IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v20y2006i4p687-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the disciplinary process in nursing: a case study approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Cooke

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

This article examines the disciplinary process in nursing using data drawn from qualitative cases studies carried out in three healthcare Trusts in the north of England.The main method of data collection employed in the cases studies was in depth interviews with managers, nurses and trade union representatives.The study considers the models of discipline employed by managers when making the decision to discipline, the conduct of disciplinary cases and their outcomes.The study pays particular attention to ‘quasi-formal’ discipline in which investigative processes may be used as punishments.The study also considers the poor outcomes of disciplinary action and their relationship to the ways in which disciplinary processes are conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Cooke, 2006. "Examining the disciplinary process in nursing: a case study approach," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(4), pages 687-707, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:20:y:2006:i:4:p:687-707
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017006069809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017006069809
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017006069809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K.G. Knight & Paul Latreille, 2000. "Discipline, Dismissals and Complaints to Employment Tribunals," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 533-555, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anand Chand, 2018. "Expanding Gouldner’s Theory of Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy: Looking Back and Moving Forward," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 317-334, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laszlo Goerke & Markus Pannenberg, 2012. "Risk Aversion and Trade‐Union Membership," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 114(2), pages 275-295, June.
    2. Linda Dickens, 2014. "The Coalition government's reforms to employment tribunals and statutory employment rights—echoes of the past," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 234-249, May.
    3. Bernard Walker & R.T. Hamilton, 2015. "What influences the progression of employment rights disputes?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 117-133, March.
    4. Goerke, Laszlo & Pannenberg, Markus, 2015. "Trade union membership and sickness absence: Evidence from a sick pay reform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 13-25.
    5. Stephen Wood & Richard Saundry & Paul Latreille, 2017. "The management of discipline and grievances in British workplaces: the evidence from 2011 WERS," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 2-21, January.
    6. Blanchflower, David G. & Bryson, Alex & Forth, John, 2006. "Workplace Industrial Relations in Britain, 1980-2004," IZA Discussion Papers 2518, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. George Saridakis & Sukanya Sen‐Gupta & Paul Edwards & David J. Storey, 2008. "The Impact of Enterprise Size on Employment Tribunal Incidence and Outcomes: Evidence from Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 469-499, September.
    8. Jeremy Tanguy, 2013. "Collective and Individual Conflicts in the Workplace: Evidence from F rance," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 102-133, January.
    9. Goerke, Laszlo & Pannenberg, Markus, 2011. "Trade union membership and dismissals," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 810-821.
    10. Andy Charlwood & Anna Pollert, 2014. "Informal Employment Dispute Resolution among Low-Wage Non-Union Workers: Does Managerially Initiated Workplace Voice Enhance Equity and Efficiency?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 359-386, June.
    11. Valerie Antcliff & Richard Saundry, 2009. "Accompaniment, Workplace Representation and Disciplinary Outcomes in British Workplaces — Just a Formality?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 100-121, March.
    12. Nils Braakmann & Boris Hirsch, 2024. "Unions as insurance: Workplace unionization and workers' outcomes during COVID‐19," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 152-171, April.
    13. Braakmann, Nils & Hirsch, Boris, 2023. "Unions as Insurance: Employer–Worker Risk Sharing and Workers' Outcomes during COVID-19," IZA Discussion Papers 15893, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Paul Latreille, 2017. "The economics of employment tribunals," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 331-331, January.
    15. John Forth, 2008. "Conflict at Work: The Pattern of Disputes in Britain since 1980," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 316, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    16. Morin, Annaïg, 2017. "Cyclicality of wages and union power," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-22.
    17. Benoit Pierre Freyens & Paul Oslington, 2021. "The impact of unfair dismissal regulation: Evidence from an Australian natural experiment," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 35(2), pages 264-290, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:20:y:2006:i:4:p:687-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.