IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v35y2020i4p316-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Froud

    (University of Manchester, UK)

  • Colin Haslam
  • Sukhdev Johal

    (Queen Mary University of London, UK)

  • Karel Williams

Abstract

Academics and policy makers have increasingly recognised the importance of mundane economic activities – variously termed foundational or everyday. The foundational or everyday economy is now featuring in local industrial strategy and economic action plans, because the desirable high-tech sectors on the ‘frontier’ cannot diffuse prosperity within and between regions. This article aims to distinguish between several different approaches to the foundational or everyday economy and argues that a constructive approach needs to break with the preoccupation about improving productivity. This argument is developed in three stages. First, we distinguish between a social approach and a more technical economic approach to delimiting this other mundane economy; the defining feature of the foundational in the social approach is contribution to wellbeing and in the technical economic approach it is low productivity. The second section presents and explores productivity evidence on output per worker hour across a range of foundational activities and by region. Drawing out the implications of observed diversity and heterogeneity, the third section develops an argument about how productivity has limited relevance as measure and target in foundational activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Froud & Colin Haslam & Sukhdev Johal & Karel Williams, 2020. "(How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 316-336, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:316-336
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094220956952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094220956952
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094220956952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riley, Rebecca & Rosazza Bondibene, Chiara, 2017. "Raising the standard: Minimum wages and firm productivity," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 27-50.
    2. Stephen Broadberry & Mary O’Mahony, 2004. "Britain’s Productivity Gap with the United States and Europe: A Historical Perspective," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 189(1), pages 72-85, July.
    3. Susan Himmelweit, 2007. "The prospects for caring: economic theory and policy analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(4), pages 581-599, July.
    4. William Baumol, 1996. "Children of performing arts, the economic dilemma: The climbing costs of health care and education," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(3), pages 183-206, September.
    5. Philip McCann, 2020. "Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: insights from the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 256-267, February.
    6. Mason, Geoff & O'Mahony, Mary & Riley, Rebecca, 2018. "What is Holding Back UK Productivity? Lessons from Decades of Measurement," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 246, pages 24-35, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Butzin & Franz Flögel, 2024. "High-tech development for “left behind” places: lessons-learnt from the Ruhr cybersecurity ecosystem," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 307-322.
    2. Laura Reynolds & Dylan Henderson & Chen Xu & Laura Norris, 2021. "Digitalisation and the foundational economy: A digital opportunity or a digital divide for less-developed regions?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(6), pages 451-467, September.
    3. Tomáš Mandičák & Marcela Spišáková & Peter Mésároš, 2024. "Sustainable Design and Building Information Modeling of Construction Project Management towards a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Mikhail Martynovich & Teis Hansen & Karl-Johan Lundquist, 2023. "Can foundational economy save regions in crisis?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 577-599.
    5. Birgitte Nygaard & Teis Hansen, 2020. "Local development through the foundational economy? Priority-setting in Danish municipalities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(8), pages 768-786, December.
    6. Mikhail Martynovich & Teis Hansen & Karl-Johan Lundquist, 2023. "Can foundational economy save regions in crisis?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 577-599.
    7. Richard Bärnthaler & Andreas Novy & Leonhard Plank, 2021. "The Foundational Economy as a Cornerstone for a Social–Ecological Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Butzin, Anna & Flögel, Franz, 2022. "High-tech left behind? Lessons from the Ruhr cybersecurity ecosystem for approaches to develop "left behind" places," IAT Discussion Papers 22/04, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Henning & Hans Westlund & Kerstin Enflo, 2023. "Urban–rural population changes and spatial inequalities in Sweden," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 878-892, May.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Neil Lee & Cornelius Lipp, 2021. "Golfing with Trump. Social capital, decline, inequality, and the rise of populism in the US," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 457-481.
    3. Julie A. Nelson, 2013. "Gender and caring," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 5, pages 62-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Andr s Rodr guez-Pose & Javier Terrero-Davila & Neil Lee, 2023. "Left-Behind vs. Unequal Places: Interpersonal Inequality, Economic Decline, and the Rise of Populism in the US and Europe," LIS Working papers 859, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    5. Paetzold, Jörg, 2012. "The Convergence of Welfare State Indicators in Europe: Evidence from Panel Data," Working Papers in Economics 2012-4, University of Salzburg.
    6. Andrea Garnero, 2018. "The dog that barks doesn’t bite: coverage and compliance of sectoral minimum wages in Italy," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Annie Tubadji & Thomas Colwill & Don Webber, 2021. "Voting with your feet or voting for Brexit: The tale of those stuck behind," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 247-277, April.
    8. Fetzer, Thiemo & Edenhofer, Jacob & Garg, Prashant, 2024. "Local Decline and Populism," CEPR Discussion Papers 19330, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Revisiting the Balassa–Samuelson effect: International tourism and cultural proximity," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(8), pages 915-944, December.
    10. Daria Denti, 2022. "Looking ahead in anger: The effects of foreign migration on youth resentment in England," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 578-603, March.
    11. Hans Westlund & Kamila Borsekova, 2023. "Rural problems, policies and possibilities in a post‐urban world," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 717-728, May.
    12. Koch, Andreas & Kirchmann, Andrea & Reiner, Marcel & Scheu, Tobias & Boockmann, Bernhard & Bonin, Holger, 2018. "Verhaltensmuster von Betrieben und Beschäftigten im Zuge der Einführung des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns," IZA Research Reports 84, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Bossler, Mario & Gürtzgen, Nicole & Lochner, Benjamin & Betzl, Ute & Feist, Lisa, 2018. "The German minimum wage: Effects on business expectations, profitability, and investments," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 13/2018, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    14. Davide Castellani & Mariacristina Piva & Torben Schubert & Marco Vivarelli, 2018. "The source of the US /EU Productivity Gap:Less and less effective R&D," LEM Papers Series 2018/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    15. Bart van Ark, 2021. "Putting Together the Pieces of the Productivity Puzzle: Review Article of Productivity Perspectives and Productivity and the Pandemic," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 40, pages 118-133, Spring.
    16. Dami'an Vergara, 2022. "Minimum Wages and Optimal Redistribution," Papers 2202.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    17. Valeria ESQUIVEL, 2010. "Care workers in Argentina: At the crossroads of labour market institutions and care services," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 149(4), pages 477-493, December.
    18. Maria Greve & Michael Fritsch & Michael Wyrwich, 2023. "Long‐term decline of regions and the rise of populism: The case of Germany," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 409-445, March.
    19. Tamás Kaiser, 2023. "Understanding Narratives in Governance: Naming and Framing Regional Inequality in the United Kingdom," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Marina Della Giusta & Nigar Hashimzade, 2012. "Who Cares? Modelling the Care Drain," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2012-04, Department of Economics, University of Reading.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:316-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.