IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v57y2024i3p261-273n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Competencies in Formal and Hidden Curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • Ferjan Marko

    (University of Maribor, Faculty of Organisational Sciences, Kranj, Slovenia)

  • Bernik Mojca

    (University of Maribor, Faculty of Organisational Sciences, Kranj, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background purpose Research on digital competence has been one of the most important policy goals in the area of education in the European Union for almost two decades. In 2017, two essential documents were published: DigComp 2.1 - The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels (Carretero et al., 2017) and examples of use and the European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators – DigCompEdu (Redecker, 2017). Despite these documents and all the research in the field of digital competencies, there is still no unified instrument for measuring the digital competencies of citizens. The problem is that digital competencies encompass a wide range of skills, from basic digital literacy to advanced technical proficiency, and they evolve with technological advancements. Researchers and policymakers face several obstacles in creating a one-size-fits-all tool for assessing these competencies. This paper expands existing research in the field of digital competence in formal education in Slovenia. Our research aimed to explore curricular aspects of acquiring digital competencies within the three levels of formal education and the level of achieving digital competencies among citizens (students) in Slovenia. The purpose of our study was to gain a broader understanding of how participants in formal education obtain digital competencies to obtain a publicly recognized qualification within the education system in Slovenia. Design/Methodology/Approach To examine the field of digital competence in formal and hidden curricula, we first survey students (citizens) to assess their self-perception regarding digital competencies. Then, we interviewed teachers from various faculties to identify elements of the hidden curriculum. Finally, we reviewed publicly available educational content regarding acquiring digital competencies in primary and secondary schools and universities. Results The extent of formal teaching of content related to digital competencies within the public education system in Slovenia is small. During the average duration of formal education, a Slovenian citizen listens to approximately 2,000 hours of mathematics lessons, around 1,000 hours of art lessons, and 200 hours of computer science and informatics lessons. The research results have shown that, even in subjects unrelated to computer science, informatics, and digital competencies, students acquire digital competencies as part of the hidden curriculum at universities. The arithmetic mean among students’ (citizens’) research of other competencies indicates that respondents can operate independently. The results of the level of digital competencies according to DigiComp 2.1. show that, except for two competencies; all are within are within level 5. This means that the self-assessed level of digital competencies among students (citizens) has mostly stopped at tasks they perform for their own needs. Conclusion In the future, EU countries will need to standardize the assessment system for digital competencies to determine the level of individuals’ digital competencies. The school system in Slovenia will have to introduce a significant amount of computer science knowledge into the curricula of subjects, with particular attention given to upgrading digital competencies within hidden curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferjan Marko & Bernik Mojca, 2024. "Digital Competencies in Formal and Hidden Curriculum," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 57(3), pages 261-273.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:57:y:2024:i:3:p:261-273:n:1005
    DOI: 10.2478/orga-2024-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/orga-2024-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Redecker, 2017. "European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu," JRC Research Reports JRC107466, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgio Di Pietro & Federico Biagi & Patricia Costa & Zbigniew Karpinski & Jacopo Mazza, 2020. "The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent international datasets," JRC Research Reports JRC121071, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Rushan Ziatdinov & James R. Valles, 2022. "Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Núñez-Canal, Margarita & de Obesso, Mª de las Mercedes & Pérez-Rivero, Carlos Alberto, 2022. "New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Monica Banzato & Francesca Coin, 2019. "Self-Efficacy in Multimodal Narrative Educational Activities: Explorative Study in a Multicultural and Multilingual Italian Primary School," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 148-159.
    5. Mandila Ben Shikomera & Collins K. Matemba & Joash Migosi, 2024. "Emerging Issues in Curriculum and Instruction during Post COVID-19 Era: Experience from South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1743-1763, April.
    6. Jooyoung Lee & Sungeun Suh, 2024. "AI Technology Integrated Education Model for Empowering Fashion Design Ideation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    7. LAHNIN Salah-eddine & ATIFI Jaafar & LOTFI Said, 2024. "Characteristics and Quality Indicators of Vocational Training Performance," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 497-504, November.
    8. Yu Zhao & María Cruz Sánchez Gómez & Ana María Pinto Llorente & Liping Zhao, 2021. "Digital Competence in Higher Education: Students’ Perception and Personal Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Francisco-Ignacio Revuelta-Domínguez & Jorge Guerra-Antequera & Alicia González-Pérez & María-Inmaculada Pedrera-Rodríguez & Alberto González-Fernández, 2022. "Digital Teaching Competence: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Lorena Martín-Párraga & Carmen Llorente-Cejudo & Julio Barroso-Osuna, 2023. "Self-Perception of Digital Competence in University Lecturers: A Comparative Study between Universities in Spain and Peru According to the DigCompEdu Model," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:348-361 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. de Obesso, Maria de las Mercedes & Núñez-Canal, Margarita & Pérez-Rivero, Carlos Alberto, 2023. "How do students perceive educators' digital competence in higher education?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Hyunyoung Choi & Soh-Young Chung & Jangwan Ko, 2021. "Rethinking Teacher Education Policy in ICT: Lessons from Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Tanasciuc Marcela, 2024. "A D-VUCAD Transitioning Analysis on Romanian Higher Education System in the Context of Artificial Intelligence. Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2420-2432.
    15. Artan Veseli & Petrit Hasanaj & Agron Bajraktari, 2025. "Perceptions of Organizational Change Readiness for Sustainable Digital Transformation: Insights from Learning Management System Projects in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Rebeca Bautista Ortuño & Beatriz Bonete-López & Raquel Lorente-Martínez, 2021. "Festival of Audiovisual Micro-Stories in Psychology (Microfest): An Innovative Teaching Project for Students of Audiovisual Communication and Journalism," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Johannes Conrads & Morten Rasmussen & Niall Winters & Anne Geniet & Laurentz Langer, 2017. "Digital Education Policies in Europe and Beyond: Key Design Principles for More Effective Policies," JRC Research Reports JRC109311, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Milena Kajba & Maja Rosi & Vojko Potocan & Borut Jereb, 2022. "Conceptual Model For Quality Assessment Of Digital Competencies In Higher Education Systems – A Case Study Of The Research Process," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 22, pages 51-68.
    19. Miguel Ángel García-Delgado & Sonia Rodríguez-Cano & Vanesa Delgado-Benito & María Lozano-Álvarez, 2023. "Emerging Technologies and Their Link to Digital Competence in Teaching," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Aldo Gordillo & Enrique Barra & Sonsoles López-Pernas & Juan Quemada, 2021. "Development of Teacher Digital Competence in the Area of E-Safety through Educational Video Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    21. Annika Kreuder & Ulrich Frick & Katrin Rakoczy & Sabine J. Schlittmeier, 2024. "Digital competence in adolescents and young adults: a critical analysis of concomitant variables, methodologies and intervention strategies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:57:y:2024:i:3:p:261-273:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.