IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3424-3433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Merete Lyngstad
  • Anders Grimsmo
  • Dag Hofoss
  • Ragnhild Hellesø

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the experiences of home care nurses with electronic messaging (e‐messaging) and to determine how it influenced their communication with general practitioners. Background Nurses in home care services must collaborate with general practitioners to care for homebound patients. Studies have shown that communication and collaboration are often constrained because they are organised separately and are dispersed. The use of information and communication technology is expected to support communication and to be a tool for increased patient safety and higher‐quality care. Design Cross‐sectional study with group comparisons Methods The data were collected with a mailed questionnaire that was answered by home care nurses (n = 425) who had implemented e‐messaging and by home care nurses in a comparison group who had not implemented e‐messaging (n = 364). The data were analysed using descriptive analyses, chi‐square test, Mann–Whitney U‐test and multilevel analysis. Results The home care nurses who used e‐messages reported to a greater extent that they had communication procedures with general practitioners compared to what the home care nurses in the comparison group reported. The implementation of e‐messaging did not result in timelier communication or differences between the two groups in the use of nonelectronic communication, except for a lower use of faxes in the e‐messaging group. However, the home care nurses who used e‐messaging reported more frequent contacts with general practitioners. Conclusion The results demonstrate that even if e‐messaging was implemented, the home care nurses and the general practitioners continued to use nonelectronic communication methods. Relevance to clinical practice E‐messaging did not replace but rather complemented the communication methods and thereby transformed clinical communication and collaboration. This should be considered when planning and implementing new information technology in primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Merete Lyngstad & Anders Grimsmo & Dag Hofoss & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2014. "Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3424-3433, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3424-3433
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenelle Matic & Patricia M Davidson & Yenna Salamonson, 2011. "Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 184-189, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm & Ove Andersen & Helle Vendel Petersen, 2018. "Nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports cross‐sectoral communication in relation to medication administration: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 795-806, February.
    2. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian‐Guo Yang & Jun Zhang, 2016. "Improving the postoperative handover process in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1062-1072, April.
    2. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Beverly O'Connell & Cherene Ockerby & Mary Hawkins, 2014. "Construct validity and reliability of the Handover Evaluation Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 560-570, February.
    4. Katherine M Ernst & Sara A McComb & Cathaleen Ley, 2018. "Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical–surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1189-1201, March.
    5. Kristina Eivergård & Ingela Enmarker & Mona Livholts & Lena Aléx & Ove Hellzén, 2020. "Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4227-4238, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3424-3433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.