IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v49y2005i3p917-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixture model for preferences data analysis

Author

Listed:
  • D'Elia, Angela
  • Piccolo, Domenico

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:49:y:2005:i:3:p:917-934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(04)00198-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy, Thomas Brendan & Martin, Donal, 2003. "Mixtures of distance-based models for ranking data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 645-655, January.
    2. Philip Yu, 2000. "Bayesian analysis of order-statistics models for ranking data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 281-299, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Paul H. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2010. "Distance-based tree models for ranking data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1672-1682, June.
    2. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Vincenzina Vitale, 2022. "A Kemeny Distance-Based Robust Fuzzy Clustering for Preference Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 600-647, November.
    3. Irurozki, Ekhine & Calvo, Borja & Lozano, Jose A., 2016. "PerMallows: An R Package for Mallows and Generalized Mallows Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i12).
    4. Wiltrud Kuhlisch & Magnus Roos & Jörg Rothe & Joachim Rudolph & Björn Scheuermann & Dietrich Stoyan, 2016. "A statistical approach to calibrating the scores of biased reviewers of scientific papers," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 37-57, January.
    5. Philip Yu & Paul Lee & W. Wan, 2013. "Factor analysis for paired ranked data with application on parent–child value orientation preference data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1915-1945, October.
    6. Biernacki, Christophe & Jacques, Julien, 2013. "A generative model for rank data based on insertion sort algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 162-176.
    7. Cascón, J.M. & González-Arteaga, T. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2022. "A new preference classification approach: The λ-dissensus cluster algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Antonio D’Ambrosio & Carmela Iorio & Michele Staiano & Roberta Siciliano, 2019. "Median constrained bucket order rank aggregation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 787-802, June.
    9. Amodio, S. & D’Ambrosio, A. & Siciliano, R., 2016. "Accurate algorithms for identifying the median ranking when dealing with weak and partial rankings under the Kemeny axiomatic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 667-676.
    10. Mark S. Handcock & Adrian E. Raftery & Jeremy M. Tantrum, 2007. "Model‐based clustering for social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 301-354, March.
    11. Isobel Claire Gormley & Thomas Brendan Murphy, 2006. "Analysis of Irish third‐level college applications data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(2), pages 361-379, March.
    12. Luis A. Guzman & Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia & Julian Arellana & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2023. "User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 751-771, June.
    13. Marie-Louise Lackner & Martin Lackner, 2017. "On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(4), pages 717-745, April.
    14. Lee, Paul H. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2012. "Mixtures of weighted distance-based models for ranking data with applications in political studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2486-2500.
    15. Antonio D’Ambrosio & Willem J. Heiser, 2016. "A Recursive Partitioning Method for the Prediction of Preference Rankings Based Upon Kemeny Distances," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 774-794, September.
    16. Xu, Hang & Alvo, Mayer & Yu, Philip L.H., 2018. "Angle-based models for ranking data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-136.
    17. Keefe Murphy & T. Brendan Murphy & Raffaella Piccarreta & I. Claire Gormley, 2021. "Clustering longitudinal life‐course sequences using mixtures of exponential‐distance models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(4), pages 1414-1451, October.
    18. Bohning, Dankmar & Seidel, Wilfried, 2003. "Editorial: recent developments in mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 349-357, January.
    19. Amadou Sawadogo & Simplice Dossou-Gbété & Dominique Lafon, 2017. "Ties in one block comparison experiments: a generalization of the Mallows–Bradley–Terry ranking model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(14), pages 2621-2644, October.
    20. Antoine Rolland & Jean-Baptiste Aubin & Irène Gannaz & Samuela Leoni, 2024. "Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(2), pages 377-400, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:49:y:2005:i:3:p:917-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.