IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mosaro/v44y2022i2p41-66n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motives for the Usage of Collaborative Fashion Consumption Online Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Michalak Szymon

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Product Marketing, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Bartkowiak Paweł

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Strategic Management, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Ankiel Magdalena

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Product Marketing, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Olejniczak Tomasz

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Product Marketing, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Stachowiak-Krzyżan Magda

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Product Marketing, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in consumer interest in participating in the sharing economy. One of the markets in which this is particularly visible is the clothing market. Dynamic technological progress and the virtualisation of life have contributed to the creation of applications with which consumers can buy, exchange or borrow clothes. The use of this type of application is treated as a manifestation of sustainable consumption. The main aim of the article is to determine the influence of selected motives on the attitudes towards these applications and their use. The article discusses the results of the research conducted in 2021 on a sample of 412 respondents. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used in the process of analysing the results. The research results suggest that the most important motives for using the discussed applications were economic and utility, with their impact on attitudes towards these applications and the willingness to use them confirmed. Social motives turned out to be the lowest-rated group of determinants. Moreover, their negative impact on both attitudes towards the application and the willingness to use it was confirmed. Ecological motives turned out to be relatively important determinants of using the discussed solutions. Their influence on attitudes towards the application and consumption behaviour was confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Michalak Szymon & Bartkowiak Paweł & Ankiel Magdalena & Olejniczak Tomasz & Stachowiak-Krzyżan Magda, 2022. "Motives for the Usage of Collaborative Fashion Consumption Online Platforms," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 41-66, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:41-66:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/minib-2022-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2022-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/minib-2022-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julijana Angelovska & Anita Ceh Casni & Christoph Lutz, 2020. "Turning Consumers Into Providers In The Sharing Economy: Exploring The Impact Of Demographics And Motives," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 29(1), pages 79-100, june.
    2. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7634 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Denis Guiot & Dominique Roux, 2010. "A Second-Hand Shoppers' Motivation Scale: Antecedents, Consequences, and Implications for Retailers," Post-Print halshs-00643839, HAL.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-50.
    7. Iulia Diana Popa & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2019. "Developing the Romanian Organic Market: A Producer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Emma Waight, 2013. "Eco babies: reducing a parent's ecological footprint with second-hand consumer goods," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 197-211.
    9. Cosette M. Armstrong & Kirsi Niinimäki & Chunmin Lang & Sari Kujala, 2016. "A Use‐Oriented Clothing Economy? Preliminary Affirmation for Sustainable Clothing Consumption Alternatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 18-31, January.
    10. Guiot, Denis & Roux, Dominique, 2010. "A Second-hand Shoppers’ Motivation Scale: Antecedents, Consequences, and Implications for Retailers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 355-371.
    11. Habibi, Mohammad Reza & Davidson, Alexander & Laroche, Michel, 2017. "What managers should know about the sharing economy," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 113-121.
    12. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan, 2016. "Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 200-211.
    13. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    14. Kristin Leismann & Martina Schmitt & Holger Rohn & Carolin Baedeker, 2013. "Collaborative Consumption: Towards a Resource-Saving Consumption Culture," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Benoit, Sabine & Baker, Thomas L. & Bolton, Ruth N. & Gruber, Thorsten & Kandampully, Jay, 2017. "A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 219-227.
    16. Žaneta Piligrimienė & Andželika Žukauskaitė & Hubert Korzilius & Jūratė Banytė & Aistė Dovalienė, 2020. "Internal and External Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Giedrius Romeika & Raimonda Kauliene & Justas Streimikis & Rimantas Dapkus, 2020. "ES-QUAL model and customer satisfaction in online banking: evidence from multivariate analysis techniques," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(1), pages 59-93, March.
