IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v29y2020i2d10.1007_s11749-019-00667-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depth-based weighted jackknife empirical likelihood for non-smooth U-structure equations

Author

Listed:
  • Yongli Sang

    (University of Louisiana at Lafayette)

  • Xin Dang

    (University of Mississippi)

  • Yichuan Zhao

    (Georgia State University)

Abstract

In many applications, parameters of interest are estimated by solving some non-smooth estimating equations with U-statistic structure. Jackknife empirical likelihood (JEL) approach can solve this problem efficiently by reducing the computation complexity of the empirical likelihood (EL) method. However, as EL, JEL suffers the sensitivity problem to outliers. In this paper, we propose a weighted jackknife empirical likelihood (WJEL) to tackle the above limitation of JEL. The proposed WJEL tilts the JEL function by assigning smaller weights to outliers. The asymptotic of the WJEL ratio statistic is derived. It converges in distribution to a multiple of a chi-square random variable. The multiplying constant depends on the weighting scheme. The self-normalized version of WJEL ratio does not require to know the constant and hence yields the standard chi-square distribution in the limit. Robustness of the proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies and one real data application.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongli Sang & Xin Dang & Yichuan Zhao, 2020. "Depth-based weighted jackknife empirical likelihood for non-smooth U-structure equations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 573-598, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00667-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-019-00667-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11749-019-00667-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-019-00667-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunlu Jiang & Shaoli Wang & Wenxiu Ge & Xueqin Wang, 2011. "Depth-based weighted empirical likelihood and general estimating equations," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 1051-1062.
    2. Jing, Bing-Yi & Yuan, Junqing & Zhou, Wang, 2009. "Jackknife Empirical Likelihood," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1224-1232.
    3. Liu, Zhi & Xia, Xiaochao & Zhou, Wang, 2015. "A test for equality of two distributions via jackknife empirical likelihood and characteristic functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 97-114.
    4. Elisa M. Molanes Lopez & Ingrid Van Keilegom & Noël Veraverbeke, 2009. "Empirical Likelihood for Non‐Smooth Criterion Functions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 413-432, September.
    5. Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng & Wang, Ruodu & Yang, Jingping, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood method for some risk measures and related quantities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 142-150.
    6. Glenn, N.L. & Zhao, Yichuan, 2007. "Weighted empirical likelihood estimates and their robustness properties," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(10), pages 5130-5141, June.
    7. Zhouping Li & Jinfeng Xu & Wang Zhou, 2016. "On Nonsmooth Estimating Functions via Jackknife Empirical Likelihood," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 49-69, March.
    8. Liang Peng & Yongcheng Qi & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood method for copulas," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 74-92, March.
    9. Xin Dang & Robert Serfling & Weihua Zhou, 2009. "Influence functions of some depth functions, and application to depth-weighted L-statistics," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 49-66.
    10. Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood method for copulas," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2012013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    11. Feng, Huijun & Peng, Liang, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood tests for error distributions in regression models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-75.
    12. Li, Minqiang & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2011. "Reduce computation in profile empirical likelihood method," MPRA Paper 33744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Wu, Changbao, 2004. "Weighted empirical likelihood inference," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 67-79, January.
    14. Zhang, Rongmao & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2012. "Jackknife-blockwise empirical likelihood methods under dependence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 56-72, February.
    15. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 1999. "Asymptotic Properties of Weighted M-Estimators for Variable Probability Samples," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(6), pages 1385-1406, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongcheng Qi, 2018. "Jackknife Empirical Likelihood Methods," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(2), pages 20-22, June.
    2. Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu, 2019. "Jackknife, small bandwidth and high-dimensional asymptotics," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 605, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    3. Ai-Ai Liu & Han-Ying Liang, 2017. "Jackknife empirical likelihood of error variance in partially linear varying-coefficient errors-in-variables models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 95-122, March.
    4. Zhang, Zhigang & Zhao, Yichuan, 2013. "Empirical likelihood for linear transformation models with interval-censored failure time data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 398-409.
    5. Xiaohui Yuan & Huixian Li & Tianqing Liu, 2021. "Empirical likelihood inference for rank regression with doubly truncated data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 25-73, March.
    6. Xiaohui Liu & Qihua Wang & Yi Liu, 2017. "A consistent jackknife empirical likelihood test for distribution functions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(2), pages 249-269, April.
    7. Harold D. Chiang & Bing Yang Tan, 2020. "Empirical likelihood and uniform convergence rates for dyadic kernel density estimation," Papers 2010.08838, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    8. Khan, Ruhul Ali, 2023. "Two-sample nonparametric test for proportional reversed hazards," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Amorim, G. & Thas, O. & Vermeulen, K. & Vansteelandt, S. & De Neve, J., 2018. "Small sample inference for probabilistic index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-148.
    10. Yang Wei & Zhouping Li & Yunqiu Dai, 2022. "Unified smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood tests for comparing income inequality indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 1415-1475, October.
    11. Xue Yu & Yichuan Zhao, 2019. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the accelerated failure time model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 269-288, March.
    12. Zhang, Rongmao & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2012. "Jackknife-blockwise empirical likelihood methods under dependence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 56-72, February.
    13. Zang, Yangguang & Zhang, Sanguo & Li, Qizhai & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2016. "Jackknife empirical likelihood test for high-dimensional regression coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 302-316.
    14. Yawen Fan & Xiaohui Liu & Yang Cao & Shaochu Liu, 2024. "Jackknife empirical likelihood based diagnostic checking for Ar(p) models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2479-2509, July.
    15. Liang Peng & Yongcheng Qi & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood method for copulas," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 74-92, March.
    16. Gong, Yun & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2010. "Smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood method for ROC curve," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(6), pages 1520-1531, July.
    17. Liang Peng & Yongcheng Qi, 2010. "Smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood method for tail copulas," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 514-536, November.
    18. Esmeralda Ramalho, 2004. "Covariate Measurement Error in Endogenous Stratified Samples," Economics Working Papers 2_2004, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    19. Michael Baker & Nicole M. Fortin, 2001. "Occupational gender composition and wages in Canada, 1987–1988," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 345-376, May.
    20. Donna K. Ginther & Kathy J. Hayes, 2003. "Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion for Faculty in the Humanities 1977–95," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 38(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00667-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.