IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7472-d1138137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Christina Suciu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    Interdisciplinary Research Group, Romanian Academy, Calea Victoriei 129, 010071 Bucharest, Romania
    Complexity Research Center, National Institute of Economic Research, 13 Septembrie 13, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
    Romanian Academy of Scientists, Ilfov 3, 050094 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Doru Alexandru Plesea

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Petre

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Simion

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mircea Ovidiu Mituca

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Decebal Dumitrescu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana Maria Bocaneala

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ramona Madalina Moroianu

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Diana Florentina Nasulea

    (Economics I Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of core competences as an important catalyst to enable a sustainable transition of business models to Industry 5.0. According to our research based on a scientific methodology, we illustrated that Industry 4.0 might greatly affect the labor market by introducing ITC, AI, IR and AR that will change many jobs in most areas of activity. One alternative solution to diminish these negative effects is to accommodate and prepare the shift to a more human-centric approach. In order to better implement this alternative solution and to generate mid- to long-run positive effects (from an economic, social and environmental perspective), we consider it is imperative that human resources be prepared to understand and to use new technologies. We have focused our research context on European countries. We found that only a part of the European Union Member Countries benefit from the use of human resources with advanced digital skills. Under these circumstances, we consider that only some countries will be able to face the challenges generated by the transition to Industry 5.0, while others, the emergent countries, such as Romania, will have to intensify the complex process of designing competitive and coherent strategies and implement a more efficient and effective mix of policies. This will help to better capitalize the potential sustainable competitive advantage of industries 4.0 and 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Christina Suciu & Doru Alexandru Plesea & Adrian Petre & Adrian Simion & Mircea Ovidiu Mituca & Decebal Dumitrescu & Ana Maria Bocaneala & Ramona Madalina Moroianu & Diana Florentina Nasulea, 2023. "Core Competence—As a Key Factor for a Sustainable, Innovative and Resilient Development Model Based on Industry 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7472-:d:1138137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Marta Gotz & Barbara Jankowska, 2020. "Systemic Change: Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies and Company Competitiveness: Case Studies from a Post-Transition Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 61-78.
    3. J. M. Keynes, 1937. "The General Theory of Employment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 209-223.
    4. Li Zhang & Yongping Xie & Yang Zheng & Wei Xue & Xianrong Zheng & Xiaobo Xu, 2020. "The challenges and countermeasures of blockchain in finance and economics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 691-698, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tahira Rasheed & Arshad Zaheer & Sadaf Manzoor, 2021. "Do Narcissists Tend to Reduce Interpersonal Conflicts in Organizations? The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Ostracism and Interpersonal Conflicts," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(6), pages 43-58.
    2. Roos, Michael W. M., 2015. "The macroeconomics of radical uncertainty," Ruhr Economic Papers 592, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Pierre-Charles Pradier, 2006. "De usu artis conjectandi in jure : quid de oeconomia (politica) ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00274325, HAL.
    4. Edward M. Miller, 1993. "Equivocation in Mathematical Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 37(2), pages 62-67, October.
    5. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    6. Alejandro López-Vera & Andrés D. Pinchao-Rosero & Norberto Rodríguez-Niño, 2018. "Non-Linear Fiscal Multipliers for Public Expenditure and Tax Revenue in Colombia," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 36(85), pages 48-64, April.
    7. Khalil, Elias L., 2010. "The Bayesian fallacy: Distinguishing internal motivations and religious beliefs from other beliefs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 268-280, August.
    8. Cordelius Ilgmann & Martin Menner, 2011. "Negative nominal interest rates: history and current proposals," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 383-405, December.
    9. Laura Alfaro & Anusha Chari & Andrew N. Greenland & Peter K. Schott, 2020. "Aggregate and Firm-Level Stock Returns During Pandemics, in Real Time," NBER Working Papers 26950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Dirk Ulbricht & Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Tobias Thomas, 2017. "Do Media Data Help to Predict German Industrial Production?," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 483-496, August.
    11. Charles J. Whalen, 2012. "Post-Keynesian Institutionalism after the Great Recession," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_724, Levy Economics Institute.
    12. Lawrence A. Boland, 2016. "Econometrics and equilibrium models," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 438-447, July.
    13. Leonardo Boncinelli, 2007. "Choice under Markovian Constraints," Department of Economics University of Siena 516, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Martha Campbell, 1997. "Marx and Keynes on Money," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 65-91, September.
    15. Himounet, Nicolas, 2022. "Searching the nature of uncertainty: Macroeconomic and financial risks VS geopolitical and pandemic risks," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-31.
    16. Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay, 2023. "Modelplasticity and abductive decision making," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 46(1), pages 255-276, June.
    17. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.
    18. Giuseppe Garofalo, 2014. "Irreducible complexities: from Gödel and Turing to the paradigm of Imperfect Knowledge Economics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3463-3474, November.
    19. Francesco Chiacchio & Georgios Petropoulos & David Pichler, 2018. "The impact of industrial robots on EU employment and wages- A local labour market approach," Working Papers 25186, Bruegel.
    20. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Manuel E. Morales & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1473-1494, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7472-:d:1138137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.