IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v7y1993i4p615-627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housework Reconsidered: The Oakley Thesis Twenty Years Later

Author

Listed:
  • Norman Bonney

    (Department of Sociology at Aberdeen University)

  • Elizabeth Reinach

    (Aberdeen University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Bonney & Elizabeth Reinach, 1993. "Housework Reconsidered: The Oakley Thesis Twenty Years Later," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(4), pages 615-627, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:4:p:615-627
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709374006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709374006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709374006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Hakim, 1993. "The Myth of Rising Female Employment," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(1), pages 97-120, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sue Speakman & Mick Marchington, 1999. "Ambivalent Patriarchs: Shiftworkers, `Breadwinners' and Housework," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(1), pages 83-105, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernd Fitzenberger & Gaby Wunderlich, 2004. "The Changing Life Cycle Pattern In Female Employment: A Comparison Of Germany And The Uk," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(3), pages 302-328, August.
    2. Steffen Hillmert, 2002. "Deregulation of the labor market and chances of employment in Great Britain," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Christina Jonung & Inga Persson, 1993. "Women and Market Work: The Misleading Tale of Participation Rates in International Comparisons," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(2), pages 259-274, June.
    4. Deidre Wicks & Gita Mishra & Lisa Milne, 2002. "Young Women, Work and Inequality: Is it What They Want or What They Get? An Australian Contribution to Research on Women and Workforce Participation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(3), pages 3-18, August.
    5. Jay Ginn & Sara Arber, 2002. "Degrees of Freedom: Do Graduate Women escape the Motherhood Gap in Pensions?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Bernd Fitzenberger & Reinhold Schnabel & Gaby Wunderlich, 2004. "The gender gap in labor market participation and employment: A cohort analysis for West Germany," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 83-116, February.
    7. Fabio B. LOSA & Pau ORIGONI, 2005. "The socio-cultural dimension of women's labour force participation choices in Switzerland," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 144(4), pages 473-494, December.
    8. Christine Cousins, 1994. "A Comparison of the Labour Market Position of Women in Spain and the UK with Reference to the `Flexible' Labour Debate," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(1), pages 45-67, March.
    9. Peter Elias, 1996. "Book Reviews," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 10(3), pages 583-585, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:4:p:615-627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.