IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v90y2024i3d10.1007_s10898-024-01418-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalized alternating direction implicit method for consensus optimization: application to distributed sparse logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • Weiyang Ding

    (Fudan University
    Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology)

  • Michael K. Ng

    (Hong Kong Baptist University)

  • Wenxing Zhang

    (University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

Abstract

A large family of paradigmatic models arising in the area of image/signal processing, machine learning and statistics regression can be boiled down to consensus optimization. This paper is devoted to a class of consensus optimization by reformulating it as monotone plus skew-symmetric inclusion. We propose a distributed optimization method by deploying the algorithmic framework of generalized alternating direction implicit method. Under some mild conditions, the proposed method converges globally. Furthermore, the preconditioner is exploited to expedite the efficiency of the proposed method. Numerical simulations on sparse logistic regression are implemented by variant distributed fashions. Compared to some state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method exhibits appealing numerical performances, especially when the relaxation factor approaches to zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiyang Ding & Michael K. Ng & Wenxing Zhang, 2024. "A generalized alternating direction implicit method for consensus optimization: application to distributed sparse logistic regression," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 727-753, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:90:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10898-024-01418-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-024-01418-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-024-01418-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-024-01418-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bingsheng He & Feng Ma & Xiaoming Yuan, 2020. "Optimally linearizing the alternating direction method of multipliers for convex programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 361-388, March.
    2. Jonathan Eckstein, 2017. "A Simplified Form of Block-Iterative Operator Splitting and an Asynchronous Algorithm Resembling the Multi-Block Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 155-182, April.
    3. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    4. Patrick L. Combettes & Jean-Christophe Pesquet, 2011. "Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Heinz H. Bauschke & Regina S. Burachik & Patrick L. Combettes & Veit Elser & D. Russell Luke & Henry (ed.), Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, chapter 0, pages 185-212, Springer.
    5. Bartlett, Peter L. & Jordan, Michael I. & McAuliffe, Jon D., 2006. "Convexity, Classification, and Risk Bounds," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 138-156, March.
    6. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2006. "Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis M. Briceño-Arias & Giovanni Chierchia & Emilie Chouzenoux & Jean-Christophe Pesquet, 2019. "A random block-coordinate Douglas–Rachford splitting method with low computational complexity for binary logistic regression," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 707-726, April.
    2. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    3. David Degras, 2021. "Sparse group fused lasso for model segmentation: a hybrid approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(3), pages 625-671, September.
    4. Minh Pham & Xiaodong Lin & Andrzej Ruszczyński & Yu Du, 2021. "An outer–inner linearization method for non-convex and nondifferentiable composite regularization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 179-202, September.
    5. Majela Pentón Machado & Mauricio Romero Sicre, 2023. "A Projective Splitting Method for Monotone Inclusions: Iteration-Complexity and Application to Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 552-587, August.
    6. Guan Yu & Yufeng Liu, 2016. "Sparse Regression Incorporating Graphical Structure Among Predictors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 707-720, April.
    7. Rafael E. Carrillo & Martin Leblanc & Baptiste Schubnel & Renaud Langou & Cyril Topfel & Pierre-Jean Alet, 2020. "High-Resolution PV Forecasting from Imperfect Data: A Graph-Based Solution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Patrick R. Johnstone & Jonathan Eckstein, 2021. "Single-forward-step projective splitting: exploiting cocoercivity," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 125-166, January.
    9. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    10. Mauricio Romero Sicre, 2020. "On the complexity of a hybrid proximal extragradient projective method for solving monotone inclusion problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 991-1019, July.
    11. Yunda Dong, 2021. "Weak convergence of an extended splitting method for monotone inclusions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 257-277, January.
    12. Jun Yan & Jian Huang, 2012. "Model Selection for Cox Models with Time-Varying Coefficients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 419-428, June.
    13. Steffen Borgwardt & Rafael M. Frongillo, 2019. "Power Diagram Detection with Applications to Information Elicitation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 184-196, April.
    14. Ye, Ya-Fen & Shao, Yuan-Hai & Deng, Nai-Yang & Li, Chun-Na & Hua, Xiang-Yu, 2017. "Robust Lp-norm least squares support vector regression with feature selection," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 32-52.
    15. Bakalli, Gaetan & Guerrier, Stéphane & Scaillet, Olivier, 2023. "A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    16. Ernest K. Ryu & Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for pathological convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 747-778, December.
    17. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    18. Peng, Heng & Lu, Ying, 2012. "Model selection in linear mixed effect models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 109-129.
    19. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    20. G. Aneiros & P. Vieu, 2016. "Sparse nonparametric model for regression with functional covariate," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 839-859, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:90:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10898-024-01418-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.