IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/59404.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: 2005 Family Farm Report

Author

Listed:
  • Hoppe, Robert A.
  • Banker, David E.

Abstract

Most farms in the United States—98 percent in 2003—are family farms. They are organized as proprietorships, partnerships, or family corporations. Even the largest farms tend to be family farms, although they are more likely to have more than one operator. Very large family farms and nonfamily farms account for a small share of farms but a large—and growing—share of farm sales. Small family farms account for most of the farms in the United States but produce a modest share of farm output. Median income for farm households is 10 percent greater than the median for all U.S. households, and small-farm households receive substantial off-farm income. Many farm households have a large net worth, reflecting the land-intensive nature of farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoppe, Robert A. & Banker, David E., 2006. "Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: 2005 Family Farm Report," Economic Information Bulletin 59404, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:59404
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.59404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/59404/files/EIB12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.59404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacDonald, James M. & Korb, Penelope J., 2006. "Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2003," Economic Information Bulletin 33903, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Michael Boehlje, 1992. "Alternative models of structural change in agriculture and related industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 219-231.
    3. Allen, Rich & Harris, Ginger, 2005. "What We Know About The Demographics Of U.S. Farm Operators," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2005 32823, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    4. Jones, Carol Adaire & El-Osta, Hisham S. & Green, Robert C., 2006. "Economic Well-Being of Farm Households," Economic Brief 34095, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Gale, Fred, 2002. "The Graying Farm Sector Legacy of Off-Farm Migration," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(3), September.
    6. Lambert, Dayton M. & Sullivan, Patrick & Claassen, Roger & Foreman, Linda F., 2006. "Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates?," Economic Research Report 7255, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Hoppe, Robert A., 1994. "Farming Operations and Households in Farming Areas: A Closer Look," Agricultural Economic Reports 308287, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Hoppe, Robert A., 2001. "Farm Households Are Often Dual-Career," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 16(2), July.
    9. Allen, Rich, 2004. "How To Interpret New Demographic Information In The Preliminary 2002 Census Of Agriculture Release," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2004 33028, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    10. Dimitri, Carolyn & Effland, Anne, . "Milestones in U.S. Farming and Farm Policy," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Howley & Emma Dillon & Thia Hennessy, 2012. "The role of non-pecuniary benefits in the labour allocation decision of farmers," Working Papers 1202, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    2. Harris, James Michael & Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P., 2012. "The Impact Of Farm Succession Decisions On The Financial Performance Of The Farm," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124749, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Michael Stahlman & Laura McCann, 2012. "Technology characteristics, choice architecture, and farmer knowledge: the case of phytase," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(3), pages 371-379, September.
    4. Briggeman, Brian C. & Kenkel, Philip L., 2007. "Farm Credit Employees' Perceptions of Loan Business Relative to Different Types of Borrowers," 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama 34895, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Beach, Robert H. & Jones, Alison Snow & Tooze, Janet A., 2008. "Tobacco Farmer Interest and Success in Income Diversification," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Jesse B. Tack & Rulon D. Pope & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Ricardo H. Cavazos, 2015. "Modelling an aggregate agricultural panel with application to US farm input demands," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 42(3), pages 371-396.
    7. Jesse Tack & Rulon Pope & Jeffrey LaFrance & Ricardo Cavazos, 2012. "Flexible Specification and Robust Estimation of Input Demand Systems," Monash Economics Working Papers 48-12, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    8. Bruce Gardner & Barry Goodwin & Mary Ahearn, 2007. "Economic statistics and U.S. agricultural policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 237-248, December.
    9. Pope, Rulon D. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Just, Richard E., 2011. "Agricultural arbitrage and risk preferences," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 35-43, May.
