IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1999-2008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It is two worlds” cross‐sectoral nurse collaboration related to care transitions: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Helle Vendel Petersen
  • Signe Foged
  • Vibeke Nørholm

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how the hospital and home care nurses talk about and experience cross‐sectoral collaboration related to the transitional care of frail older patients. Background Effective communication and collaboration between nurses involved in care transition are crucial for a safe patient handover. Organisational systems to support cross‐sectoral collaboration have been developed but do not always promote the intended dialogue and precise and useful exchange of information. Other factors may also be of importance to an effective and constructive cross‐sectoral nurse collaboration. Design A qualitative design using thematic analysis. Methods Data were extracted from 24 focus group interviews conducted with registered nurses from eight hospital wards and six municipalities and a total of 165 hr of observations conducted in three hospital wards and three municipalities. The study was reported according to the COREQ guidelines. Results The perception of nursing and care differed across sectors. The nurses expressed having shared goals for the patients—however, these goals derived from different values, the perception of nursing and approach to the patients. The lack of knowledge of each other's working conditions created assumptions and preconceptions, which affected communication and collaboration related to planning and executing care transition negatively. Conclusions The nurses perceived the hospital and home care as" two worlds". The collaboration between the nurses was characterised by insufficient communication and preconceptions rather than concrete knowledge and different cultures and professional identities. It can be questioned whether cross‐sectoral collaboration between nurses should be characterised as interprofessional rather than intraprofessional collaboration as the features of the nurses' collaboration. Relevance to clinical practice Organisational and political systems should recognise that nurses in different sectors are taking care of various aspects of nursing when planning on policies to support cross‐sectoral collaboration. More possibilities for nurses across sectors to meet should be made available.

Suggested Citation

  • Helle Vendel Petersen & Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm, 2019. "“It is two worlds” cross‐sectoral nurse collaboration related to care transitions: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1999-2008, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1999-2008
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca Feo & Alison Kitson & Tiffany Conroy, 2018. "How fundamental aspects of nursing care are defined in the literature: A scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2189-2229, June.
    2. Alison Kitson & Erik Elgaard Soerensen, 2017. "Editorial: Crossing the caring chasm," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1753-1756, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Matteo Danielis, 2021. "To what extent Unfinished Nursing Care tools coincide with the discrete elements of The Fundamentals of Care Framework? A comparative analysis based on a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 239-265, January.
    2. Alvisa Palese & Lucia Cadorin & Marco Testa & Tommaso Geri & Luana Colloca & Giacomo Rossettini, 2019. "Contextual factors triggering placebo and nocebo effects in nursing practice: Findings from a national cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1966-1978, May.
    3. Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Preben Ulrich Pedersen, 2018. "The centrality of the nurse–patient relationship: A Scandinavian perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3197-3204, August.
    4. Alison Kitson, 2018. "Moving on…," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2175-2176, June.
    5. Annamaria Bagnasco & Milko Zanini & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Fiona Timmins & Miss Carolina Galanti & Giuseppe Aleo & Gianluca Catania & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1832-1857, June.
    6. Alexandra Mudd & Rebecca Feo & Tiffany Conroy & Alison Kitson, 2020. "Where and how does fundamental care fit within seminal nursing theories: A narrative review and synthesis of key nursing concepts," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3652-3666, October.
    7. Anett Skorpen Tarberg & Bodil J. Landstad & Torstein Hole & Morten Thronæs & Marit Kvangarsnes, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences of compassionate care in the palliative pathway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4818-4826, December.
    8. Marlene Æ. Jensen & Mette N. Yilmaz & Birgith Pedersen, 2020. "Involving patients and nurses in choosing between two validated questionnaires to identify chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy before implementing in clinical practice—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3847-3859, October.
    9. Annamaria Bagnasco & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Carolina Galanti & Gloria Varone & Gianluca Catania & Milko Zanini & Giuseppe Aleo & Roger Watson & Mark Hayter & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Unmet nursing care needs on medical and surgical wards: A scoping review of patients’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 347-369, February.
    10. Hanna‐Maria Matinolli & Riitta Mieronkoski & Sanna Salanterä, 2020. "Health and medical device development for fundamental care: Scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1822-1831, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1999-2008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.