IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v63y2016i7p529-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Zhen
  • Shuaian Wang
  • Kai Wang

Abstract

This article investigates the method of allocating arriving vessels to the terminals in transshipment hubs. The terminal allocation decision faced by a shipping alliance has the influence on the scheduled arrival time of vessels and further affects the bunker consumption cost for the vessels. A model is formulated to minimize the bunker consumption cost as well as the transportation cost of inter‐terminal transshipment flows/movements. The capacity limitation of the port resources such as quay cranes (QCs) and berths is taken into account. Besides the terminal allocation, the QC assignment decision is also incorporated in the proposed model. A local branching based method and a particle swarm optimization based method are developed to solve the model in large‐scale problem instances. Numerical experiments are also conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed model, which can save around 14% of the cost when compared with the “First Come First Served” decision rule. Moreover, the proposed solution methods not only solve the proposed model within a reasonable computation time, but also obtain near‐optimal results with about 0.1∼0.7% relative gap. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 63: 529–548, 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang & Kai Wang, 2016. "Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 529-548, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:63:y:2016:i:7:p:529-548
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21717
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiyin Liu & Yat‐wah Wan & Lei Wang, 2006. "Quay crane scheduling at container terminals to minimize the maximum relative tardiness of vessel departures," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 60-74, February.
    2. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte & Pasquale Legato & Luigi Moccia, 2005. "Models and Tabu Search Heuristics for the Berth-Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 526-538, November.
    3. Meisel, Frank & Bierwirth, Christian, 2009. "Heuristics for the integration of crane productivity in the berth allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 196-209, January.
    4. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    5. Yat‐wah Wan & Jiyin Liu & Pei‐Chun Tsai, 2009. "The assignment of storage locations to containers for a container stack," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(8), pages 699-713, December.
    6. Du, Yuquan & Chen, Qiushuang & Quan, Xiongwen & Long, Lei & Fung, Richard Y.K., 2011. "Berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1021-1037.
    7. Cordeau, Jean-Francois & Gaudioso, Manlio & Laporte, Gilbert & Moccia, Luigi, 2007. "The service allocation problem at the Gioia Tauro Maritime Terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1167-1184, January.
    8. Imai, Akio & Chen, Hsieh Chia & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2008. "The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 900-920, September.
    9. Chen, Gang & Govindan, Kannan & Golias, Mihalis M., 2013. "Reducing truck emissions at container terminals in a low carbon economy: Proposal of a queueing-based bi-objective model for optimizing truck arrival pattern," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 3-22.
    10. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    11. Lee, Der-Horng & Jin, Jian Gang & Chen, Jiang Hang, 2012. "Terminal and yard allocation problem for a container transshipment hub with multiple terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 516-528.
    12. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    13. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 401-417, May.
    14. Luigi Moccia & Jean‐François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "A branch‐and‐cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 45-59, February.
    15. Yuquan Du & Qiushuang Chen & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Ya Xu & Jin Xin Cao, 2015. "Modeling the Impacts of Tides and the Virtual Arrival Policy in Berth Allocation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 939-956, November.
    16. Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Jiao & Liu, Jiyin, 2014. "Modeling and solution of the joint quay crane and truck scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 978-990.
    17. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    18. Giallombardo, Giovanni & Moccia, Luigi & Salani, Matteo & Vacca, Ilaria, 2010. "Modeling and solving the Tactical Berth Allocation Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 232-245, February.
    19. Zhen, Lu, 2015. "Tactical berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 928-944.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. L. Ma & S. H. Chung & H. K. Chan & Li Cui, 2019. "An integrated model for berth and yard planning in container terminals with multi-continuous berth layout," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 409-431, February.
    2. Xu Zhao & Qianjun Lin & Hao Yu, 2019. "An Improved Mathematical Model for Green Lock Scheduling Problem of the Three Gorges Dam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Weiwei Cui & Lin Li & Zhiqiang Lu, 2019. "Energy‐efficient scheduling for sustainable manufacturing systems with renewable energy resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(2), pages 154-173, March.
    4. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2017. "Two decision models for berth allocation problem under uncertainty considering service level," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 312-344, December.
    5. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Wencheng & Lin, Shumin, 2022. "Analytical comparison on two incentive policies for shore power equipped ships in berthing activities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Wang, Tingsong & Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 18-36.
    7. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    8. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Jian & Gao, Ziyou & Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2024. "Integrated planning of berth allocation, quay crane assignment and yard assignment in multiple cooperative terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    2. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    3. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    4. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    6. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    7. Zhen, Lu, 2015. "Tactical berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 928-944.
    8. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    9. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    10. Yi Ding & Shuai Jia & Tianyi Gu & Chung-Lun Li, 2016. "SGICT Builds an Optimization-Based System for Daily Berth Planning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 281-296, August.
    11. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An expanded robust optimisation approach for the berth allocation problem considering uncertain operation time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Fanrui Xie & Tao Wu & Canrong Zhang, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1427-1454, September.
    13. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    14. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2020. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 425-452, June.
    15. Sung Won Cho & Hyun Ji Park & Chulung Lee, 2021. "An integrated method for berth allocation and quay crane assignment to allow for reassignment of vessels to other terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 123-153, March.
    16. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun & Miao, Lixin, 2017. "A bi-objective robust model for berth allocation scheduling under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 294-319.
    17. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Haoming & Du, Jian & Zhu, Zhihong, 2022. "The berth assignment and allocation problem considering cooperative liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Shang, Xiao Ting & Cao, Jin Xin & Ren, Jie, 2016. "A robust optimization approach to the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 44-65.
    20. Wang, Tingsong & Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 18-36.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:63:y:2016:i:7:p:529-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.