IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v30y2024i1p33-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One-way street to the European Union? Between national and EU-level social dialogue 20 years after eastward EU enlargement

Author

Listed:
  • Mehtap Akgüç

    (European Trade Union Institute, Belgium
    Institute of Labor Economics, Germany)

  • Marta Kahancová

    (Central European Labour Studies Institute, Slovakia
    Comenius University, Slovakia)

  • Jaan Masso

    (University of Tartu, Estonia)

Abstract

This article assesses perceptions among national and EU-level social partners of developments in social dialogue since the EU accession of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries 20 years ago. The analysis evaluates the processes, structures and outcomes of interactions between social partners from CEE countries and the EU level. Social partners from CEE countries see the benefits of interaction with and exposure to EU-level social dialogue. On the other hand, their underdeveloped national structures for tripartite dialogue and sectoral bargaining pose a substantial barrier to capacity building and to voicing their interests at the EU level, undermining their legitimacy in EU-level structures. Even 20 years after enlargement, there is a perceived duality and internal competition between ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ social partners at the EU level, criticisms of the ability of EU-level social dialogue structures to deliver effective outcomes, and a diversity of actors’ preferences concerning binding and non-binding provisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehtap Akgüç & Marta Kahancová & Jaan Masso, 2024. "One-way street to the European Union? Between national and EU-level social dialogue 20 years after eastward EU enlargement," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 33-49, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:30:y:2024:i:1:p:33-49
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589241229070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589241229070
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589241229070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    2. Smismans, Stijn, 2008. "The European Social Dialogue in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 161-180, April.
    3. Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková & Carl Nordlund, 2019. "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Social Dialogue Articulation in Europe: Conceptual and Analytical Framework in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective," Discussion Papers 55, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    4. Christian Lévesque & Gregor Murray, 2010. "Understanding union power: resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(3), pages 333-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    2. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    3. Hrvoje Butković & Jan Czarzasty & Adam Mrozowicki, 2023. "Gains and pitfalls of coalitions: Societal resources as sources of trade union power in Croatia and Poland," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(1), pages 43-61, March.
    4. Louisa Acciari, 2024. "Caring is resisting: Lessons from domestic workers' mobilizations during COVID‐19 in Latin America," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 319-336, January.
    5. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    6. Jeremy Waddington, 2014. "Workplace representation, its impact on trade union members and its capacity to compete with management in the European workplace," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 537-558, November.
    7. Jørgen Svalund & Heidi Kervinen, 2013. "Trade union power during labour adjustments – comparison of company-level cases," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(4), pages 489-505, November.
    8. Torsten Geelan, 2013. "Responses of trade union confederations to the youth employment crisis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(3), pages 399-413, August.
    9. Heather Connolly, 2020. "‘We just get a bit set in our ways’: renewing democracy and solidarity in UK trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 207-222, May.
    10. Akgüç, Mehtap & Baiocco, Sara, 2019. "Comparative policy recommendations on improving social dialogue articulation and effectiveness in Europe," CEPS Papers 25974, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Gregor Gall & Jack Fiorito, 2012. "Union Commitment and Activism in Britain and the United States: Searching for Synthesis and Synergy for Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 189-213, June.
    12. Tom Hunt & Heather Connolly, 2023. "Covid‐19 and the work of trade unions: Adaptation, transition and renewal," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 150-166, March.
    13. Pülzl, Helga & Lazdinis, Marius, 2011. "May the Open Method of Coordination be a new instrument for forest policy deliberations in the European Union?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 411-418, July.
    14. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    15. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    16. Stevis, Dimitris., 2010. "International framework agreements and global social dialogue : parameters and prospects," ILO Working Papers 994539893402676, International Labour Organization.
    17. Marginson, Paul & Keune, Maarten, 2012. "European social dialogue as multi-level governance: Towards more autonomy and new dependencies," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.
    18. Nathaniel Tetteh & Stephen Mustchin, 2023. "Contrasting union orientations and engagement with international private regulation: The agency and role of labour in MNC subsidiaries in Ghana," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 506-525, September.
    19. Genevieve Coderre-LaPalme & Ian Greer & Lisa Schulte, 2023. "Welfare, Work and the Conditions of Social Solidarity: British Campaigns to Defend Healthcare and Social Security," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 352-372, April.
    20. Arianna Marcolin & Stefano Gasparri, 2024. "Digitalization and employment relations in the retail sector. Examining the role of trade unions in Italy and Spain," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 30(2), pages 151-178, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:30:y:2024:i:1:p:33-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.