IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v56y2009i8p699-713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The assignment of storage locations to containers for a container stack

Author

Listed:
  • Yat‐wah Wan
  • Jiyin Liu
  • Pei‐Chun Tsai

Abstract

Assigning storage locations to incoming or reshuffled containers is a fundamental problem essential to the operations efficiency of container terminals. The problem is notoriously hard for its combinatorial and dynamic nature. In this article, we minimize the number of reshuffles in assigning storage locations for incoming and reshuffled export containers. For the static problem to empty a given stack without any new container arrival, the optimum reshuffle sequence is identified by an integer program (IP). The integer program captures the evolution of stack configurations as a function of decisions and is of interest by itself. Heuristics based on the integer program are then derived. Their competitiveness in accuracy and time are established by extensive numerical runs comparing them with existing heuristics in literature and in practice as well as with extensions of the existing heuristics. Variants of the IP‐based heuristics are then applied to the dynamic problem with continual retrievals and arrivals of containers. Again, numerical runs confirm that the IP‐based heuristic is competitive. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Yat‐wah Wan & Jiyin Liu & Pei‐Chun Tsai, 2009. "The assignment of storage locations to containers for a container stack," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(8), pages 699-713, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:8:p:699-713
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20373
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chuqian & Liu, Jiyin & Wan, Yat-wah & Murty, Katta G. & Linn, Richard J., 2003. "Storage space allocation in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 883-903, December.
    2. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young Man & Ryu, Kwang-Ryul, 2000. "Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 89-101, July.
    3. Taleb-Ibrahimi, Mounira & de Castilho, Bernardo & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1993. "Storage space vs handling work in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 13-32, February.
    4. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Bo & Tanaka, Shunji, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the unrestricted container relocation problem with new lower bounds and dominance rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 494-514.
    2. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2020. "The stochastic container relocation problem with flexible service policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-163.
    3. Buddhi A. Weerasinghe & H. Niles Perera & Xiwen Bai, 2024. "Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 307-341, June.
    4. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    5. Bacci, Tiziano & Mattia, Sara & Ventura, Paolo, 2020. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the restricted Block Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 452-459.
    6. Raka Jovanovic & Shunji Tanaka & Tatsushi Nishi & Stefan Voß, 2019. "A GRASP approach for solving the Blocks Relocation Problem with Stowage Plan," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 702-729, September.
    7. M. Hakan Akyüz & Chung‐Yee Lee, 2014. "A mathematical formulation and efficient heuristics for the dynamic container relocation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 101-118, March.
    8. Marolt Jakob & Lerher Tone, 2018. "Comparison of Lowest-Slot and Nearest-Stack Heuristics for Storage Assignment of Steel Bar Sets," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 37-45, October.
    9. Jovanovic, Raka & Tuba, Milan & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "An efficient ant colony optimization algorithm for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 78-90.
    10. Boschma, René & Mes, Martijn R.K. & de Vries, Leon R., 2023. "Approximate dynamic programming for container stacking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 328-342.
    11. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Xie, Ying, 2022. "Service fairness and value of customer information for the stochastic container relocation problem under flexible service policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Sun, Defeng & Meng, Ying & Tang, Lixin & Liu, Jinyin & Huang, Baobin & Yang, Jiefu, 2020. "Storage space allocation problem at inland bulk material stockyard," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Tanaka, Shunji & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "An exact algorithm for the block relocation problem with a stowage plan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 767-781.
    14. Tanaka, Shunji & Voß, Stefan, 2022. "An exact approach to the restricted block relocation problem based on a new integer programming formulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 485-503.
    15. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "Yard Crane Scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 288-316.
    16. Huiling Zhu & Mingjun Ji & Wenwen Guo & Qingbin Wang & Yongzhi Yang, 2019. "Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm for the block relocation and loading problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 333-351, June.
    17. Lixin Tang & Ren Zhao & Jiyin Liu, 2012. "Models and algorithms for shuffling problems in steel plants," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(7), pages 502-524, October.
    18. Andresson Silva Firmino & Ricardo Martins Abreu Silva & Valéria Cesário Times, 2019. "A reactive GRASP metaheuristic for the container retrieval problem to reduce crane’s working time," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 141-173, April.
    19. Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang & Kai Wang, 2016. "Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 529-548, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    2. Briskorn, Dirk & Drexl, Andreas & Hartmann, Sönke, 2005. "Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 596, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    3. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Zhen, Lu & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Kai & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Multi-period yard template planning in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 700-719.
    5. Chen, Lu & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2012. "The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 73-80.
    6. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    7. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    8. Hyun Ji Park & Sung Won Cho & Abhilasha Nanda & Jin Hyoung Park, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic stacking strategy for export containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 170-195, March.
    9. Zhen, Lu, 2014. "Container yard template planning under uncertain maritime market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 199-217.
    10. Bortfeldt, Andreas & Forster, Florian, 2012. "A tree search procedure for the container pre-marshalling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 531-540.
    11. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    12. Yingyi Huang & Yuliya Mamatok & Chun Jin, 2021. "Decision-making instruments for container seaport sustainable development: management platform and system dynamics model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 212-226, June.
    13. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    14. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Kang Tae, 2003. "A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 92-101, July.
    15. Zhongbin Zhao & Xifu Wang & Suxin Cheng & Wei Liu & Lijun Jiang, 2022. "A New Synchronous Handling Technology of Double Stack Container Trains in Sea-Rail Intermodal Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Voß, Andre & Guckenbiehl, Gabriel & Schütt, Holger & Buer, Tobias, 2016. "A storage strategy with dynamic bay reservations for container terminals," Bremen Computational Logistics Group Working Papers 4, University of Bremen, Computational Logistics Junior Research Group.
    17. Zhang, Canrong & Wu, Tao & Kim, Kap Hwan & Miao, Lixin, 2014. "Conservative allocation models for outbound containers in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 155-165.
    18. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    19. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    20. Jonas Ahmt & Jonas Skott Sigtenbjerggaard & Richard Martin Lusby & Jesper Larsen & David Ryan, 2016. "A new approach to the Container Positioning Problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 617-643, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:8:p:699-713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.