IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v59y2018i5d10.1007_s11162-017-9477-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Psychological Contracts of Undergraduate University Students: Who Do They See as Exchange Partners, and What Do They Think the Deals Are?

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua R. Knapp

    (University of Wisconsin-Whitewater)

  • Suzanne S. Masterson

    (University of Cincinnati)

Abstract

The relationship between students and their academic institution is based on exchange. However, we have limited knowledge regarding how many exchanges students perceive, who (or what) the perceived exchange partners are, and what the perceived terms of those exchanges contain. To address this gap, we utilized a mixed-method approach to explore and describe the psychological contracts of two sets of undergraduate university students: newly entering freshman, and experienced university students. Results clearly demonstrated that students perceive numerous psychological contracts relevant to their education with a variety of partners both inside and at the boundaries of the institution. Results also demonstrated that these contracts are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct. The overarching implication of these findings is that students navigate a web of diverse exchange partners, and it would be a mistake for educators and researchers to focus exclusively on one or few relationships presupposed to be most important.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua R. Knapp & Suzanne S. Masterson, 2018. "The Psychological Contracts of Undergraduate University Students: Who Do They See as Exchange Partners, and What Do They Think the Deals Are?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 650-679, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:59:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11162-017-9477-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-017-9477-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-017-9477-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-017-9477-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackie Coyle‐Shapiro & Ian Kessler, 2000. "Consequences Of The Psychological Contract For The Employment Relationship: A Large Scale Survey," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 903-930, November.
    2. Shih, Chih-Ting & Chen, Shyh-Jer, 2011. "The Social Dilemma Perspective on Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 125-151, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costa Pinto, Lígia M. & Sá, Carla & Soares, Nuno & Sousa, Sílvia & Valente, Marieta, 2020. "The case for academic hazing as a rational choice: An economic approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 51-62.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Protsiuk Olga, 2019. "The Relationships Between Psychological Contract Expectations and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employer Perception," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 85-106, September.
    2. Chih-Ting Shih & Cheng-Chen Lin, 2014. "From good friends to good soldiers: A psychological contract perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 309-326, March.
    3. Sally Sambrook & Delia Wainwright, 2010. "The Psychological Contract: Who's Contracting with Whom? Towards a Conceptual Model," Working Papers 10013, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    4. Kenneth De Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David A. Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2023. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    5. Heffernan Margaret & Rochford Eoin, 2017. "Psychological contract breach and turnover intention: the moderating effects of social status and local ties," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 99-115.
    6. Julie Rayner & Alan Lawton & Helen Williams, 2012. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Public Service Ethos: Whither the Organization?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 117-130, March.
    7. Michael White & Alex Bryson, 2019. "The Impact of High-Performance Work Systems on Employees: A Sectoral Comparison," DoQSS Working Papers 19-04, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    8. Susanna Gallani & Ranjani Krishnan & Eric J. Marinich & Michael D. Shields, 2019. "Budgeting, Psychological Contracts, and Budgetary Misreporting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2924-2945, June.
    9. Christelle Tornikoski, 2011. "The role of perceived employer obligations in the interpretation of and reaction to expatriate compensation practices," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00675160, HAL.
    10. Cam Caldwell & Larry Floyd & Ryan Atkins & Russell Holzgrefe, 2012. "Ethical Duties of Organizational Citizens: Obligations Owed by Highly Committed Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 285-299, October.
    11. Violet T. Ho & Laurie L. Levesque, 2005. "With a Little Help from My Friends (and Substitutes): Social Referents and Influence in Psychological Contract Fulfillment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 275-289, June.
    12. Heywood, John S. & Siebert, W. Stanley & Wei, Xiangdong, 2005. "High Performance Workplaces and Family Friendly Practices: Promises Made and Promises Kept," IZA Discussion Papers 1812, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Wenlong Liu & Changqing He & Yi Jiang & Rongrong Ji & Xuesong Zhai, 2020. "Effect of Gig Workers’ Psychological Contract Fulfillment on Their Task Performance in a Sharing Economy—A Perspective from the Mediation of Organizational Identification and the Moderation of Length ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Fatma Çam Kahraman & V. Lale Tüzüner, 2022. "Workplace Flexibility and Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Psychological Contract," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(92), pages 61-81, June.
    15. Christelle Tornikoski, 2011. "The role of perceived employer obligations in the interpretation of and reaction to expatriate compensation practices," Post-Print hal-00675160, HAL.
    16. Thomas Zagenczyk & Ray Gibney & W. Few & Kristin Scott, 2011. "Psychological Contracts and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 254-281, September.
    17. Chieh-Peng Lin & Chou-Kang Chiu & Na-Ting Liu, 2019. "Developing virtual team performance: an integrated perspective of social exchange and social cognitive theories," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 671-688, August.
    18. Michael White & Alex Bryson, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," DoQSS Working Papers 18-10, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    19. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Josh Gullett & Loc Do & Maria Canuto-Carranco & Mark Brister & Shundricka Turner & Cam Caldwell, 2009. "The Buyer–Supplier Relationship: An Integrative Model of Ethics and Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 329-341, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:59:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11162-017-9477-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.