IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v23y2009i3p422-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The consequences of caring: skills, regulation and reward among early years workers

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Findlay

    (Edinburgh University, p.findlay@ed.ac.uk)

  • Jeanette Findlay

    (Glasgow University, j.findlay@lbss.gla.ac.uk)

  • Robert Stewart

    (Independent Researcher, robert.stewart99@ntl.world.com)

Abstract

The persistence of gendered pay inequality raises questions as to what sustains it. Recent contributions highlight the role of low skills visibility and valuation in pay inequality in predominantly female occupations. This artical examines the skills and rewards of early years workers, the organizational processes through which their skills are measured and rewarded and the institutional and organizational influences on grading and pay systems.The article does so at an important juncture when the importance and regulation of the ‘early years’ sector has increased significantly and following pay equality initiatives. It concludes that while the application of more systematic forms of skill and job measurement has improved the relative rewards of nursery nurses, gendered constructions of their caring skills contaminate evaluation of their educational role such that undervaluation of their work persists. This finding raises implications for other work that incorporates caring skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Findlay & Jeanette Findlay & Robert Stewart, 2009. "The consequences of caring: skills, regulation and reward among early years workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 422-441, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:3:p:422-441
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017009337057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017009337057
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017009337057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maeve Quaid, 1993. "Job Evaluation As Institutional Myth," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 239-260, March.
    2. Susan Himmelweit, 2007. "The prospects for caring: economic theory and policy analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(4), pages 581-599, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hozer-Koćmiel Marta & Kuźmiński Wojciech, 2020. "Modelling Unpaid Housework Time in Poland on the Basis of a Time Use Survey," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 177-189, June.
    2. Julie A. Nelson, 2013. "Gender and caring," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 5, pages 62-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Valeria ESQUIVEL, 2010. "Care workers in Argentina: At the crossroads of labour market institutions and care services," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 149(4), pages 477-493, December.
    4. Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "Process Orientation And Information Management: The Case Of Achieving Success In The Pharmaceutical Industry," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(1), pages 23-36.
    5. Marina Della Giusta & Nigar Hashimzade, 2012. "Who Cares? Modelling the Care Drain," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2012-04, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    6. Jérôme Ballet & Emmanuel Petit & Delphine Pouchain, 2018. "What mainstream economics should learn from the ethics of care," Post-Print hal-02145302, HAL.
    7. Jackson, William A., 2014. "External Capabilities and the Limits to Social Policy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 125-142.
    8. Lans, Cheryl, 2016. "Worldwide Opportunities on Organic Farms (WWOOF) as part of the existing care economy in Canada," MPRA Paper 72713, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Pedro M. Romero-Fernandez & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2012. "Effects of Diversity on Group Decision-Making Processes: The Moderating Role of Human Resource Management," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 677-701, September.
    10. Sheila Dow, 2020. "Gender and the future of macroeconomics: an evolutionary approach," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 55-66, May.
    11. repec:rdg:wpaper:em-dp2012-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Andrea Doucet, 2021. "Socially Inclusive Parenting Leaves and Parental Benefit Entitlements: Rethinking Care and Work Binaries," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 227-237.
    13. Mann, Stefan, 2015. "An activity choice approach towards pricing of 1:1 personal services – on the omnipresence of interpersonal utility comparisons," MPRA Paper 62516, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Fagnani, Jeanne, 2012. "Recent reforms in childcare and family policies in France and Germany: What was at stake?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 509-516.
    15. Nancy Folbre, 2008. "Reforming Care," Politics & Society, , vol. 36(3), pages 373-387, September.
    16. Marina Della Giusta & Nigar Hashimzade & Sarah Jewell, 2011. "Why Care? Social Norms, Relative Income and the Supply of Unpaid Care," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2011-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    17. Rodríguez Enríquez, Corina, 2012. "Care: the missing link in economic analysis?," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    18. Julie Froud & Colin Haslam & Sukhdev Johal & Karel Williams, 2020. "(How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 316-336, June.
    19. McMaster, Robert & Batifoulier, Philippe & Domin, Jean-Paul, 2015. "Health is a matter of social definition," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 17.
    20. Sony, Michael & Antony, Jiju & Mc Dermott, Olivia & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, 2021. "An empirical examination of benefits, challenges, and critical success factors of industry 4.0 in manufacturing and service sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    21. L.J.B. Hayes & Sian Moore, 2017. "Care in a Time of Austerity: the Electronic Monitoring of Homecare Workers’ Time," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 329-344, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:3:p:422-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.