IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v30y2023i3p1473-1494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap

Author

Listed:
  • Morteza Ghobakhloo
  • Mohammad Iranmanesh
  • Manuel E. Morales
  • Mehrbakhsh Nilashi
  • Azlan Amran

Abstract

Although Industry 4.0 was believed to promote sustainable development, it has ignored or misunderstood many prevailing sustainability concerns, which led to the emergence of the Industry 5.0 agenda. While the desirable sustainability values of Industry 5.0 are widely acknowledged, the knowledge of how this agenda can deliver sustainable transformation is lacking. The present study addresses this knowledge gap, explaining how Industry 5.0 transformation should be managed to facilitate sustainable development. Therefore, this study strives to model the underlying mechanism for enabling such transformation. The study conducted a content‐centric review of the literature and identified 11 actions and approaches that serve as enablers of Industry 5.0 transformation. The study further conducted the interpretive structural modeling and structured the enablers as an interpretive model explaining steps needed for enabling Industry 5.0. Finally, the study developed the strategy roadmap for enabling Industry 5.0 transformation and sustainable development. Results emphasized stakeholder salience, highlighting the enabling role of stakeholder integration and collaboration in Industry 5.0 transformation. Proactive governmental support is the most driving enabler of Industry 5.0, whereas eco‐innovation and sustainable value network reformation are among the most complex and hard‐to‐develop enablers. Results offer several implications for policymakers and practitioners, explaining the functionality of each approach and strategy necessary for Industry 5.0 transformation. The roadmap determines the sequential relationships among these approaches and strategies and identifies their optimal development sequence for enabling Industry 5.0 transformation synergistically. Results further identify the codependences among the Industry 5.0 transition enablers and highlight their interactions and complementarities.

Suggested Citation

  • Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Manuel E. Morales & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1473-1494, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:1473-1494
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilherme F. Frederico, 2021. "From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Laura Carraresi & Stefanie Bröring, 2021. "How does business model redesign foster resilience in emerging circular value chains?," Post-Print hal-03267359, HAL.
    3. Pachayappan Murugaiyan & Panneerselvam Ramasamy, 2021. "Analyzing interrelated enablers of industry 4.0 for implementation in present industrial scenario," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1241-1262, April.
    4. Srijit Krishnan & Sumit Gupta & Mathiyazhagan Kaliyan & Vikas Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2021. "Assessing the key enablers for Industry 4.0 adoption using MICMAC analysis: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(5), pages 1049-1071, March.
    5. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Pachayappan Murugaiyan & Panneerselvam Ramasamy, 2021. "Analyzing interrelated enablers of industry 4.0 for implementation in present industrial scenario," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1241-1262, April.
    7. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Manita, Riadh & Elommal, Najoua & Baudier, Patricia & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2020. "The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Elias G. Carayannis & Joanna Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022. "The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3445-3471, December.
    11. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Donald Huisingh, 2022. "Progress and trends in integrating Industry 4.0 within Circular Economy: A comprehensive literature review and future research propositions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 559-579, January.
    12. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Martin Straka, 2022. "Identification of Social and Economic Expectations: Contextual Reasons for the Transformation Process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Judith Terstriep & Dieter Rehfeld & Maria Kleverbeck, 2020. "Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 881-905, July.
    14. Veronica Tibiletti & Pier Luigi Marchini & Katia Furlotti & Alice Medioli, 2021. "Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 896-907, March.
    15. Francisco José Torres‐Ruiz & Manuela Vega‐Zamora & Manuel Parras‐Rosa, 2018. "Sustainable Consumption: Proposal of a Multistage Model to Analyse Consumer Behaviour for Organic Foods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 588-602, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Ioana ENACHE, 2023. "The Impact of Society 5.0 on Supply Chain Management: Opportunities and Challenges," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 280-292, May.
    2. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Ravi Shankar & Laxmi Gupta, 2024. "Modelling risks in transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1275-1320, November.
    4. Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & Anam, Md. Zahidul & Ahmed, Tazim & Ali, Syed Mithun & de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2023. "Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Kolade, Oluwaseun & Owoseni, Adebowale, 2022. "Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Fatih Albayrak & Oğuz Poyrazoğlu, 2024. "A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13486-13508, September.
    7. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    8. Bablu Kumar Dhar & Sabrina Maria Sarkar & Foster K. Ayittey, 2022. "Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: A study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 71-78, January.
    9. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & Niria Goñi Avila & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado & Aura Quiñones Li, 2023. "Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Jonathan Taglialatela & Kevin Pirazzi Maffiola & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2023. "Board of Directors' characteristics and environmental SDGs adoption: an international study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2490-2506, September.
    12. Wen Chen & Changyi Zhu & Qi Cheung & Siying Wu & Jun Zhang & Jia Cao, 2024. "How does digitization enable green innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3832-3854, July.
    13. Broccardo, Laura & Tenucci, Andrea & Agarwal, Reeti & Alshibani, Safiya Mukhtar, 2024. "Steering digitalization and management control maturity in small and medium enterprises (SMEs)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Alexandra Nicoleta Ciucu-Durnoi & Camelia Delcea & Aurelia Stănescu & Cosmin Alexandru Teodorescu & Vanesa Mădălina Vargas, 2024. "Beyond Industry 4.0: Tracing the Path to Industry 5.0 through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Marta Christina Suciu & Doru Alexandru Plesea & Adrian Petre & Adrian Simion & Mircea Ovidiu Mituca & Decebal Dumitrescu & Ana Maria Bocaneala & Ramona Madalina Moroianu & Diana Florentina Nasulea, 2023. "Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Guilherme Francisco Frederico, 2023. "ChatGPT in Supply Chains: Initial Evidence of Applications and Potential Research Agenda," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9, April.
    19. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    20. Ying Wu & Yuanyue Deng, 2024. "Does digital transformation crowd out the employment of lower skill labor?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 726-748, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:1473-1494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.