IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v51y2022i3p1282-1324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry

Author

Listed:
  • Chantal Fahmy
  • Kendra J. Clark
  • Meghan M. Mitchell
  • Scott H. Decker
  • David C. Pyrooz

Abstract

After nearly four decades of growth, the number of people held in U.S. prisons has begun to decline. In an era of decarceration, social scientists need to understand prisoner reentry experiences. Longitudinal studies are one strategy to accomplish this goal. Yet, the retention of a formerly incarcerated population across waves of interviews is challenging due to their transient lifestyles and limited support systems, which may be further complicated by gang involvement. This article details the longitudinal follow-up procedures used in the LoneStar Project—a multiwave study of 802 males first interviewed in prison and reinterviewed twice in the year postrelease—to build rapport, complete interviews, and minimize attrition. We then evaluate the effectiveness of our procedures on important outcomes including interview yields, appointments, and incoming calls. Results indicate that any outgoing contact with respondents via appointment reminders and other reciprocal modes of contact lead to greater project engagement and a greater likelihood of interview completion. We conclude with relevant takeaways for researchers seeking to maximize survey participation with hard-to-reach populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantal Fahmy & Kendra J. Clark & Meghan M. Mitchell & Scott H. Decker & David C. Pyrooz, 2022. "Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(3), pages 1282-1324, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:1282-1324
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124119875962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124119875962
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124119875962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:1282-1324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.