IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i24p7185-d1300831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Ethnic Minority Representation in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Demographics

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Henley

    (Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK)

  • Tanimola Martins

    (Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK)

  • Reza Zamani

    (Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK)

Abstract

The under-representation of non-White participants in Western countries in clinical research has received increased attention, due to recognized physiological differences between ethnic groups, which may affect the efficacy and optimal dosage of some treatments. This review assessed ethnic diversity in pharmaceutical trials for fibromyalgia, a poorly understood chronic pain disorder. We also investigated longitudinal change to non-White participant proportions in trials and non-White participants’ likelihood to discontinue with fibromyalgia research between trial stages (retention). First, we identified relevant trials conducted in the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2022, by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. In trials conducted both across the United States and Canada, and exclusively within the United States, approximately 90% of participants were White. A longitudinal analysis also found no change in the proportion of non-White participants in trials conducted across the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2022. Finally, we found no significant differences in trial retention between White and non-White participants. This review highlights the low numbers of ethnic minorities in fibromyalgia trials conducted in the United States and Canada, with no change to these proportions over the past 22 years. Furthermore, non-White participants were not more likely to discontinue with the fibromyalgia research once they were recruited.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Henley & Tanimola Martins & Reza Zamani, 2023. "Assessing Ethnic Minority Representation in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Demographics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7185-:d:1300831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George, S. & Duran, N. & Norris, K., 2014. "A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(2), pages 16-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Margrethe Kynoe & Drude Fugelseth & Ingrid Hanssen, 2020. "When a common language is missing: Nurse–mother communication in the NICU. A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2221-2230, July.
    2. Crooks, Natasha & Yates, Latrice & Sosina, Wuraola & Johnson, Juquita & Strong, Alexis & Griggs, Brianna & Shipp, Kentrele & Green, Betty & Matthews, Alicia & Johnson, Waldo, 2024. "Strategies for engaging Black male caregivers in family-based research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Amelia S Knopf & Peter Krombach & Amy J Katz & Rebecca Baker & Gregory Zimet, 2021. "Measuring research mistrust in adolescents and adults: Validity and reliability of an adapted version of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Rohini Chakravarthy & Sarah C Stallings & Michael Williams & Megan Hollister & Mario Davidson & Juan Canedo & Consuelo H Wilkins, 2020. "Factors influencing precision medicine knowledge and attitudes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Bruce, Marta M. & Ulrich, Connie M. & Webster, Jessica & Richmond, Therese S., 2022. "Injured black men's perceptions of the recovery environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Charlene S. Aaron, 2016. "Recruitment of African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes Who Care For Persons With Dementia," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 3-8, February.
    7. William T. Hu & Stephanie M. Bergren & Dana K. Dychtwald & Yiming Ma & XinQi Dong, 2023. "Variations in racial and ethnic groups’ trust in researchers associated with willingness to participate in research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Stephen Amoah & Ruth Ennin & Karen Sagoe & Astrid Steinbrecher & Tobias Pischon & Frank P. Mockenhaupt & Ina Danquah, 2021. "Feasibility of a Culturally Adapted Dietary Weight-Loss Intervention among Ghanaian Migrants in Berlin, Germany: The ADAPT Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Margarita Echeverri & David Anderson & Anna María Nápoles & Jacqueline M. Haas & Marc E. Johnson & Friar Sergio A. Serrano, 2018. "Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2022. "NIH Grant Expansion, Ancestral Diversity and Scientific Discovery in Genomics Research," NBER Working Papers 30155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Florence Samkange-Zeeb & Ronja Foraita & Stefan Rach & Tilman Brand, 2019. "Feasibility of using respondent-driven sampling to recruit participants in superdiverse neighbourhoods for a general health survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 451-459, April.
    12. Kristina W. Whitworth & Inkyu Han & Masoud Afshar & Yuan Mei & Pamela D. Berens & Shreela V. Sharma & Elaine Symanski, 2017. "Accessing Disadvantaged Pregnant Women in Houston, Texas, and Characterizing Biomarkers of Metal Exposure: A Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Dalnim Cho & Beverly Gor & Hyunsoo Hwang & Xuemei Wang & Mike Hernandez & Lovell A. Jones & Jacqueline Frost & Pamela Roberson & Curtis A. Pettaway, 2024. "A Community-Based Prostate Cancer Screening and Education Program for Asian American Men in Medically Underserved Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, March.
    14. K. Viswanath & Rachel Faulkenberry McCloud & Edmund W. J. Lee & Mesfin A. Bekalu, 2022. "Measuring What Matters: Data Absenteeism, Science Communication, and the Perpetuation of Inequities," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 208-219, March.
    15. Rachel E. Davis & Frederick G. Conrad & Shaohua Dong & Anna Mesa & Sunghee Lee & Timothy P. Johnson, 2024. "An ounce of prevention: using conversational interviewing and avoiding agreement response scales to prevent acquiescence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 471-495, February.
    16. Zamil Khadija & Alsharqi Omar, 2019. "The Effect of Information Technology on the Recruitment Process in Healthcare Organization in Makkah City," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 123-123, February.
    17. Ewelina M. Swierad & Terry T.-K. Huang, 2021. "It Starts with a Conversation: The Importance of Values as Building Blocks of Engagement Strategies in Community-Centered Public Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Zandra Engelbak Nielsen & Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen, 2019. "Cancer patients’ perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2443-2461, July.
    19. Julia A Dalton & Dianne Rodger & Michael Wilmore & Sal Humphreys & Andrew Skuse & Claire T Roberts & Vicki L Clifton, 2018. "The Health-e Babies App for antenatal education: Feasibility for socially disadvantaged women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Rogério M. Pinto & Anya Y. Spector & Rahbel Rahman, 2019. "Nurturing Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships to Improve Adoption and Delivery of Research-Based Social and Public Health Services Worldwide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7185-:d:1300831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.