IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v8y1994i1p45-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Labour Market Position of Women in Spain and the UK with Reference to the `Flexible' Labour Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Cousins

    (Sociology at the University of Hertfordshire)

Abstract

This compares women's employment in Spain and the UK in the context of very different historical and institutional developments in each country. A number of key variations in women's labour market position, for example, participation rates, part-time, temporary work and unemployment rates, are examined and in each area it is found that there are substantial differences in the patterns of women's economic activity. A contribution is also made to the debate on the non-standard or flexible workforce by focusing on the issue of recent changes in labour market deregulation in the two countries and the importance of the informal economy in Spain. In both countries the state has pursued policies of deregulation of the labour market to produce a more flexible workforce. Employers have drawn on a hidden labour supply of married women who in turn have been incorporated into the economy through forms of non-standard work, in the UK this has been part-time work and in Spain either temporary work or irregular or illegal forms of work in the informal economy. It is argued that these developments may have negative consequences for both countries with respect to training, skill and wage levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Cousins, 1994. "A Comparison of the Labour Market Position of Women in Spain and the UK with Reference to the `Flexible' Labour Debate," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(1), pages 45-67, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:1:p:45-67
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709481003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709481003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709481003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Marsden, 1992. "Pay And Employment In The New Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 301.
    2. Dex, Shirley & Walters, Patricia, 1992. "Franco-British Comparisons of Women's Labour Supply and the Effects of Social Policies," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 89-112, January.
    3. Catherine Hakim, 1993. "The Myth of Rising Female Employment," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(1), pages 97-120, March.
    4. Schoer, Karl, 1987. "Part-time Employment: Britain and West Germany," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 83-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernd Fitzenberger & Gaby Wunderlich, 2004. "The Changing Life Cycle Pattern In Female Employment: A Comparison Of Germany And The Uk," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(3), pages 302-328, August.
    2. Rowthorn, Bob & Glyn, Andrew, 1990. "The diversity of unemployment experience since 1973," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 57-89, June.
    3. Steffen Hillmert, 2002. "Deregulation of the labor market and chances of employment in Great Britain," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Tony Bovaird, 1993. "Analysing Urban Economic Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(4-5), pages 631-658, May.
    5. Christina Jonung & Inga Persson, 1993. "Women and Market Work: The Misleading Tale of Participation Rates in International Comparisons," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(2), pages 259-274, June.
    6. Linda Hantrais, 1997. "Exploring Relationships between Social Policy and Changing Family Forms within the European Union," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 339-379, December.
    7. Jill Rubery & Colette Fagan, 1995. "Comparative Industrial Relations Research: Towards Reversing the Gender Bias," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 209-236, June.
    8. Deidre Wicks & Gita Mishra & Lisa Milne, 2002. "Young Women, Work and Inequality: Is it What They Want or What They Get? An Australian Contribution to Research on Women and Workforce Participation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(3), pages 3-18, August.
    9. Hodgkinson, A., 1999. "Employee Involvment and Participation in the Organisational Change Decision: Illawarra and Australian Patterns," Economics Working Papers wp99-7, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    10. Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente, 2002. "Spain and the Neoliberal Paradigm," SCEPA working paper series. 2002-02, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    11. Jay Ginn & Sara Arber, 2002. "Degrees of Freedom: Do Graduate Women escape the Motherhood Gap in Pensions?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Bernd Fitzenberger & Reinhold Schnabel & Gaby Wunderlich, 2004. "The gender gap in labor market participation and employment: A cohort analysis for West Germany," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 83-116, February.
    13. Fabio B. LOSA & Pau ORIGONI, 2005. "The socio-cultural dimension of women's labour force participation choices in Switzerland," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 144(4), pages 473-494, December.
    14. Norman Bonney & Elizabeth Reinach, 1993. "Housework Reconsidered: The Oakley Thesis Twenty Years Later," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(4), pages 615-627, December.
    15. Peter Elias, 1996. "Book Reviews," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 10(3), pages 583-585, September.
    16. Steve Jefferys, 1996. "Down But Not Out: French Unions after Chirac," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 10(3), pages 509-527, September.
    17. Ann Hodgkinson & Chris Nyland & Simon Pomfret, 2001. "The Determination of Location in New South Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 39-55.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:1:p:45-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.