IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/esthes/300253.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Analysis and development of customer segmentation criteria and tools for SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Schubert, Sebastian

Abstract

In order to use the limited resources of sales and marketing optimally, and to provide customers with the best services, effective customer segmentation is of prime importance. This thesis deals with methods for analysing and comparing the individual values of customers for SMEs (Small Medium Enterprises), because not all customers bring the same value to the company and not every customer can be treated in the same way. The different segmentation models are judged by different criteria. Which segmentation method allows a company to treat customers in the best possible way based on their value for the company? To answer this question first requires the SME company to determine whether they know the monetary or non-monetary value of their customers. The researcher examined if the size of the company influences the choice of segmentation criteria and method. To determine this, it is necessary to address which companies are SMEs. The main methods are reviewed extensively likewise available software models were evaluated and included in the research, and the advantages and disadvantages are compared. For this research topic, a mixed-method design was chosen. The researcher carried out one-to-one semi-structured expert interviews and, parallel to the qualitative research, quantitative data from a technical retailing company’s database was analysed. The company has data from more than 10,000 customers in the business warehouse and CRM system. The results of this research provide new thoughts to reflect on whether the segmentation methods of the existing literature are useful for SMEs in the B2B business and provide the basis for further research and development in this field. The new segmentation method, identified and confirmed through follow-up interviews in this research, will be of immense value to practitioners. Especially for sales and marketing managers working in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Schubert, Sebastian, 2018. "Analysis and development of customer segmentation criteria and tools for SMEs," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 300253.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:300253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/300253/1/Schubert-Sebastian-Customer-segmentation-criteria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martens, Kerstin & Brüggemann, Michael, 2006. "Kein Experte ist wie der andere: vom Umgang mit Missionaren und Geschichtenerzählern," TranState Working Papers 39, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Álvaro Julio Cuadros & Victoria Eugenia Domínguez, 2014. "Customer segmentation model based on value generation for marketing strategies formulation," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, March.
    3. N. C. G. Campbell & M. T. Cunningham, 1983. "Customer analysis for strategy development in industrial markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 369-380, October.
    4. Nancy Leech & Anthony Onwuegbuzie, 2009. "A typology of mixed methods research designs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 265-275, March.
    5. Gounaris, Spiros & Tzempelikos, Nektarios, 2012. "Conceptualization and measurement of key account management orientation," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 5(3), pages 173-194.
    6. Carson, David & Gilmore, Audrey, 2000. "SME marketing management competencies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 363-382, June.
    7. Dew, Nicholas & Read, Stuart & Sarasvathy, Saras D. & Wiltbank, Robert, 2009. "Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 287-309, July.
    8. McCarty, John A. & Hastak, Manoj, 2007. "Segmentation approaches in data-mining: A comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 656-662, June.
    9. Joanna Sale & Lynne Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil, 2002. "Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 43-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izhak Berkovich, 2018. "Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: the positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2063-2077, September.
    2. Tatiana Khavenson, 2019. "Integration of Schools in Latvia and Estonia Using Curriculum Reforms," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 77-100.
    3. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    4. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Chen, Yanhong & Liu, Luning & Zheng, Dequan & Li, Bin, 2023. "Estimating travellers’ value when purchasing auxiliary services in the airline industry based on the RFM model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Petra C Gronholm & Oluwadamilola Onagbesan & Poonam Gardner-Sood, 2017. "Care coordinator views and experiences of physical health monitoring in clients with severe mental illness: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(7), pages 580-588, November.
    7. I. Albarrán & P. Alonso-González & J. M. Marin, 2017. "Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1289-1308, June.
    8. Fischer, Denise & Greven, Andrea & Tornow, Mark & Brettel, Malte, 2021. "On the value of effectuation processes for R&D alliances and the moderating role of R&D alliance experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 606-619.
    9. Rosalia Diaz‐Carrion & Macarena López‐Fernández & Pedro M. Romero‐Fernandez, 2020. "Sustainable human resource management and employee engagement: A holistic assessment instrument," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1749-1760, July.
    10. Margot Racat & Antonin Ricard & René Mauer, 2024. "Effectuation and causation models: an integrative theoretical framework," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 879-893, March.
    11. Anastasiia Laskovaia & Galina Shirokova & Michael H. Morris, 2017. "National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: global evidence from student entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 687-709, October.
    12. Daniel R Clark & Dan Li & Dean A Shepherd, 2018. "Country familiarity in the initial stage of foreign market selection," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(4), pages 442-472, May.
    13. Stephen Buetow, 2014. "How Can a Family Resemblances Approach Help to Typify Qualitative Research? Exploring the Complexity of Simplicity," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
    14. Bi-Juan Zhong & Yaping Gong & Oded Shenkar & Yadong Luo & Zhixing Xiao & Shuming Zhao, 2023. "Managing the hearts of boundary spanners: CEO organizational identification and international joint venture performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 87-119, March.
    15. Gjoko Stamenkov, 2023. "Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2923-2946, June.
    16. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Scheaf, David J. & Carr, Jon C. & Pollack, Jeffrey M., 2022. "An agentic perspective of resourcefulness: Self-reliant and joint resourcefulness behaviors within the entrepreneurship process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    17. Monika Mynarska & Anna Matysiak, 2010. "Women's determination to combine childbearing and paid employment: How can a qualitative approach help us understand quantitative evidence?," Working Papers 26, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    18. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    19. Muhammad, Nabeel & Léo-Paul, Dana, 2015. "Collective Efficacy of a Regional Network: Extending the Social Embeddedness Perspective of Entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 70120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Antoni Olive-Tomas & Susan S. Harmeling, 2020. "The rise of art movements: an effectual process model of Picasso’s and Braque’s give-and-take during the creation of Cubism (1908–1914)," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 819-842, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:300253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.