IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p545-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The self‐assessment of clinical competence and the need for further training: A cross‐sectional survey of advanced practice nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Ingrid Taylor
  • Pia Bing‐Jonsson
  • Sigrid Wangensteen
  • Elisabeth Finnbakk
  • Leiv Sandvik
  • Brendan McCormack
  • Lisbeth Fagerström

Abstract

Aims and objectives (a) To describe and analyse advanced practice nursing students' self‐assessment of their clinical competence and need for further training and (b) to analyse the possible predictive variables in their self‐assessment. Background The self‐assessment of clinical competence in nursing education is important for identifying professional development and educational needs to improve patient care. Design A cross‐sectional survey following STROBE guidelines was used. Methods Ninety‐nine students from three universities/university colleges in Norway participated in the study, and data were collected using a revised version of the Professional Nurse Self‐Assessment Scale II. Descriptive, correlation and regression analyses were performed. Results The students gave the highest self‐assessment ratings for their clinical competence in taking full responsibility and for their need for further training in medication effects and interactions. Although the students gave themselves low ratings for the use of electronic devices, they assessed their need for further training in this area as average. Clinical work experience as a registered nurse and previous higher education level were not significant predictors of clinical competence nor the need for further training. Conclusion The findings indicate that self‐assessment is appropriate for students in advanced practice nursing programmes. This study implies that programmes in advanced practice nursing need to familiarise students with the possibilities of information technology. It questions the entry requirement that stipulates that prospective students must have several years of clinical work experience as registered nurses before entering advanced practice nursing programmes. These programmes need to communicate that competencies other than direct clinical practice are also needed for students' future roles. Relevance to clinical practice The study contributes to the exploration of how students self‐assess own clinical competence and need for further training in advanced practice nursing programmes. Further research should evaluate the development of clinical competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingrid Taylor & Pia Bing‐Jonsson & Sigrid Wangensteen & Elisabeth Finnbakk & Leiv Sandvik & Brendan McCormack & Lisbeth Fagerström, 2020. "The self‐assessment of clinical competence and the need for further training: A cross‐sectional survey of advanced practice nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 545-555, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:545-555
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Christensen & Jaqui Hewitt‐Taylor, 2006. "From expert to tasks, expert nursing practice redefined?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(12), pages 1531-1539, December.
    2. Gerard M Fealy & Mary Casey & Denise F O'Leary & Martin S McNamara & Denise O'Brien & Laserina O'Connor & Rita Smith & Diarmuid Stokes, 2018. "Developing and sustaining specialist and advanced practice roles in nursing and midwifery: A discourse on enablers and barriers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3797-3809, October.
    3. Schlösser, Thomas & Dunning, David & Johnson, Kerri L. & Kruger, Justin, 2013. "How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-100.
    4. Monika Ravik & Anton Havnes & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2017. "Conditions Affecting the Performance of Peripheral Vein Cannulation during Hospital Placement: A Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, November.
    5. Claudia B. Maier & Linda H. Aiken & Reinhard Busse, 2017. "Nurses in advanced roles in primary care: Policy levers for implementation," OECD Health Working Papers 98, OECD Publishing.
    6. Elín Jakobína Oddsdóttir & Herdís Sveinsdóttir, 2011. "The content of the work of clinical nurse specialists described by use of daily activity diaries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1393-1404, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Heslop & Kylie Bailey & Jonathan Paul & Elizabeth Stojanovski, 2018. "The PILAR Model as a Measure of Peer Ratings of Collaboration Viability in Small Groups," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    3. Peter J. Baldacchino & Chantelle Camilleri & Simon Grima & Frank H. Bezzina, 2017. "Assessing Incentive and Monitoring Schemes in the Corporate Governance of Maltese Co-operatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 177-195.
    4. Brookins, Philip & Lucas, Adriana & Ryvkin, Dmitry, 2014. "Reducing within-group overconfidence through group identity and between-group confidence judgments," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Kotherová Zuzana & Caithamlová Martina & Nemec Miroslav, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Involvement of Nurses in Preventive Care and Health Literacy in the Czech Republic," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 33-50, December.
    6. Grabiszewski, Konrad & Horenstein, Alex, 2020. "Effort is not a monotonic function of skills: Results from a global mobile experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 634-652.
    7. Burau, Viola & Mejsner, Sofie Buch & Falkenbach, Michelle & Fehsenfeld, Michael & Kotherová, Zuzana & Neri, Stefano & Wallenburg, Iris & Kuhlmann, Ellen, 2024. "Post-COVID health policy responses to healthcare workforce capacities: A comparative analysis of health system resilience in six European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Torunn Kitty Vatnøy & Tor‐Ivar Karlsen & Bjørg Dale, 2019. "Exploring nursing competence to care for older patients in municipal in‐patient acute care: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3339-3352, September.
    9. Randi Skår, 2010. "The meaning of autonomy in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2226-2234, August.
    10. Kinga Harpula & Anna Bartosiewicz, 2022. "Factors Influencing Nurses’ Opinions on the Implementation of Nursing Advice in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-9, June.
    11. Kawamura, Tetsuya & Mori, Tomoharu & Motonishi, Taizo & Ogawa, Kazuhito, 2021. "Is Financial Literacy Dangerous? Financial Literacy, Behavioral Factors, and Financial Choices of Households," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Dunkel, Curtis S. & Nedelec, Joseph & van der Linden, Dimitri, 2023. "Reevaluating the Dunning-Kruger effect: A response to and replication of Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Bruce Hewitson & Katinka Waagsaether & Jan Wohland & Kate Kloppers & Teizeen Kara, 2017. "Climate information websites: an evolving landscape," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    14. Marlene Carvalho & Filomena Gaspar & Teresa Potra & Pedro Lucas, 2022. "Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Clinical Nurse Leaders for the Portuguese Culture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Köppen, Julia & Maier, Claudia B. & Busse, Reinhard, 2018. "What are the motivating and hindering factors for health professionals to undertake new roles in hospitals? A study among physicians, nurses and managers looking at breast cancer and acute myocardial ," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1118-1125.
    16. Silje Havrevold Henni & Marit Kirkevold & Konstantinos Antypas & Christina Foss, 2019. "The integration of new nurse practitioners into care of older adults: A survey study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2911-2923, August.
    17. Kuhlmann, Ellen & Groenewegen, Peter P. & Bond, Christine & Burau, Viola & Hunter, David J., 2018. "Primary care workforce development in Europe: An overview of health system responses and stakeholder views," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1055-1062.
    18. Julia van Kraaij & Catharina van Oostveen & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen & Anita Huis & Marian Adriaansen & Jeroen Peters, 2020. "Nurse practitioners’ perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 447-458, February.
    19. Dorota Kilańska & Anna Lipert & Marika Guzek & Per Engelseth & Michał Marczak & Kamila Sienkiewicz & Remigiusz Kozłowski, 2021. "Increased Accessibility to Primary Healthcare Due to Nurse Prescribing of Medicines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Jan R. Magnus & Anatoly A. Peresetsky, 2021. "A statistical explanation of the Dunning-Kruger effect," Working Papers w0286, New Economic School (NES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:545-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.