IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/empeco/v52y2017i4d10.1007_s00181-016-1107-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view

Author

Listed:
  • I. Albarrán

    (U. Carlos III)

  • P. Alonso-González

    (U. de Alcalá)

  • J. M. Marin

    (U. Carlos III)

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that heterogeneity is one of the characteristics of the insurance market, and it is relevant to classify and characterize companies by means of their financial properties and different risk profiles. So, it may not be adequate to use a general model for all the companies operating in the European market, as the one proposed by the Directive 2009/138/CE. Solvency II is a general regulatory model such that the volume of own resources will be determined depending on risks based on a calibration reached considering the average behaviour of companies. In order to criticize this approach, we have obtained a characterization of the profiles of companies using a PAM clustering methodology, adapted for longitudinal data, and we have studied the evolution of the obtained groups of companies under a Bayesian approach. In this way, we have introduced a multinomial general dynamic linear model to study the probabilities of the companies to be included into each group. The characterization and identification of these groups suggest that an unique regulatory model may be unsuitable. We have used data from DGSFP (Spanish insurance regulator), with public information about the balance sheets and income statements from years 1999 to 2011.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Albarrán & P. Alonso-González & J. M. Marin, 2017. "Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1289-1308, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:52:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-016-1107-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00181-016-1107-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-016-1107-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00181-016-1107-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benston, George J & Smith, Clifford W, Jr, 1976. "A Transactions Cost Approach to the Theory of Financial Intermediation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 31(2), pages 215-231, May.
    2. Hadfield, Jarrod D., 2010. "MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i02).
    3. Brockett, Patrick L. & Cooper, William W. & Golden, Linda L. & Rousseau, John J. & Wang, Yuying, 2004. "Evaluating solvency versus efficiency performance and different forms of organization and marketing in US property--liability insurance companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 492-514, April.
    4. Christophe Genolini & Bruno Falissard, 2010. "KmL: k-means for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 317-328, June.
    5. Van Gestel, Tony & Martens, David & Baesens, Bart & Feremans, Daniel & Huysmans, Johan & Vanthienen, Jan, 2007. "Forecasting and analyzing insurance companies' ratings," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 513-529.
    6. Ioannis Ntzoufras & Petros Dellaportas, 2002. "Bayesian Modelling of Outstanding Liabilities Incorporating Claim Count Uncertainty," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 113-125.
    7. de Haan, Leo & Kakes, Jan, 2010. "Are non-risk based capital requirements for insurance companies binding?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1618-1627, July.
    8. G. V. Kass, 1980. "An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 119-127, June.
    9. Constantin Anghelache & Dan Armeanu, 2008. "Application of Discriminant Analysis on Romanian Insurance Market," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 11(11(528)), pages 51-62, November.
    10. McCarty, John A. & Hastak, Manoj, 2007. "Segmentation approaches in data-mining: A comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 656-662, June.
    11. Dedu, Vasile & Armeanu, Daniel & Enciu, Adrian, 2009. "Using the Multivariate Data Analysis Techniques on the Insurance Market," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 170-179, December.
    12. A. N. Pettitt & T. T. Tran & M. A. Haynes & J. L. Hay, 2006. "A Bayesian hierarchical model for categorical longitudinal data from a social survey of immigrants," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(1), pages 97-114, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alonso, Pablo J., 2011. "Why using a general model in Solvency II is not a good idea : an explanation from a Bayesian point of view," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws113729, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    2. Hache, Emmanuel & Leboullenger, Déborah & Mignon, Valérie, 2017. "Beyond average energy consumption in the French residential housing market: A household classification approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-95.
    3. Legohérel, Patrick & Hsu, Cathy H.C. & Daucé, Bruno, 2015. "Variety-seeking: Using the CHAID segmentation approach in analyzing the international traveler market," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 359-366.
    4. do Valle, Patrícia Oom & Pintassilgo, Pedro & Matias, António & André, Filipe, 2012. "Tourist attitudes towards an accommodation tax earmarked for environmental protection: A survey in the Algarve," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1408-1416.
    5. Celal Hakan Kagnicioglu & Mune Mogol, 2014. "Implementation of Chaid Algorithm: A Hotel Case," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 3(4), pages 42-51, October.
    6. Danijel Bratina & Armand Faganel, 2023. "Using Supervised Machine Learning Methods for RFM Segmentation: A Casino Direct Marketing Communication Case," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 35(1), pages 7-22.
    7. Coussement, Kristof & Van den Bossche, Filip A.M. & De Bock, Koen W., 2014. "Data accuracy's impact on segmentation performance: Benchmarking RFM analysis, logistic regression, and decision trees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2751-2758.
    8. M. Ballings & D. Van Den Poel, 2012. "The Relevant Length of Customer Event History for Churn Prediction: How long is long enough?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/804, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry & Yang, Dujuan, 2018. "Estimating panel effects in probabilistic representations of dynamic decision trees using bayesian generalized linear mixture models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 168-184.
    10. Hayk Manucharyan, 2020. "How do managers actually choose suppliers? Evidence from revealed preference data," Working Papers 2020-12, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Jessica Alzamora-Ruiz & Carlos Guerrero-Medina & Myriam Martínez-Fiestas & Jaime Serida-Nishimura, 2020. "Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption: An Exploratory Study of Motivating Factors in a Latin American Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Augustin, Thomas, 2007. "Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 483-501, September.
    13. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Vu, Phuong Anh & Wong, Bernard, 2020. "A multivariate evolutionary generalised linear model framework with adaptive estimation for claims reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 50-71.
    14. Mohammad Nourani & Qian Long Kweh & Evelyn Shyamala Devadason & V.G.R. Chandran, 2020. "A decomposition analysis of managerial efficiency for the insurance companies: A data envelopment analysis approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 885-901, September.
    15. Philipp Bagus & David Howden, 2016. "The economic and legal significance of “full” deposit availability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 243-254, February.
    16. Patrycja Klusak & Matthew Agarwala & Matt Burke & Moritz Kraemer & Kamiar Mohaddes, 2023. "Rising Temperatures, Falling Ratings: The Effect of Climate Change on Sovereign Creditworthiness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7468-7491, December.
    17. Yousaf Muhammad & Dey Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 219-239, September.
    18. Andrés López-Sepulcre & Sebastiano De Bona & Janne K. Valkonen & Kate D.L. Umbers & Johanna Mappes, 2015. "Item Response Trees: a recommended method for analyzing categorical data in behavioral studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1268-1273.
    19. Jesse Shore & Ethan Bernstein & David Lazer, 2014. "Facts and Figuring: An Experimental Investigation of Network Structure and Performance in Information and Solution Spaces," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-075, Harvard Business School, revised Jun 2014.
    20. Loterman, Gert & Brown, Iain & Martens, David & Mues, Christophe & Baesens, Bart, 2012. "Benchmarking regression algorithms for loss given default modeling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 161-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:52:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-016-1107-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.