IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v81y2016i4d10.1007_s11336-016-9506-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Wu

    (Boston College)

  • Ryne Estabrook

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

This article considers the identification conditions of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models for ordered categorical outcomes with invariance of different types of parameters across groups. The current practice of invariance testing is to first identify a model with only configural invariance and then test the invariance of parameters based on this identified baseline model. This approach is not optimal because different identification conditions on this baseline model identify the scales of latent continuous responses in different ways. Once an invariance condition is imposed on a parameter, these identification conditions may become restrictions and define statistically non-equivalent models, leading to different conclusions. By analyzing the transformation that leaves the model-implied probabilities of response patterns unchanged, we give identification conditions for models with invariance of different types of parameters without referring to a specific parametrization of the baseline model. Tests based on this approach have the advantage that they do not depend on the specific identification condition chosen for the baseline model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Wu & Ryne Estabrook, 2016. "Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1014-1045, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-016-9506-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Meredith, 1964. "Notes on factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 177-185, June.
    2. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    3. William Meredith, 1964. "Rotation to achieve factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 187-206, June.
    4. Steven Boker & Michael Neale & Hermine Maes & Michael Wilde & Michael Spiegel & Timothy Brick & Jeffrey Spies & Ryne Estabrook & Sarah Kenny & Timothy Bates & Paras Mehta & John Fox, 2011. "OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 306-317, April.
    5. Hao Wu & Michael Neale, 2013. "On the Likelihood Ratio Tests in Bivariate ACDE Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 441-463, July.
    6. Neal O. Jeffries, 2003. "A note on 'Testing the number of components in a normal mixture'," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 991-994, December.
    7. Anders Christoffersson, 1975. "Factor analysis of dichotomized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(1), pages 5-32, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Manasi Murthy Mittinty & Pedro H. R. Santiago & Lisa Jamieson, 2022. "Assessment of Pain-Related Fear in Indigenous Australian Populations Using the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-9 (FPQ-9)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Yu-Wei Chang & Nan-Jung Hsu & Rung-Ching Tsai, 2017. "Unifying Differential Item Functioning in Factor Analysis for Categorical Data Under a Discretization of a Normal Variant," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 382-406, June.
    4. Hartung, Johanna & Goecke, Benjamin & Schroeders, Ulrich & Schmitz, Florian & Wilhelm, Oliver, 2022. "Latin square tasks: A multi-study evaluation," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini & Zhang, H, 2020. "A note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Lazaridis, Alexandros & Vetter, Marco & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2022. "Domain-specificity of Flynn effects in the CHC-model: Stratum II test score changes in Germanophone samples (1996–2018)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Attanasio, Orazio & Blundell, Richard & Conti, Gabriella & Mason, Giacomo, 2020. "Inequality in socio-emotional skills: A cross-cohort comparison," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Pietschnig, Jakob & Deimann, Pia & Hirschmann, Nicole & Kastner-Koller, Ursula, 2021. "The Flynn effect in Germanophone preschoolers (1996–2018): Small effects, erratic directions, and questionable interpretations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Ziqin Liang & Elisa Delvecchio & Adriana Lis & Claudia Mazzeschi, 2023. "Italian Validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Carlos Miguel Lemos & Ross Joseph Gore & Ivan Puga-Gonzalez & F LeRon Shults, 2019. "Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    11. João Marôco & Hugo Assunção & Heidi Harju-Luukkainen & Su-Wei Lin & Pou-Seong Sit & Kwok-cheung Cheung & Benvindo Maloa & Ivana Stepanović Ilic & Thomas J Smith & Juliana A D B Campos, 2020. "Predictors of academic efficacy and dropout intention in university students: Can engagement suppress burnout?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Dandara Gabriela Haag & Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago & Davi Manzini Macedo & João Luiz Bastos & Yin Paradies & Lisa Jamieson, 2020. "Development and initial psychometric assessment of the race-related attitudes and multiculturalism scale in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Hao Wu, 2016. "A Note on the Identifiability of Fixed-Effect 3PL Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1093-1097, December.
    14. Tomas Lazdauskas & Sean C. McDevitt, 2023. "The Chess–Thomas Adult Temperament Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Lithuanian Version," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Dan Gheorghe Paun & Veronica Mindrescu & Cristian Cătună, 2023. "Yoga, an Appurtenant Method to Improve the Sports Performance of Elite Romanian Athletes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Gregor Sočan & Gaja Zager Kocjan, 2022. "Person-level assessment of measurement invariance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3481-3503, October.
    17. Yunxiao Chen & Irini Moustaki & Haoran Zhang, 2020. "A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 996-1012, December.
    18. Veljko Jovanović & Maksim Rudnev & Naved Iqbal & Sean P. M. Rice & Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska, 2022. "Cross-Cultural Measurement of Positive and Negative Emotions in Adolescence: Evidence from Three Countries," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3143-3160, October.
    19. Guey-Shin Shyu & Shinn-Jou Lin & Wei-Ta Fang & Bai-You Cheng, 2020. "How to Screen Suitable Service Improve Community Health Care Services by University Students in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Carle, 2010. "Interpreting the results of studies using latent variable models to assess data quality: an empirical example using confirmatory factor analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 483-497, April.
    2. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    3. Wilson, Christopher J. & Bowden, Stephen C. & Byrne, Linda K. & Joshua, Nicole R. & Marx, Wolfgang & Weiss, Lawrence G., 2023. "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Bruce Bloxom, 1972. "Alternative approaches to factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 425-440, December.
    5. Edgar Merkle & Achim Zeileis, 2013. "Tests of Measurement Invariance Without Subgroups: A Generalization of Classical Methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 59-82, January.
    6. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
    7. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    8. K. Jöreskog, 1971. "Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 409-426, December.
    9. Pilar Rivera & Albert Satorra, 2000. "Country effects in ISSP-1993 environmental data: Comparison of SEM approaches," Economics Working Papers 458, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Alexander Robitzsch, 2023. "Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Scholderer, Joachim & Grunert, Klaus G. & Brunso, Karen, 2005. "A procedure for eliminating additive bias from cross-cultural survey data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-78, January.
    12. Jolynn Pek & R. Philip Chalmers & Bethany E. Kok & Diane Losardo, 2015. "Visualizing Confidence Bands for Semiparametrically Estimated Nonlinear Relations Among Latent Variables," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(4), pages 402-423, August.
    13. Roger Millsap, 2007. "Invariance in Measurement and Prediction Revisited," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 461-473, December.
    14. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.
    15. Piia Seppälä & Saija Mauno & Taru Feldt & Jari Hakanen & Ulla Kinnunen & Asko Tolvanen & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2009. "The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 459-481, August.
    16. Cernat, Alexandru, 2015. "Using equivalence testing to disentangle selection and measurement in mixed modes surveys," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-01, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    17. Epskamp, Sacha & Cramer, Angélique O.J. & Waldorp, Lourens J. & Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny, 2012. "qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i04).
    18. Liat Ayalon, 2018. "Perceived Age Discrimination: A Precipitator or a Consequence of Depressive Symptoms?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 860-869.
    19. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    20. Steven Andrew Culpepper & Herman Aguinis & Justin L. Kern & Roger Millsap, 2019. "High-Stakes Testing Case Study: A Latent Variable Approach for Assessing Measurement and Prediction Invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 285-309, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-016-9506-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.