    10. Peter Howley & Trevor Donnellan & Kevin Hanrahan, 2009. "The 2003 CAP reform: Do decoupled payments affect agricultural production?," Working Papers 0901, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    11. Gedikoglu, Haluk & McCann, Laura M.J., 2009. "Disadoption of Agricultural Practices by Livestock Farmers," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49404, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Hannah Lewis, 2009. "From Mexico to Iowa: New Immigrant Farmers' Pathways and Potentials," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 139-153, June.
    13. White, T. Kirk & Hoppe, Robert A., 2012. "Changing Farm Structure and the Distribution of Farm Payments and Federal Crop Insurance," Economic Information Bulletin 120309, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Eberle, Phillip & Wallace, Russ, 2008. "Recreational Leases as Means to Increase Landowner Income," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2008, pages 1-9.
    15. Forster, D. Lynn, 2006. "An Overview of U.S. Farm Real Estate Markets," Working Papers 28319, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erickson, Kenneth W. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Dubman, Robert W., 2002. "The Structure, Performance, And Sustainability Of Agriculture In The Mountain Region," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36541, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Elanor Starmer & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Living High on the Hog: Factory Farms, Federal Policy, and the Structural Transformation of Swine Production," GDAE Working Papers 07-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    3. Elskamp, Rebecca & Hailu, Getu, 2013. "Do Efficient Dairy Producers Purchase Quota?," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149678, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Andrea E. Woolverton & Michael E. Sykuta, 2009. "Do Income Support Programs Impact Producer Hedging Decisions? Evidence from a Cross-Country Comparative," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 834-852, December.
    5. Katchova, Ani L., 2010. "Agricultural Contracts and Alternative Marketing Options: A Matching Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(2), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Almuhanad Melhim & C. Richard Shumway, 2013. "Cost economies in the presence of marketing contracts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 921-932, March.
    7. Hand, Michael S. & Nickerson, Cynthia J., 2009. "The Role of Cost-Share Rates and Prices on the Size of Conservation Investments in EQIP," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49257, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Bruce Gardner & Barry Goodwin & Mary Ahearn, 2007. "Economic statistics and U.S. agricultural policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 237-248, December.
    9. Boehlje, Michael & Doehring, Todd & Sonka, Steven T., 2005. "Farmers of the Future: Market Segmentation and Buying Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17.
    10. Yu, Xiaohua & Abler, David G. & Peng, Chao, 2008. "Dancing with the Dragon Heads: Enforcement, Innovations and Efficiency of Contracts between Agricultural Processors and Farmers in China," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6144, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Ann Finan, 2011. "For the love of goats: the advantages of alterity," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(1), pages 81-96, February.
    12. Thiermann, Insa & Schröer, Daniel & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2023. "Are German farmers ready for a ‘warm restructuring’ of the pig sector?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Zahniser, Steven & Hoppe, Robert A. & Johnson, James D. & Banker, David E., 2002. "Structural Change In An Era Of Increased Openness: A Background Paper On The Structure Of U.S. Agriculture," Proceedings of the 7th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2001: Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA 16872, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    14. Zimmermann, Andrea & Heckelei, Thomas, 2012. "Differences of farm structural change across European regions," Discussion Papers 162879, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    15. Silke Huettel & Anne Margarian, 2009. "Structural change in the West German agricultural sector," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 759-772, November.
    16. Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "U.S. Agriculture In An Increasingly Competitive Global Market," Staff Papers 28613, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Daniel B Kramer & Kendra Spence Cheruvelil & Patricia A Soranno, 2014. "Using Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses in Socioecological Agent-Based Models to Improve Their Analytical Performance and Policy Relevance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Rakipova, Anna N. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Franke, Donald E., 2003. "Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Louisiana Beef Cattle Production," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2003, pages 1-9.
    19. Kramer, Benedikt & Schorr, Anke & Doluschitz, Reiner & Lips, Markus, 2018. "Wahrscheinlichkeit Von Investitionen In Milchviehställe Schweizer Verkehrsmilchbetriebe," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275845, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Margarian, Anne, 2010. "Coordination and Differentiation of Strategies: The Impact on Farm Growth of Strategic Interaction on the Rental Market for Land," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 59(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:59404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.