IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v238y2014i1p155-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservative allocation models for outbound containers in container terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Canrong
  • Wu, Tao
  • Kim, Kap Hwan
  • Miao, Lixin

Abstract

This paper examines location assignment for outbound containers in container terminals. It is an extension to the previous modeling work of Kim et al. (2000) and Zhang et al. (2010). The previous model was an “optimistic” handling way and gave a moderate punishment for placing a lighter container onto the top of a stack already loaded with heavier containers. Considering that the original model neglected the stack height and the state-changing magnitude information when interpreting the punishment parameter and hid too much information about the specific configurations for a given stack representation, we propose two new “conservative” allocation models in this paper. One considers the stack height and the state-changing magnitude information by reinterpreting the punishment parameter and the other further considers the specific configurations for a given stack representation. Solution qualities for the “optimistic” and the two “conservative” allocation models are compared on two performance indicators. The numerical experiments indicate that both the first and second “conservative” allocation models outperform the original model in terms of the two performance indicators. In addition, to overcome computational difficulties encountered by the dynamic programming algorithm for large-scale problems, an approximate dynamic programming algorithm is presented as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Canrong & Wu, Tao & Kim, Kap Hwan & Miao, Lixin, 2014. "Conservative allocation models for outbound containers in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 155-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:238:y:2014:i:1:p:155-165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714002793
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young Man & Ryu, Kwang-Ryul, 2000. "Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 89-101, July.
    2. Canrong Zhang & Zhihai Zhang & Li Zheng & Lixin Miao, 2011. "A Decision Support System For The Allocation Of Yard Cranes And Blocks In Container Terminals," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(06), pages 803-829.
    3. Chen, Lu & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2012. "The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 73-80.
    4. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    5. Zhang, Canrong & Chen, Weiwei & Shi, Leyuan & Zheng, Li, 2010. "A note on deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 483-485, September.
    6. Lee, Yusin & Chao, Shih-Liang, 2009. "A neighborhood search heuristic for pre-marshalling export containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 468-475, July.
    7. Jang, Dong-Won & Kim, Se Won & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2013. "The optimization of mixed block stacking requiring relocations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 256-262.
    8. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Kang Tae, 2003. "A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 92-101, July.
    9. Zhang, Chuqian & Liu, Jiyin & Wan, Yat-wah & Murty, Katta G. & Linn, Richard J., 2003. "Storage space allocation in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 883-903, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    2. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    4. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    7. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    8. Boschma, René & Mes, Martijn R.K. & de Vries, Leon R., 2023. "Approximate dynamic programming for container stacking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 328-342.
    9. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    10. Zhang, Canrong & Guan, Hao & Yuan, Yifei & Chen, Weiwei & Wu, Tao, 2020. "Machine learning-driven algorithms for the container relocation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 102-131.
    11. Zhang, Canrong & Wang, Qi & Yuan, Guoping, 2023. "Novel models and algorithms for location assignment for outbound containers in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 722-737.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    2. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    3. Chen, Xiaojing & Li, Feng & Jia, Bin & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Optimizing storage location assignment in an automotive Ro-Ro terminal," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 249-281.
    4. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    7. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    8. Yu, Mingzhu & Qi, Xiangtong, 2013. "Storage space allocation models for inbound containers in an automatic container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 32-45.
    9. Zhang, Canrong & Guan, Hao & Yuan, Yifei & Chen, Weiwei & Wu, Tao, 2020. "Machine learning-driven algorithms for the container relocation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 102-131.
    10. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    11. Hyun Ji Park & Sung Won Cho & Abhilasha Nanda & Jin Hyoung Park, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic stacking strategy for export containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 170-195, March.
    12. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    13. Voß, Andre & Guckenbiehl, Gabriel & Schütt, Holger & Buer, Tobias, 2016. "A storage strategy with dynamic bay reservations for container terminals," Bremen Computational Logistics Group Working Papers 4, University of Bremen, Computational Logistics Junior Research Group.
    14. Jonas Ahmt & Jonas Skott Sigtenbjerggaard & Richard Martin Lusby & Jesper Larsen & David Ryan, 2016. "A new approach to the Container Positioning Problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 617-643, December.
    15. Juan P. Cavada & Cristián E. Cortés & Pablo A. Rey, 2023. "Comparing allocation and relocation policies at a logistics service container terminal: a discrete-event simulation approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1281-1316, December.
    16. David Boywitz & Nils Boysen & Dirk Briskorn, 2016. "Resequencing with parallel queues to minimize the maximum number of items in the overflow area," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(5), pages 401-415, August.
    17. Zhen, Lu & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Kai & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Multi-period yard template planning in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 700-719.
    18. Huiling Zhu & Mingjun Ji & Wenwen Guo & Qingbin Wang & Yongzhi Yang, 2019. "Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm for the block relocation and loading problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 333-351, June.
    19. Jin, Bo & Zhu, Wenbin & Lim, Andrew, 2015. "Solving the container relocation problem by an improved greedy look-ahead heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 837-847.
    20. Chen, Lu & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2012. "The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 73-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:238:y:2014:i:1:p:155-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.