IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cauman/596.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Briskorn, Dirk
  • Drexl, Andreas
  • Hartmann, Sönke

Abstract

This paper deals with automated guided vehicles (AGVs) which transport containers between the quai and the stack on automated container terminals. The focus is on the assigment of transportation jobs to AGVs within a terminal control system operating in real time. First, we describe a rather common problem formulation based on due dates for the jobs and solve this problem both with a greedy priority rule based heuristic and with an exact algorithm. Subsequently, we present an alternative formulation of the assignment problem which does not include due dates. This formulation is based on a rough analogy to inventory management and is solved using an exact algorithm. The idea behind this alternative formulation is to avoid estimates of driving times, completion times, due dates and tardiness because such estimates are often highly unreliable in practice and do not allow for accurate planning. By means of simulation, we then analyze the different approaches. We show that the inventory based model leads to better productivity on the terminal than the due date based formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Briskorn, Dirk & Drexl, Andreas & Hartmann, Sönke, 2005. "Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 596, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/147654/1/manuskript_596.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Castilho, Bernardo & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1993. "Handling Strategies for Import Containers at Marine Terminals," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5gr4622f, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1989. "The crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 159-175, June.
    3. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young Man & Ryu, Kwang-Ryul, 2000. "Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 89-101, July.
    4. Meersmans, P.J.M. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2001. "Effective algorithms for integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-36-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    6. Taleb-Ibrahimi, Mounira & de Castilho, Bernardo & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1993. "Storage space vs handling work in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 13-32, February.
    7. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 401-417, May.
    8. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Meersmans, P.J.M. & Dekker, R., 2001. "Operations research supports container handling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2001-22, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    10. de Castillo, Bernardo & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1993. "Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 151-166, April.
    11. Hwan Kim, Kap & Bae Kim, Hong, 1999. "Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 415-423, March.
    12. Young Kim, Ki & Hwan Kim, Kap, 1999. "A routing algorithm for a single straddle carrier to load export containers onto a containership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 425-433, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann, Sönke, 2002. "Generating scenarios for simulation and optimization of container terminal logistics," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 564, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Ebru K. Bish & Thin‐Yin Leong & Chung‐Lun Li & Jonathan W. C. Ng & David Simchi‐Levi, 2001. "Analysis of a new vehicle scheduling and location problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 363-385, August.
    4. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    5. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Kang Tae, 2003. "A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 92-101, July.
    6. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Zhang, Chuqian & Wan, Yat-wah & Liu, Jiyin & Linn, Richard J., 2002. "Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 537-555, July.
    8. Anne V. Goodchild & Carlos F. Daganzo, 2006. "Double-Cycling Strategies for Container Ships and Their Effect on Ship Loading and Unloading Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 473-483, November.
    9. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    10. Zhang, Chuqian & Liu, Jiyin & Wan, Yat-wah & Murty, Katta G. & Linn, Richard J., 2003. "Storage space allocation in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 883-903, December.
    11. Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Gilbert Laporte & Yugang Yu & René de Koster, 2015. "Scheduling Twin Yard Cranes in a Container Block," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 686-705, August.
    12. Hartmann, Sönke, 2002. "A general framework for scheduling equipment and manpower on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 566, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    14. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte & Pasquale Legato & Luigi Moccia, 2005. "Models and Tabu Search Heuristics for the Berth-Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 526-538, November.
    15. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    16. Hyun Ji Park & Sung Won Cho & Abhilasha Nanda & Jin Hyoung Park, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic stacking strategy for export containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 170-195, March.
    17. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    18. Imai, Akio & Sasaki, Kazuya & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2006. "Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 373-389, June.
    19. Voß, Andre & Guckenbiehl, Gabriel & Schütt, Holger & Buer, Tobias, 2016. "A storage strategy with dynamic bay reservations for container terminals," Bremen Computational Logistics Group Working Papers 4, University of Bremen, Computational Logistics Junior Research Group.
    20. Jiyin Liu & Yat‐wah Wan & Lei Wang, 2006. "Quay crane scheduling at container terminals to minimize the maximum relative tardiness of vessel departures," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 60-74, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.