IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i12p1531-1539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From expert to tasks, expert nursing practice redefined?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Christensen
  • Jaqui Hewitt‐Taylor

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper was to explore the concept of expertise in nursing from the perspective of how it relates to current driving forces in health care in which it discusses the potential barriers to acceptance of nursing expertise in a climate in which quantification of value and cost containment run high on agendas. Background. Expert nursing practice can be argued to be central to high quality, holistic, individualized patient care. However, changes in government policy which have led to the inception of comprehensive guidelines or protocols of care are in danger of relegating the ‘expert nurse’ to being an icon of the past. Indeed, it could be argued that expert nurses are an expensive commodity within the nursing workforce. Consequently, with this change to the use of clinical guidelines, it calls into question how expert nursing practice will develop within this framework of care. Method. The article critically reviews the evidence related to the role of the Expert Nurse in an attempt to identify the key concepts and ideas, and how the inception of care protocols has implications for their role. Conclusion. Nursing expertise which focuses on the provision of individualized, holistic care and is based largely on intuitive decision making cannot, should not be reduced to being articulated in positivist terms. However, the dominant power and decision‐making focus in health care means that nurses must be confident in articulating the value of a concept which may be outside the scope of knowledge of those with whom they are debating. Relevance to clinical practice. The principles of abduction or fuzzy logic may be useful in assisting nurses to explain in terms which others can comprehend, the value of nursing expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Christensen & Jaqui Hewitt‐Taylor, 2006. "From expert to tasks, expert nursing practice redefined?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(12), pages 1531-1539, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:12:p:1531-1539
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01601.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01601.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01601.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Taylor & Pia Bing‐Jonsson & Sigrid Wangensteen & Elisabeth Finnbakk & Leiv Sandvik & Brendan McCormack & Lisbeth Fagerström, 2020. "The self‐assessment of clinical competence and the need for further training: A cross‐sectional survey of advanced practice nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 545-555, February.
    2. Randi Skår, 2010. "The meaning of autonomy in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2226-2234, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:12:p:1531-1539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.