IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v17y2011i2p145-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Degryse

    (ETUI, cdegryse@etui.org)

  • Philippe Pochet

    (Director, ETUI, ppochet@etui.org)

Abstract

This article looks at the way in which European sectoral social dialogue has developed over the past 20 years. It tries to determine whether the establishment of Sectoral Social Dialogue Committees in 1998 (SSDCs; currently 40) has affected the nature and/or quantity of texts adopted by these bodies. To this end, two periods are considered: 1990—1997 and 1998—2009. A first finding is that European sectoral social dialogue has burgeoned since the mid-1990s. The establishment of SSDCs therefore forms part of this expansion. Our main finding is that, whereas previously sectoral social dialogue was primarily geared towards ‘joint lobbying’ documents addressed to the European institutions, it now appears to be generating more documents that reflect ‘reciprocal commitments’. Yet this trend is really only perceptible from 2003 onwards, five years after the first SSDCs were established. The increased number of binding joint texts adopted can be explained by the Commission having undertaken more consultation (under Treaty Article 154) which opened a window of opportunity for the social partners to sign ‘agreements’.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:145-158
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258911401366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258911401366
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258911401366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Pochet, 2005. "Sectoral social dialogue? A quantitative analysis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-332, August.
    2. Anne Dufresne & C. Degryse & P. Pochet, 2006. "The European Sectoral Social Dialogue: Actors, developments and challenges," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/47217, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Bandasz, 2014. "A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 505-520, November.
    2. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    2. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    3. Mehtap Akgüç & Marta Kahancová & Jaan Masso, 2024. "One-way street to the European Union? Between national and EU-level social dialogue 20 years after eastward EU enlargement," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 33-49, February.
    4. Krzysztof Bandasz, 2014. "A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 505-520, November.
    5. Evelyne Leonard & André Sobczak, 2010. "Accords transnationaux d'entreprises et dialogue social sectoriel européen : quelles interactions ?," Post-Print hal-00771166, HAL.
    6. Akg��, Mehtap & Marti�kov�, Monika & Sz�di, G�bor & Nordlund, Carl, 2019. "Stakeholders� views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness," CEPS Papers 25211, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    7. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    8. Marie-Ange Moreau, 2011. "Introduction," Chapters, in: Marie-Ange Moreau (ed.), Before and After the Economic Crisis, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Jane Lethbridge, 2011. "Social dialogue in the hospital sector at EU level," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 501-513, November.
    10. Barbara Bechter & Sabrina Weber & Manuela Galetto & Bengt Larsson & Thomas Prosser, 2021. "Opening the black box: Actors and interactions shaping European sectoral social dialogue," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 269-288, September.
    11. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    12. Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 365-382, July.
    13. Bengt Larsson & Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2020. "What's the point of European Sectoral Social Dialogue? Effectiveness and polycontexturality in the hospital and metal sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 410-426, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:145-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.