    18. Geng, Ruoqi & Mansouri, S. Afshin & Aktas, Emel, 2017. "The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 245-258.
    19. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    20. Emine Sarigöllü & Chenxuan Hou & Myriam Ertz, 2021. "Sustainable product disposal: Consumer redistributing behaviors versus hoarding and throwing away," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 340-356, January.
    21. Druckman, Angela & Jackson, Tim, 2010. "The bare necessities: How much household carbon do we really need?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1794-1804, July.
    22. Sae Eun Lee & Hye Jung Jung & Kyu-Hye Lee, 2021. "Motivating Collaborative Consumption in Fashion: Consumer Benefits, Perceived Risks, Service Trust, and Usage Intention of Online Fashion Rental Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    23. Phipps, Marcus & Ozanne, Lucie K. & Luchs, Michael G. & Subrahmanyan, Saroja & Kapitan, Sommer & Catlin, Jesse R. & Gau, Roland & Naylor, Rebecca Walker & Rose, Randall L. & Simpson, Bonnie & Weaver, , 2013. "Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1227-1234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hallem, Associate Professor Yousra & Abbes, Associate Professor Intissar & Hikkerova, Professor Lubica & Taga, Media Planner Nadia, 2021. "A trust model for collaborative redistribution platforms:A platform design issue," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Jiang Jiang & Rui Feng & Eldon Y. Li, 2021. "Uncovering the Providers’ Continuance Intention of Participation in the Sharing Economy: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Sirkeci Kübra & Arıkan Esra, 2021. "The Infinite Wardrobe: Female Consumers’ Value Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Consumption of Apparel," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 150-170, December.
    4. Dabbous, Amal & Tarhini, Abbas, 2019. "Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2022. "“I like to use but do not wish to own†: Exploring the role of de-ownership orientation in the adoption of access-based services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Baek, Eunsoo & Oh, Ga-Eun (Grace), 2021. "Diverse values of fashion rental service and contamination concern of consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 165-175.
    7. Martina Toni & Maria Francesca Renzi & Laura Di Pietro & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Giovanni Mattia, 2021. "The Relation between Collaborative Consumption and Subjective Well-Being: An Analysis of P2P Accommodation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Khodayari, Maryam & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Shahabaldini parizi, Zahra & Shahriari, Elmira, 2022. "Sharing Your Assets: A Holistic Review of Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 604-625.
    9. Steven Kane Curtis & Matthias Lehner, 2019. "Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Małecka, Agnieszka & Mitręga, Maciej & Mróz-Gorgoń, Barbara & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2022. "Adoption of collaborative consumption as sustainable social innovation: Sociability and novelty seeking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 163-179.
    11. Francesca De Canio & Davide Pellegrini & Elisa Martinelli, 2018. "Is the collaborative consumption the new buying? Social and economic aspects influencing collaborative consumption," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 19-38.
    12. Anne Bäro & Felix Toepler & Timo Meynhardt & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2022. "Participating in the sharing economy: The role of individual characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3715-3735, December.
    13. Chan Liu & Raymond K. H. Chan & Maofu Wang & Zhe Yang, 2020. "Mapping the Sharing Economy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Kim, Naeun (Lauren) & Woo, Hongjoo & Ramkumar, Bharath, 2021. "The role of product history in consumer response to online second-hand clothing retail service based on circular fashion," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    16. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2023. "Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    17. Lim, Weng Marc, 2020. "The sharing economy: A marketing perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 4-13.
    18. Palátová, P. & Rinn, R. & Machoň, M. & Paluš, H. & Purwestri, R.C. & Jarský, V., 2023. "Sharing economy in the forestry sector: Opportunities and barriers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Abbes, Intissar & Hallem, Yousra & Taga, Nadia, 2020. "Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Sands, Sean & Ferraro, Carla & Campbell, Colin & Kietzmann, Jan & Andonopoulos, Vasiliki Vicki, 2020. "Who shares? Profiling consumers in the sharing economy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 22-33.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    collaborative fashion consumption; sharing economy; consumer behaviour; motives; structural equation model; sustainable consumption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:41-66:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.