IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v194y2024ics030142152400363x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical field evaluation of self-consumption promoting regulation of household battery energy storage systems

Author

Listed:
  • Semmelmann, Leo
  • Konermann, Marie
  • Dietze, Daniel
  • Staudt, Philipp

Abstract

An increasing number of battery energy storage systems are installed in households globally. These systems are influenced by distinct regulatory frameworks. Internationally, a consolidated regulatory framework for household battery energy storage has yet to emerge. The widely proliferated self-consumption regulation promotes the utilization of battery storage systems to maximize the consumption of self-generated electricity from PV panels. Yet, a large-scale empirical field study evaluating the effect of such regulation is missing. To this end, we present an empirical evaluation of a unique dataset describing the operation of 947 household battery energy storage systems over one year, propose alternative regulatory regimes that we evaluate based on a simulation with the same battery profiles and a survey with 196 respondents evaluating household attitudes towards their battery storage. The results show that the self-consumption promoting regulation leads to almost no additional welfare for the system and even adds costs in some cases that are being socialized among energy consumers. Furthermore, minimal adjustments in the regulation might considerably increase the value of battery storage for households and the system and we find that trust in the supplier might suffice to have households adopt alternative battery storage profiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Semmelmann, Leo & Konermann, Marie & Dietze, Daniel & Staudt, Philipp, 2024. "Empirical field evaluation of self-consumption promoting regulation of household battery energy storage systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:194:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400363x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400363X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:194:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400363x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.