IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v14y2020icp145-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective heterogeneity in response attitude for multivariate ordinal outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Simone, Rosaria
  • Tutz, Gerhard
  • Iannario, Maria

Abstract

Traditional statistical models with random effects account for heterogeneity in the population with respect to the location of the response in a subject-specific way. This approach ignores that also uncertainty of the responses can vary across individuals and items: for example, subject-specific indecision may play a role in the rating process relative to questionnaire items. In this setting, a generalized mixture model is advanced that accounts for subjective heterogeneity in response behaviour for multivariate ordinal responses: to this aim, random effects are specified for the individual propensity to a structured or an uncertain response attitude. Simulations and a case study illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and its implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone, Rosaria & Tutz, Gerhard & Iannario, Maria, 2020. "Subjective heterogeneity in response attitude for multivariate ordinal outcomes," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 145-158.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:14:y:2020:i:c:p:145-158
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306219300243
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2014. "Modeling rating data with Nonlinear CUB models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-118.
    2. Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2006. "Multilevel modelling of complex survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 805-827, October.
    3. Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 233-252, August.
    4. Alan Agresti & Ranjini Natarajan, 2001. "Modeling Clustered Ordered Categorical Data: A Survey," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 69(3), pages 345-371, December.
    5. Gerhard Tutz & Micha Schneider & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(2), pages 281-305, June.
    6. Gerhard Tutz & Margret-Ruth Oelker, 2017. "Modelling Clustered Heterogeneity: Fixed Effects, Random Effects and Mixtures," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 204-227, August.
    7. Tutz, Gerhard & Hennevogl, Wolfgang, 1996. "Random effects in ordinal regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 537-557, September.
    8. D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    9. Anna Gottard & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "Varying uncertainty in CUB models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 225-244, June.
    10. Maria Iannario, 2012. "Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Rosaria Simone & Gerhard Tutz, 2018. "Modelling uncertainty and response styles in ordinal data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 224-245, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2022. "A mixture model for ordinal variables measured on semantic differential scales," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 98-123.
    2. Rosaria Simone, 2021. "An accelerated EM algorithm for mixture models with uncertainty for rating data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 691-714, March.
    3. Cong, Lin & Yao, Weixin, 2021. "A Likelihood Ratio Test of a Homoscedastic Multivariate Normal Mixture Against a Heteroscedastic Multivariate Normal Mixture," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 79-88.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Nardo & R. Simone, 2019. "A model-based fuzzy analysis of questionnaires," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 187-215, June.
    2. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2022. "A mixture model for ordinal variables measured on semantic differential scales," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 98-123.
    3. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    4. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    5. Ryan H. L. Ip & K. Y. K. Wu, 2024. "A mixture distribution for modelling bivariate ordinal data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 4453-4488, September.
    6. Rosaria Simone, 2021. "An accelerated EM algorithm for mixture models with uncertainty for rating data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 691-714, March.
    7. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano, 2019. "Likelihood-based tests for a class of misspecified finite mixture models for ordinal categorical data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1175-1202, December.
    8. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2015. "Identifiability of a model for discrete frequency distributions with a multidimensional parameter space," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 302-316.
    9. Capecchi, Stefania & Amato, Mario & Sodano, Valeria & Verneau, Fabio, 2019. "Understanding beliefs and concerns towards palm oil: Empirical evidence and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Maurizio Carpita & Enrico Ciavolino & Mariangela Nitti, 2019. "The MIMIC–CUB Model for the Prediction of the Economic Public Opinions in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 287-305, November.
    11. Francesca Iorio & Riccardo Lucchetti & Rosaria Simone, 2024. "Testing distributional assumptions in CUB models for the analysis of rating data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(3), pages 669-701, September.
    12. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "A Rating Scale Mixture Model to Account for the Tendency to Middle and Extreme Categories," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 682-716, December.
    13. Rosaria Simone, 2023. "Uncertainty Diagnostics of Binomial Regression Trees for Ordered Rating Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 79-105, April.
    14. Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano & Mirko Buonocore, 2018. "Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 205-236, August.
    15. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2014. "Modeling rating data with Nonlinear CUB models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-118.
    16. Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 233-252, August.
    17. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 477-493, September.
    18. Stefania Capecchi & Romina Gambacorta & Rosaria Simone & Domenico Piccolo, 2024. "Modelling cognitive response patterns to survey questions using the class of CUB models," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 885, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Gerhard Tutz & Micha Schneider & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(2), pages 281-305, June.
    20. Li, Yonghai & Schafer, Daniel W., 2008. "Likelihood analysis of the multivariate ordinal probit regression model for repeated ordinal responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3474-3492, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:14:y:2020:i:c:p:145-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.