gu'eant & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Joaquin Fernandez Tapia, 2011. "Dealing with the Inventory Risk. A solution to the market making problem," Papers 1105.3115, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2012.
    3. Emmanuel Bacry & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Franc{c}ois Muzy, 2015. "Hawkes processes in finance," Papers 1502.04592, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    4. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2018. "High-dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books: modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 249-264, February.
    5. Rama Cont & Sasha Stoikov & Rishi Talreja, 2010. "A Stochastic Model for Order Book Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 549-563, June.
    6. Biais, Bruno & Hillion, Pierre & Spatt, Chester, 1995. "An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1655-1689, December.
    7. Antonio Briola & Jeremy Turiel & Tomaso Aste, 2020. "Deep Learning modeling of Limit Order Book: a comparative perspective," Papers 2007.07319, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    8. José Da Fonseca & Riadh Zaatour, 2014. "Hawkes Process: Fast Calibration, Application to Trade Clustering, and Diffusive Limit," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 548-579, June.
    9. Bastien Baldacci & Iuliia Manziuk & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2019. "Market making and incentives design in the presence of a dark pool: a deep reinforcement learning approach," Papers 1912.01129, arXiv.org.
    10. Olivier Gu'eant & Iuliia Manziuk, 2019. "Deep reinforcement learning for market making in corporate bonds: beating the curse of dimensionality," Papers 1910.13205, arXiv.org.
    11. John M Coates & Lionel Page, 2009. "A Note on Trader Sharpe Ratios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-5, November.
    12. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2018. "High dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books Modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration," Post-Print hal-01686122, HAL.
    13. Marco Avellaneda & Sasha Stoikov, 2008. "High-frequency trading in a limit order book," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 217-224.
    14. V. Filimonov & D. Sornette, 2015. "Apparent criticality and calibration issues in the Hawkes self-excited point process model: application to high-frequency financial data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(8), pages 1293-1314, August.
    15. Sumitra Ganesh & Nelson Vadori & Mengda Xu & Hua Zheng & Prashant Reddy & Manuela Veloso, 2019. "Reinforcement Learning for Market Making in a Multi-agent Dealer Market," Papers 1911.05892, arXiv.org.
    16. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    17. Thomas Spooner & John Fearnley & Rahul Savani & Andreas Koukorinis, 2018. "Market Making via Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1804.04216, arXiv.org.
    18. Jonathan Sadighian, 2019. "Deep Reinforcement Learning in Cryptocurrency Market Making," Papers 1911.08647, arXiv.org.
    19. Pietro Fodra & Huy^en Pham, 2013. "High frequency trading and asymptotics for small risk aversion in a Markov renewal model," Papers 1310.1756, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Gašperov & Stjepan Begušić & Petra Posedel Šimović & Zvonko Kostanjčar, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning Approaches to Optimal Market Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Pankaj Kumar, 2021. "Deep Hawkes Process for High-Frequency Market Making," Papers 2109.15110, arXiv.org.
    3. Ben Hambly & Renyuan Xu & Huining Yang, 2021. "Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Finance," Papers 2112.04553, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    4. Ben Hambly & Renyuan Xu & Huining Yang, 2023. "Recent advances in reinforcement learning in finance," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 437-503, July.
    5. Bastien Baldacci & Jerome Benveniste & Gordon Ritter, 2020. "Optimal trading without optimal control," Papers 2012.12945, arXiv.org.
    6. Hui Niu & Siyuan Li & Jiahao Zheng & Zhouchi Lin & Jian Li & Jian Guo & Bo An, 2023. "IMM: An Imitative Reinforcement Learning Approach with Predictive Representation Learning for Automatic Market Making," Papers 2308.08918, arXiv.org.
    7. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant, 2022. "Automated Market Makers: Mean-Variance Analysis of LPs Payoffs and Design of Pricing Functions," Papers 2212.00336, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    8. Bastien Baldacci & Iuliia Manziuk, 2020. "Adaptive trading strategies across liquidity pools," Papers 2008.07807, arXiv.org.
    9. Mathieu Rosenbaum & Jianfei Zhang, 2022. "Multi-asset market making under the quadratic rough Heston," Papers 2212.10164, arXiv.org.
    10. Joseph Jerome & Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt & Rahul Savani & Martin Herdegen, 2022. "Model-based gym environments for limit order book trading," Papers 2209.07823, arXiv.org.
    11. Jiafa He & Cong Zheng & Can Yang, 2023. "Integrating Tick-level Data and Periodical Signal for High-frequency Market Making," Papers 2306.17179, arXiv.org.
    12. Baron Law & Frederi Viens, 2019. "Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model," Papers 1903.07222, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    13. Alexander Barzykin & Philippe Bergault & Olivier Gu'eant, 2021. "Algorithmic market making in dealer markets with hedging and market impact," Papers 2106.06974, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    14. Thomas Spooner & Rahul Savani, 2020. "Robust Market Making via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2003.01820, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    15. Philippe Bergault & Olivier Guéant, 2021. "Size matters for OTC market makers: General results and dimensionality reduction techniques," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 279-322, January.
    16. Bastien Baldacci & Joffrey Derchu & Iuliia Manziuk, 2020. "An approximate solution for options market-making in high dimension," Papers 2009.00907, arXiv.org.
    17. Alexander Barzykin & Philippe Bergault & Olivier Guéant, 2023. "Algorithmic market making in dealer markets with hedging and market impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 41-79, January.
    18. Olivier Guéant, 2022. "Computational methods for market making algorithms," Post-Print hal-04590381, HAL.
    19. Shuo Sun & Rundong Wang & Bo An, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading," Papers 2109.13851, arXiv.org.
    20. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Modeling aggressive market order placements with Hawkes factor models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.09951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.