IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p795-806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports cross‐sectoral communication in relation to medication administration: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Foged
  • Vibeke Nørholm
  • Ove Andersen
  • Helle Vendel Petersen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports communication between hospital and home care nurses in relation to medication administration. Background Medication administration is a complex process involving a high risk of error. Unclear communication and lack of updated information about medication have been identified as the leading cause of medication errors during care transitions. E‐message systems are progressively being used to improve information exchange across sectors, yet little is known about their usage for exchange of medication information between nurses. Design A qualitative design using content analysis. Methods Focus group interviews were conducted with nurses from eight hospital wards and six municipalities (n = 79). Participant observations were conducted in three hospital wards and in three municipalities (165 hr). Results The e‐message system did not provide the information needed by the home care nurses to ensure safe medication administration after discharge due to (1) limitations of the system, (2) hospital nurses’ lack of knowledge about home care nurses’ information needs and (3) hospital nurses’ lack of access to medication information. Due the home care nurses’ perception of responsibility, they bypassed the e‐message system to get the information. Conclusions The home care nurses perceived themselves as the last link in the safety chain. As such, access to adequate information was essential for the nurses to ensure safe medication administration; however, the e‐message system did not support exchange of the information needed. Relevance to clinical practice E‐message systems must meet home care nurses’ need for information to ensure that safe medication administration does not depend on the knowledge of the individual nurse. Moreover, other system factors that influence interprofessional collaboration and nurses’ cross‐sectoral communication must be addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm & Ove Andersen & Helle Vendel Petersen, 2018. "Nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports cross‐sectoral communication in relation to medication administration: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 795-806, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:795-806
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merete Lyngstad & Anders Grimsmo & Dag Hofoss & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2014. "Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3424-3433, December.
    2. Wei Liu & Marie Gerdtz & Elizabeth Manias, 2016. "Creating opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and patient‐centred care: how nurses, doctors, pharmacists and patients use communication strategies when managing medications in an acute ho," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2943-2957, October.
    3. Marja Härkänen & Susanna Saano & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2017. "Using incident reports to inform the prevention of medication administration errors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3486-3499, November.
    4. Jane M Nosbusch & Marianne E Weiss & Kathleen L Bobay, 2011. "An integrated review of the literature on challenges confronting the acute care staff nurse in discharge planning," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 754-774, March.
    5. Elizabeth Manias & Marie Gerdtz & Allison Williams & Michael Dooley, 2015. "Complexities of medicines safety: communicating about managing medicines at transition points of care across emergency departments and medical wards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 69-80, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tinne Dilles & Jana Heczkova & Styliani Tziaferi & Ann Karin Helgesen & Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl & Bart Van Rompaey & Carolien G. Sino & Sue Jordan, 2021. "Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.
    2. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    3. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Elizabeth Manias & Tracey Bucknall & Robyn Woodward-Kron & Carmel Hughes & Christine Jorm & Guncag Ozavci & Kathryn Joseph, 2021. "Interprofessional and Intraprofessional Communication about Older People’s Medications across Transitions of Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Gabriella Facchinetti & Andrea Ianni & Michela Piredda & Anna Marchetti & Daniela D’Angelo & Ivziku Dhurata & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Discharge of older patients with chronic diseases: What nurses do and what they record. An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1719-1727, May.
    7. Marja Härkänen & Kaisa Haatainen & Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen & Merja Miettinen, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence for Identifying the Prevention of Medication Incidents Causing Serious or Moderate Harm: An Analysis Using Incident Reporters’ Views," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Georgia Tobiano & Christine Ting & Christine Ryan & Kim Jenkinson & Lucie Scott & Andrea P. Marshall, 2020. "Front‐line nurses' perceptions of intra‐hospital handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2231-2238, July.
    9. Xi Yu & Ce Li & Xueqin Gao & Furong Liu & Ping Lin, 2018. "Influence of the medication environment on the unsafe medication behaviour of nurses: A path analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2993-3000, August.
    10. Noort, Mark C. & Reader, Tom W. & Gillespie, Alex, 2019. "Speaking up to prevent harm: a systematic review of the safety voice literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100774, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Anna Willman & Kaisa Bjuresäter & Jan Nilsson, 2020. "Newly graduated nurses' clinical competencies and need for further training in acute care hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2209-2220, July.
    12. Marja Härkänen & Alwiena Blignaut & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2018. "Focus group discussions of registered nurses’ perceptions of challenges in the medication administration process," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 431-437, December.
    13. Line Melby & Berit J Brattheim & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2015. "Patients in transition – improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3389-3399, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:795-806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.