IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i17-18p3382-3391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Elias David Lundereng
  • Alfhild Dihle
  • Simen A. Steindal

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nurses’ experiences and perspectives on discharge collaboration when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals. Background Patients receiving palliative care for cancer experience multiple transitions between the hospital and their home. Poor discharge collaboration is a major cause of preventable hospital readmissions. Collaborative discharge planning could improve the care for these patients outside the hospital setting. Previous research has mostly been conducted in noncancer populations. Further research regarding both home care nurses’ and hospital nurses’ perspectives on care transitions is required. Design A qualitative study with descriptive and explorative design. Methods Data were collected through 10 individual, semi‐structured interviews of nurses working at two oncology wards at a university hospital and home care services in four municipalities within the hospital's catchment area. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation. COREQ guidelines were adhered to in the reporting of this study. Results Three categories emerged from the data analysis: lack of familiarity and different perceptions lead to distrust; inefficient communication creates a need for informal collaboration; and delayed discharge planning challenges collaboration. Conclusions The nurses lacked an understanding of each other's work situation, which created distrust, misunderstandings and misconceptions regarding each other's abilities to care for the patient. This led to inefficient communication, relying on individual knowledge, informal communication and personal networking. Delays in the discharge planning resulted in poorly prepared discharges often lacking necessary equipment and documentation. Relevance to clinical practice To improve the care of patients receiving palliative care for cancer outside the hospital setting, better communication is a key factor to promote confidence and understanding between nurses working in different settings of health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3382-3391
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15371
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yung Ying Tan & Jeanine Blackford, 2015. "‘Rapid discharge’: issues for hospital‐based nurses in discharging cancer patients home to die," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2601-2610, September.
    2. Rose M Olsen & Bjørg H Østnor & Ingela Enmarker & Ove Hellzén, 2013. "Barriers to information exchange during older patients' transfer: nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2964-2973, October.
    3. Merete Lyngstad & Anders Grimsmo & Dag Hofoss & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2014. "Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3424-3433, December.
    4. Paul T E Cusack, 2020. "On Pain," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(3), pages 24253-24254, October.
    5. Jane M Nosbusch & Marianne E Weiss & Kathleen L Bobay, 2011. "An integrated review of the literature on challenges confronting the acute care staff nurse in discharge planning," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 754-774, March.
    6. Helle Vendel Petersen & Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm, 2019. "“It is two worlds” cross‐sectoral nurse collaboration related to care transitions: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1999-2008, May.
    7. Line Melby & Berit J Brattheim & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2015. "Patients in transition – improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3389-3399, December.
    8. Fien Mertens & Anneleen De Gendt & Myriam Deveugele & Ann Van Hecke & Peter Pype, 2019. "Interprofessional collaboration within fluid teams: Community nurses' experiences with palliative home care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3680-3690, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleandro Prado & Sonia Marcon & Luciana Kalinke & Marcelle da Silva & Mayckel Barreto & Angelica Takemoto & Marcela Birolim & Carlos Laranjeira, 2022. "Meanings and Experiences of End-of-Life Patients and Their Family Caregivers in Hospital-to-Home Transitions: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm & Ove Andersen & Helle Vendel Petersen, 2018. "Nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports cross‐sectoral communication in relation to medication administration: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 795-806, February.
    2. Sana Sadiq & Khadija Anasse & Najib Slimani, 2022. "The impact of mobile phones on high school students: connecting the research dots," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 252-270, April.
    3. Jitka Vseteckova, 2020. "Psychological Therapy for ICT Literate Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19 - Perceptions on the Acceptability of Online Versus Face to Face Versions of a Mindfulness for Later Life Group," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(1), pages 23912-23916, October.
    4. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    5. Ling, Gabriel Hoh Teck & Suhud, Nur Amiera binti Md & Leng, Pau Chung & Yeo, Lee Bak & Cheng, Chin Tiong & Ahmad, Mohd Hamdan Haji & Matusin, AK Mohd Rafiq AK, 2021. "Factors Influencing Asia-Pacific Countries’ Success Level in Curbing COVID-19: A Review Using a Social–Ecological System (SES) Framework," SocArXiv b9f2w, Center for Open Science.
    6. Rafał Krupiński, 2020. "Virtual Reality System and Scientific Visualisation for Smart Designing and Evaluating of Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Óscar Chiva-Bartoll & Honorato Morente-Oria & Francisco Tomás González-Fernández & Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero, 2020. "Anxiety and Bodily Pain in Older Women Participants in a Physical Education Program. A Multiple Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Gigi Foster, 2020. "The behavioural economics of government responses to COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S3), pages 11-43, December.
    9. Tonata Dengeingei & Laura Uusiku & Olivia N Tuhadeleni & Alice Lifalaza, 2020. "Assessing Knowledge and Practice Regarding the Management of Dysmenorrhea Among Students at University of Namibia Rundu Campus," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 105-105, August.
    10. Craig C Kage & Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz & Mary H Foltz & Rebekah L Lawrence & Taycia L Brandon & Nathaniel E Helwig & Arin M Ellingson, 2020. "Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Morgan, T. Clifton & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2021. "Understanding economic sanctions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on theory and evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Michael Dolph & Gabriel Tremblay & Hoyee Leong, 2021. "Cost Effectiveness of Triplet Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (XVd) in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Based on Results from the Phase III BOSTON Trial," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(11), pages 1309-1325, November.
    13. Zack Cooper & Joseph J. Doyle Jr. & John A. Graves & Jonathan Gruber, 2022. "Do Higher-Priced Hospitals Deliver Higher-Quality Care?," NBER Working Papers 29809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. William Encinosa & Didem Bernard & Thomas M. Selden, 2022. "Opioid and non-opioid analgesic prescribing before and after the CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-52, March.
    15. David G. Blanchflower & Alex Bryson, 2022. "Union Membership Peaks in Midlife," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 124-151, March.
    16. Jiaxin Li & Zijun Zhou & Jianyu Dong & Ying Fu & Yuan Li & Ze Luan & Xin Peng, 2021. "Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Helene Berntzen & Ida Torunn Bjørk & Ann‐Marie Storsveen & Hilde Wøien, 2020. "“Please mind the gap”: A secondary analysis of discomfort and comfort in intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2441-2454, July.
    18. Axel Hallgren & Anders Hansson, 2021. "Conflicting Narratives of Deep Sea Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Elin R. Nilsen & Ulrika Söderhamn & Bjørg Dale, 2019. "Facilitating holistic continuity of care for older patients: Home care nurses’ experiences using checklists," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3478-3491, October.
    20. Esmail Shariati & Ali Dadgari & Seyedeh Solmaz Talebi & Gholam Reza Mahmoodi Shan & Hossein Ebrahimi, 2021. "The Effect of the Web-Based Communication between a Nurse and a Family Member on the Perceived Stress of the Family Member of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: A Parallel Randomized Clini," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(7), pages 1098-1106, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3382-3391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.