IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1393-1404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The content of the work of clinical nurse specialists described by use of daily activity diaries

Author

Listed:
  • Elín Jakobína Oddsdóttir
  • Herdís Sveinsdóttir

Abstract

Aim. Evaluate the usefulness of the role of clinical nurse specialists and the content of their work by mapping their activities. Background. The clinical work of advanced practice nursing differs in different countries, and a clear picture is lacking on what exactly advanced practice nurses do. Design. Prospective exploratory study. Method. The setting of the study was the largest hospital in Iceland where over half of the country’s active nursing workforce are employed, including the only clinical nurse specialists. Of 19 clinical nurse specialists working at the hospital, 15 participated. Data were collected over seven days with a structured activity diary that lists 65 activities, classified into six roles and three domains. In 17 instances, the ‘role activities’ and ‘domain activities’ overlap and form 17 categories of practice. The clinical nurse specialists coded their activities at 15‐minutes interval and could code up to four activities simultaneously. Daily, the clinical nurse specialists evaluated their clinical nurse specialist background. Results. The roles that occupied the greatest proportion of the clinical nurse specialists’ time were education, expert practice and ‘other’ activities, while the smallest proportions were in counselling, research and practice development. The domain they worked in most was the institutional domain, followed by the client/family domain and the clinical outcome management domain. All of the clinical nurse specialists reported working on two activities simultaneously, 11 of them on three activities and six on four activities. They self‐assessed their background as clinical nurse specialists as being very useful. Conclusion. The activity diary is a useful tool for assessing the content of practice. Clinical nurse specialists spend too much time on activities related to the institution. Nurse managers are advised to provide clinical nurse specialists with ample time to develop the direct practice role in the client/family domain. Relevance to clinical practice. The development of advanced nursing practice requires that clinical nurse specialists take an active and visible part in direct patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Elín Jakobína Oddsdóttir & Herdís Sveinsdóttir, 2011. "The content of the work of clinical nurse specialists described by use of daily activity diaries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1393-1404, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1393-1404
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03652.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03652.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03652.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Taylor & Pia Bing‐Jonsson & Sigrid Wangensteen & Elisabeth Finnbakk & Leiv Sandvik & Brendan McCormack & Lisbeth Fagerström, 2020. "The self‐assessment of clinical competence and the need for further training: A cross‐sectional survey of advanced practice nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 545-555, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1393-1404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.