IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5554-d1103799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Espina-Romero

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo

    (Carrera de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru)

  • Niria Goñi Avila

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez

    (Facultad de Derecho, Universidad del Sinú “Elías Bechara Zainúm”, Monteria 230001, Colombia)

  • Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado

    (Escuela de Postgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Aura Quiñones Li

    (Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad César Vallejo, Lima 15314, Peru)

Abstract

Industry 5.0 arrived and sounded the alarms, warning entrepreneurs to adopt it as quickly as possible; the advantage is that this industry is still in its preliminary stages. However, there is little research on this model in the literature. In this context, the objective of this study was to analyze the current state of industry 5.0 in 215 publications from the Scopus database during the period 2019–2022. The applied methodology was quantitative analysis, with a bibliometric approach supported by the VOSviewer and RStudio software, in addition to the Microsoft Excel application. The results showed: (1) an exponential growth of article and conference paper publications in 2022, all indexed in journals of subject areas such as engineering and computer science; (2) four more industries influenced by i5.0, where the electronics sector leads well above manufacturing, energy and public service; (3) seven research topics associated with i5.0 that deal with the transition from industry 4.0 to 5.0; and (4) six little-explored research topics that would help i5.0 move to a new stage and which are related to environmental sustainability, social sustainability, cobots, bioeconomy, smart cities, and sentiment analysis. This study found a gap in the industry 5.0 literature; therefore, this document serves as a guide for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & Niria Goñi Avila & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Humberto Gutiérrez Hurtado & Aura Quiñones Li, 2023. "Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5554-:d:1103799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Qian Zhang & Yuming Chen & Wanlong Lin & Yao Chen & Tingsong Wang, 2021. "Optimizing Medical Enterprise’s Operations Management considering Corporate Social Responsibility under Industry 5.0," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, November.
    4. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo, 2022. "Fields Touched by Digitalization: Analysis of Scientific Activity in Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Baohong Li & Peng Song & Shi Yin, 2022. "Driving Force Mechanism of the Core Green Technology Innovation of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises towards Industry 5.0 in China," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-18, August.
    6. Abdul Waheed & Majed Alharthi & Sher Zaman Khan & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Role of Industry 5.0 in leveraging the Business Performance: Investigating Impact of Shared-Economy on Firms’ Performance with Intervening Role of i5.0 Technologies," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Angélica Ochoa-Díaz, 2022. "What Are the Topics That Business Ecosystems Navigate? Updating of Scientific Activity and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Gessler, Michael & Bohlinger, Sandra & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga, 2021. "International vocational education and training research: An introduction to the special issue," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15.
    5. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Johnson Ankrah & Ana Monteiro & Helena Madureira, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Data Sources and Tools for Shoreline Change Analysis and Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Davidescu Adriana AnaMaria & Agafiței Marina-Diana & Strat Vasile Alecsandru & Dima Alina Mihaela, 2024. "Mapping the Landscape: A Bibliometric Analysis of Rating Agencies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 67-85.
    10. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Phuong, Luong Anh & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2020. "Mapping the intellectual and conceptual structure of research on gender issues in the family business: A bibliometric review," OSF Preprints jgnrw, Center for Open Science.
    11. Tong Chen & Mo Wang & Jin Su & Jianjun Li, 2023. "Unlocking the Positive Impact of Bio-Swales on Hydrology, Water Quality, and Biodiversity: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Kamil Erdayandi, 2023. "Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    13. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. David N. Matzig & Clemens Schmid & Felix Riede, 2023. "Mapping the field of cultural evolutionary theory and methods in archaeology using bibliometric methods," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Emanuela Gemelli & Eva Olmedo-Moreno & à lvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez & Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote, 2024. "Bibliometric Study of Scientific Output Between 2011 and 2020 Regarding Teaching-Learning of the Sciences Through Comic Books," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    16. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Maksym Obrizan, 2018. "Economists in Ukraine: who are they and where do they publish?," Working Papers 3181, Research Consulting and Development.
    18. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Gour Gobinda Goswami & Tahmid Labib, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Das, Kallol & Patel, Jayesh D. & Sharma, Anuj & Shukla, Yupal, 2023. "Creativity in marketing: Examining the intellectual structure using scientometric analysis and topic modeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5554-:d:1103799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.